ANALISIS SOAL MODUL LABORATORIUM FISIKA SEKOLAH I MENGGUNAKAN RACSH MODEL

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of problems that exist in the school lab module 1 using Racsh Model. The test was conducted on Physics Education Study Program Students of University of Papua Semester Even Semester 2016-2017. This research is descriptive research using quantitative approach. The results showed that 1) there is a question that is too easy (outlier) that is S17 and S38 and need to be revised. 2) There are 3 questions that have low power difference that is about S11, S17, and S38. 3) Reliability questions obtained 0.62 results in the weak category. 4) The results of analysis obtained value Raw variance 30.8% in both category and Unexplned variance value is 9.5%, so it can be concluded that the matter is valid constructively. 5) The results of content validity analysis show that: the degree of problem kesulitas only consists of 2 groups that is easy and difficult problem, the level of accuracy of the problem is in the category enough, there are problems that are not fit ie S50, S41, S44, S40, S37, S45, S31, S27, S28, S31, S42, S12, S20, there is a question that does not meet the Z-standard Output Value (ZSTD) criteria S50, there is a problem that does not meet the standard Point Value Correlation Value (Pt Mean Corr) is a matter of numbers S41, S42, S12, and S20 and there is a problem that has the value of Pt Mean Corr minus is a matter of no 41 which means the matter is confusing. For that reason S11, S17, S38, S50, S41, S44, S40, S37, S45, S36, S47, S43, S32, S27, S28, S31, S42, S12, S20 need to be revised.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas soal yang ada pada modul laboratorium sekolah 1 menggunakan Racsh Model. Pengujian dilakukan pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Papua Semester Genap 2016-2017. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) terdapat soal yang terlalu mudah (outlier) yaitu S17 dan S38 dan perlu direvisi. 2) Terdapat 3 soal yang memiliki daya beda yang rendah yaitu soal S11, S17, dan S38. 3) Reliabilitas soal diperoleh hasil 0,62 yaitu pada kategori lemah. 4) Hasil analisis diperoleh nilai Raw variance 30,8% pada kategori baik dan nilai Unexplned variance yaitu 9,5%, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa soal valid secara konstruk. 5) Hasil analisis validitas konten menunjukkan bahwa: tingkat kesulitas soal hanya terdiri dari 2 kelompok yaitu soal yang mudah dan sulit, tingkat ketelitian soal berada pada kategori cukup, terdapat soal yang tidak fit yaitu S50, S41, S44, S40, S37, S45, S36, S47, S43, S32, S27, S28, S31, S42, S12, S20, terdapat soal yang tidak memenuhi kriteria Nilai Output Z-standar (ZSTD) yaitu S50, terdapat soal yang tidak memenuhi standar Nilai Point Measure Correlation (Pt Mean Corr) yaitu soal nomor S41, S42, S12, dan S20 dan terdapat soal yang memiliki nilai Pt Mean Corr minus yaitu soal no 41 yang artinya soal tersebut membinggungkan. Untuk itu maka soal S11, S17, S38, S50, S41, S44, S40, S37, S45, S36, S47, S43, S32, S27, S28, S31, S42, S12, S20, perlu direvisi.