DAMPAK SUBSIDI RASKIN TERHADAP ASUPAN GIZI RUMAHTANGGA MISKIN DI INDONESIA

Lili Theresanti Muslimah; Prani Sastiono

doi:10.35448/jequ.v2i2.7168

DAMPAK SUBSIDI RASKIN TERHADAP ASUPAN GIZI RUMAHTANGGA MISKIN DI INDONESIA

Lili Theresanti Muslimah, Prani Sastiono

Abstract

In this study we estimate the impact of the Raskin subsidy policy on poor households' nutritional intake in Indonesia. The effect of Raskin subsidies on household rice consumption, calories from eight household consumption commodities and total household calories using
demand function theory. Households are grouped according to the amount of rice consumption before the Raskin subsidy policy was implemented. The hypothesis of Raskin subsidy impact on calorie consumption is positive. Using panel data approach and two-stage regression (2SLS) is estimated coefficient, whether there is substitution effect or income effect. Suspected of endogenous relationship between rice consumption and subsidy then used the interaction ownership of social protection card and Post as an instrument variable. The results of the study showed that the impact of subsidies on calories is increasing in household groups with low rice consumption level, while the high level of calories consumption is reduced.

Keywords

Instrument variable, Perilaku Rumahtangga, Kebijakan Subsidi Raskin

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BPS. (2016a). Konsumsi Kalori dan Protein Penduduk Indonesia dan Provinsi 2016 Buku 2.

BPS. (2016b). Perhitungan dan Analisis Kemiskinan Makro Indonesia 2016. Indonesia.

Devaney, B., & Moffitt, R. (1991). Dietary Effects of the Food Stamp Program. American Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 73(1), 202–211.

Jensen, R. T., & Miller, N. H. (2011). Do Consumer Price Subsidies Really Improve Nutrition ? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1205– 1223.

Kaushal, N., & Muchomba, F. M. (2015). How Consumer Price Subsidies affect Nutrition. World Development, 74, 25–42.

Kemenkorkesra. (2014). Keputusan menteri koordinator bidang kesejahteraan rakyat nomor 54 tahun 2014. Kementerian Koordinasi Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat.

Kochar, A. (2005). Can Targeted Food Programs Improve Nutrition ? An Empirical Analysis of India ’ s Public Distribution System. Economic

Development and Cultural Change, 54(1), 203–235.

Moeis, J. P. (2003). Indonesian Food Demand System: An Analysis of the Impacts of the Economic Crisis On Household Consumption and Nutritional Intake. UMI Dissertation Publishing, 1–216.

Moffitt, B. Y. R. (1989). Estimating the Value of an In-Kind Transfer : The Case of Food Stamps. Econometrica, 57(2), 385–409.

Moffitt, R. (1986). The Econometrics of Piecewise-Linear Budget Constraints A Survey and Exposition of the Maximum Likelihood Method. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 4(3), 317–328.

Murda, H. (2009). Dampak Kenaikan Harga Subsidi Beras Raskin terhadap Kesejahteraan dan Nilai Gizi Rumah Tangga Miskin. Universitas Indonesia.

Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. (2008). Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions (Tenth Edit). Mason, USA: Thomson South-Western.

Nurkhayani, E. (2011). Analisis Permintaan Pangan dan Gizi Rumahtangga di Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia.

Shaw, T. S., & Telidevara, S. (2014). Does food subsidy affect household nutrition ? Some evidence from the Indian Public Distribution System. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(1/2), 107–132.

Sulistyowati, R. W. (2013). Pengaruh Subsidi Beras Miskin pada Konsumsi Kalori Rumah Tangga Miskin. Universitas Indonesia.

Varian, H. R. (2005). Intermediate Microeconomics.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35448/jequ.v2i2.7168