Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia

Andri Wahyu Wijayadi

Abstract


Solubility and solubility product topic consists of abstract concepts and mathematic calculation. Mastering of concepts in this topic requires Scientific Reasoning Skills (SRS). Teaching of solubility and solubility product topic expected to developing students’ SRS. Therefore, students’ learning outcomes tends to be high. The purposes of this research are to find out the difference of learning outcomes of students learned using guided inquiry and verification strategies regarding students’ SRS. This research applied a 2 x 2 factorialized design. Data were score of SRS and learning outcomes  analyzed using Two Ways ANOVA statistics. The results showed that learned using guided inquiry strategy and higher level of SRS gave higher learning outcomes.

 


Keywords


Inkuiri terbimbing; verifikasi; kemampuan berpikir ilmiah; hasil belajar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Wu, N. 2009. Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Science, 323: 1-9.

Bent, H. A. & Bent, H. E. 1980. “What Do I Remember? The Role of Lecture-experiment in Teaching Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 57 (9): 609-617.

Bird, L. 2010. Logical Reasoning Ability and Student Performance in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 87 (5): 541-546.

Blanchard, M.R., Shouterland, S.A., Osborne, J.W., Sampson, V.D. Anneta, L.A., & Granger, E.M. 2010. Is Inquiry Possible in Light of Accountability?: A Quantitative Comparison of The Relative Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction. Science education, 578-616.

Cavallo, A.M.L., Rozman, M., Blickenstaff, J., & Walker, N. 2003. Learning, Reasoning, Motivation, and Epistemological Beliefs Differing Approaches in College Science Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 18-23.

Coletta, V.P. & Phillips, J.A. 2005. Interpreting FCI Scores: Normalized Gain, Preinstruction Scores, and Scientific Reasoning Ability. American Journal of Physics, 73 (12): 1172-1182.

Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C., & Ehlert, B. 2008. Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85 (6): 873–878.

Effendy. 1985. Pengaruh Pengajaran Ilmu Kimia dengan Cara Inkuiri Terbimbing dan dengan Cara Verifikasi terhadap Perkembangan Intelek dan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa IKIP Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia Tahun Pertama. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Jakarta: Fakultas Pascasarjana IKIP Jakarta.

Hubbi, M., Dasna, I.W., & Wonorahardjo, S. 2017. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Praktikum Sifat Koligatif terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XII. Jurnal EduChemia, 2 (1): (52-62).

Lawson, A.E. 2000. Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning, (Online), (http://lsweb.la.asu.edu/alawson/LawsonAssesments.htm, diakses 21 Juni 2013).

Naseriazar, Ozmen, & Badrian. 2011. Effectiveness of Analogies on Students Understanding of Chemical Equlibrium. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences. 491-495.

Nnorom, N.R. 2013. The Effect of Reasoning Skills on Students Achievement in Biology in Anambra State. International Journal of Scientific & Enginering Research, 4 (12): 2102-2104.

Pavelich, M.J. & Abraham, M.R. 1977. Guided Inquiry Laboratories for General Chemistry Students. Journal of College Science Teaching. 7 (1): 23-24.

Sund, R.B. & Trowbridge, L.W. 1973. Teaching Science by Inquiry in the Secondary School 2nd Ed. Ohio: A Beell & Howell Company.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v2i2.1473

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Andri Wahyu Wijayadi

EduChemia Indexed by:

Hasil gambar untuk logo google scholar     Hasil gambar untuk logo DOAJ

 

 

Hasil gambar untuk logo IPI garuda

 

Hasil gambar untuk logo sinta dikti