Keefektifan Tes Pilihan Ganda Tiga Tingkat dan Pilihan Ganda-Wawancara dalam Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi

Maya Erliza Anggraeni, Effendy Effendy, Munzil Munzil

Abstract


Asam-Basa adalah salah satu materi penting yang dipelajari di SMA yang mencakup pemahaman konsep dasar dan melibatkan representasi makroskopik, mikroskopik dan simbolik. Hal ini menyebabkan materi asam-basa cenderung sulit dipahami oleh siswa. Kesulitan mempelajari materi Asam-Basa berpotensi menimbulkan miskonsepsi. Oleh karena itu perlu dilakukannya identifikasi miskonsepsi. Penelitian ini merupakan rancangan deskriptif untuk membandingkan keefektifan tes pilihan ganda tiga tingkat terhadap tes pilihan ganda diikuti wawancara dalam mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi asam-basa. Subjek penelitian ini adalah dua kelas homogen dari kelas program IPA pola lima semester SMAN 8 Malang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tes pilihan ganda diikuti wawancara lebih efektif dibandingkan tes pilihan ganda tiga tingkat. Terdapat sembilan miskonsepsi yang dialami siswa, empat diantaranya merupakan miskonsepsi yang belum ditemukan pada penelitian lain.


Keywords


tes pilihan ganda; tes pilihan ganda tiga tingkat; wawancara

Full Text:

PDF

References


Artdej, R., Thasaneeya, R., Coll, R K. & Tienthong, T. 2010. Thai Grade 11 Students’ Alternative Conceptions for Acid–Base Chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 28, no. 2, hh. 167–183.

Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. 2009. Misconceptions in Chemistry, Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education, Berlin, Springer.

Bretz, S. L. & McClary, L. 2015. Students' Understandings of Acid Strength: How Meaningful Is Reliability When Measuring Alternative Conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, no. 2, hh. 212-219.

Cetin-Dindar, A. & Geban, Ö. 2011. Development Of A Three-Tier Test To Assess High School Students' Understanding Of Acids And Bases. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, hh. 15:600-604.

Çetingül, P. İ. & Geban, Ö. 2011. Understanding Of Acid-Base Concept By Using Conceptual Change Approach. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) no. 29, hh. 69-74.

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. 2007. The Development Of A Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument For Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability To Describe And Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels Of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, hh. 293-307.

Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Barufaldi, J. P. 2010. The Positive And Negative Effects Of Science Concept Tests On Student Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Science Education, vol. 32, no. 2, hh. 265-282.

Graulich, N. 2015. The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: how do students deal with the invisible? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 16, hh. 9—21.

Gurel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., McDermott, L. C. 2015. A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 5, hh. 989-1008.

Halstead, S.E., 2009. A Critical Analysis of Research Done to Identify Conceptual Difficulties in Acid-Base Chemistry., Dissertation, School of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.

Kaltakçı, D. 2012. Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Nursa’adah. E., Kurniawati, D., Yunita. 2016. Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Asam-Basa Menggunakan Tes Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), vol. 1, no. 1, hh. 25-35.

Orgill, M., and A. Sutherland. 2008. Undergraduate chemistry students’ perceptions of and misonceptions about buffers and buffer problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 29, hh. 131–43.

Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. 2010. Development Of A Three-Tier Test To Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 103, no. 3, hh. 208-222.

Treagust, D.F. & Hudson, R.D. 2013. Which form of assessment provides the best information about student performance in chemistry examinations? Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 31, no. 1, hh. 49–65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i1.1845

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Maya Erliza Anggraeni, Effendy Effendy, Munzil Munzil

EduChemia Indexed by:

    

             

                                                                                                                                                                                      More Indecxing... 

 

Creative Commons License

EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

________________________________________________________

EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan) ISSN 2502-4778 (print) | ISSN 2502-4787 (online)
Published by Department of Chemistry Education - Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Address : Jl. Ciwaru Raya No. 25, Sempu, Kota Serang, Banten 42117, Indonesia
Email  : educhemia@untirta.ac.id