Pre-Service Teacher’s View towards 2013 Curriculum and School-based Curriculum

Anna Riana Suryanti Tambunan, Willem Saragih, Puan Suri Mira Annisa, Tiarnita M. S Siregar, Bahagia Saragih

Abstract


This study aims to discuss the views of pre-service teachers on the 2013 curriculum and KTSP. The implementation of the 2013 curriculum is very different from the previous curriculum. There are still many obstacles that significantly affect learning outcomes, both in terms of the media used, the assessment of the 2013 curriculum which is more complicated than the previous curriculum then the methods used to convey the learning material that has not been effective or not even following the learning material to communicate. This study used a qualitative descriptive method for two pre-service teachers who had the best GPA. In this study, researchers found that the 2013 curriculum was a new curriculum that followed the current technological era and also under the demands of the students' needs. Teacher candidates do not only learn how to understand teaching materials, but also how to apply these teaching materials in the teaching and learning process. In this study, researchers found that prospective teacher students faced obstacles in their application, for example in terms of classroom management and teaching preparation.

Keywords: Curriculum 2013; pre-service teachers; school-based curriculum 

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Department of National Education. (2003) Standard of Competence of English subject for Senior High School and Madrasyah Alyah. Jakarta. Curriculum Center, Balitbang: Department of National Education of Republic of Indonesia.

Education Ministerial Regulation. 2006. Standard of Content. Jakarta Department of National Education of Republic of Indonesia.

Darma, Agus. 2008. Indonesian Basic Education Curriculum: Current Content and Reform.

Hartoyo. 2011. Curriculum and Material Development: syllabus/course outline. Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.

Murdoch, K. & Hornsby, D. 1997. Planning curriculum connection-whole school planning for integrated curriculum. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

Malik, R. S., & Hamied, F. A. (2016). Research Methods: A guide for first time researchers. Bandung: UPI Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldan, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd edition). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Brown, J. D. 1995. The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pulishers.

Richards, J. C. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: University Press.

Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. 2000. Curriculum Based Evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd. ed). Belmon: Wadsworth and Thompson Learning Company.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v4i1.4936

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Journal of English Language Studies [JELS] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @ Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.  p-ISSN: 2527-7022 |  e-ISSN: 2541-5131



View My Stats