ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE MAHASISWA CALON GURU KIMIA MA/SMA

Evi Sapinatul Bahriah

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to determine the ability of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) pre-service education of chemistry in MA/SMA. The method used is descriptive qualitative. The subjects consist of 30 students from the Department of Chemistry Education 8th semester of the academic year 2015/2016 FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta in March to September 2016. The ability of PCK measured consists of seven components: knowledge of science, knowledge of goals, knowledge of students, knowledge of curriculum organization, knowledge of teaching, knowledge of assessment, and knowledge of resources. The instrument used in this study consisted of objective tests and oral tests. Data were analyzed with descriptive qualitative. The results of this study show that: 1) The percentage of the average value of the ability of PCK overall is 56.67% is included enough category. 2) The percentage of the average value of the ability of PCK highest is indicators Knowledge of science, KoSc amounted to 65.67% (good categories), while the percentage of the average value of the ability of PCK lowest is an indicator knowledge of students 26.67% (less than one category). 3) The ability of PCK pre-service education of chemistry is enough category.

 


Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) calon guru kimia MA/SMA. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 30 orang mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia semester 8 tahun akademik 2015/2016 FITK UIN Syarif hidayatullah Jakarta pada bulan Maret-September 2016. Kemampuan PCK yang diukur terdiri dari 7 komponen yaitu knowledge of science, knowledge of goals, knowledge of students, knowledge of curriculum organization, knowledge of teaching, knowledge of assessment, and knowledge of resources. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari tes objektif dan tes lisan. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Persentase nilai rata-rata kemampuan PCK calon guru kimia secara keseluruhan adalah sebesar 56,67% yang termasuk dalam kategori cukup. 2) Persentase nilai rata-rata kemampuan PCK calon guru kimia tertinggi adalah indikator pengetahuan terhadap konten sains (Knowledge of science, KoSc) sebesar 65,67% (kategori baik), sedangkan persentase nilai rata-rata kemampuan PCK calon guru kimia terendah adalah indikator pengetahuan terhadap karakteristik siswa (Knowledge of students, KoSt) sebesar 26,67% (kategori kurang sekali). 3) Kemampuan PCK calon guru kimia secara umum termasuk kategori cukup.


Keywords


Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK); Calon guru kimia MA/SMA; Deskriptif Kualitatif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2006, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Revisi, Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.

Arifin, M. 2000, Strategi Belajar Mengajar Kimia, Bandung, FMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Arikunto, S. 2005, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Cet. Ke-12, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.

Ardiansyah, A. I. & Bahriah, E. S., 2016, Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Instrumen Three-Tier Multiple Choice Berbantuan Microsoft Office Excel, EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan),vol.1, no. 2, hh. 204-214.

Barke, D. H., Hazri, A., & Ytibarek, S, 2009, Misconceptions in Chemistry Addressing Preconception in Chemical Education, German, Spriger.

BNSP, 2006, Panduan Penyusunan KTSP Jenjang Dikdasmen, Depdiknas.

Demirkasimoglu, N. 2010, Defining teacher professionalism from different perspectives, Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 9, hh. 2047-2051.

Depdiknas, 2005-a, Undang-Undang RI Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, Jakarta, Fokus-media.

K. Abella, S, 2008, Twenty Years Later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 30, No. 10, hh. 1405–1416.

Loughran J., Amanda Berry & Pamela Mulhall, 2006, Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Rotterdam, Sense Publishers.

Munandar, Muslimin Ibrahim, & Leny, Y., 2015, Model Learning Cycle untuk Transformasi Pedagogik pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi: Suatu Model Hipotetik untuk Meningkatkan Profesional Calon Guru, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi 2015, Malang, 21 Maret 2015.

Menteri PANRB, 2009, Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Rerofmasi Birokrasi No. 16 Tahun 2009 Tentang Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya.

NSTA & AETS, 2003, Standards for Science Teacher Preparation Speck, M & C. Puslitjak, 2013, Draft Kajian Pencapaian Peningkatan Profesionalisme dan Distribusi Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Jenjang Dikmen, Tidak Diterbitkan, Jakarta, Puslitjak Kemendikbud.

Rollnicka, Marissa; Judith Bennettb; Mariam Rhemtulaa; Nadine

Dharseyc; Thandi Ndlovua, 2008, The Place of Subject Matter Knowledge in Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 30, No. 10, hh. 1365–1387.

Shulman, L. S., 1986, Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, vol. 15, no. 2, hh.4–14.

Saga, H., 2012, Dampak Kesejahteraan Guru Terhadap Mutu Input LPTK, Depdikbud.

Sukardi 2007, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Yogyakarta, Bumi Aksara.

Sukmadinata, S. N. 1997, Pengembangan Kurikulum, Bandung, Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sudjana 2006, Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Bandung, Falah Production.

Tumisem, Arif Husein, 2013, Analisis Dominasi Kompetensi Profesional Guru IPA yang Tersertifikasi di SMP Kabupaten Banyumas Bagian Barat Melalui Pendidikan Karakter, Sainteks Vol. X, No 2 Oktober 2013.

UNDP 2010, Human Development Report: 40-year Trends Analysis Shows Poor Countries Making Faster Development Gains, Diakses melalui: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2010

Presiden RI, 2005, UU RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen.

World Economic Forum Geneva Switzerland, 2000, The Global Competitiveness Report 2000, New York, Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v2i1.1298

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Evi Sapinatul Bahriah

EduChemia Indexed by:

Hasil gambar untuk logo google scholar     Hasil gambar untuk logo DOAJ

 

 

Hasil gambar untuk logo IPI garuda

 

Hasil gambar untuk logo sinta dikti