The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Based Virtual Class to Improve Student’s Logical Thinking Ability

Siti Romlah Noer Hodijah, Ria Sudiana, Dewi Murni

Abstract


The low logical thinking ability of students causes them to experience difficulties in making the reasoning of genetic concepts. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of scaffolding based virtual class to improve student’s logical thinking ability. Quasi experiment was used in this study. The population was the 4th semester students of Biology education of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education at one of University at Serang, Indonesia, Academic Year 2016/2017, taking the Genetics course. Samples were taken randomly. The student’s logical thinking ability was measured by using the Test of Logical Thinking Ability (TOLT). The students pretest results of logical thinking ability in the experimental and control classes show the same average value of 2.64 included in the transition category, whereas post test results show different values. The experimental class indicates an average grade of 6.41 and a control class of 4.13, although the average difference between the two groups is significantly different, but both still show the same category of initial formal. Based on Mann-Whitney statistical test results, there is a difference of logical thinking ability between the two treatment classes. This can be interpreted that learning by using scaffolding based virtual class is effective in improving student’s logical thinking ability.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Keywords


Virtual Class; Scaffolding; Logical Thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahar, M and Polat, M 2007, ‘The Science Topics Perceived Difficult by Pupils at Primary 6-8 Classes: Diagnosing the Problems and Remedy Suggestions’,Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1113-30

Bastable, SS & Dart, MA 2014, Development Stages of The Learner. Jones and Barlett Publisher.

Bayram, H and Comek, A 2009, ‘Examining the Relations Between Science Attitudes, Logical thinking ability, Information literacy and Academic Achievement through Internet Assisted Chemistry Education’. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. vol.1, pp. 1526–32.

Boujemaa, A, Pierre, C, Sabah, S, Salaheddine, K, Jamal, C & Abdellatif, C 2010, ‘University students’ conceptions about the concept of gene: Interest of historical approach’. US-China Education Review. vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 9-15.

Cook, JL and Cook, G 2005, Child Development Principles & Perspectives, Allyn & Bacon, Boston

Christine, MP, Knippels J, Waarlo AJ, & Boersma KT 2005, ‘Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics’, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp.108-112.

Hodijah, SRN, Lestari, ID, & Marianingsih, P 2012, ‘Keterampilan Klasifikasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi Melalui perkuliahan Berbasis Inkuiri pada konsep Magnoliopsida’, Jurnal penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta, LPPM Untirta, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 23-26.

Hughes, M & Hagie C 2005, ‘The Positive and Challenging Aspect Of Leaning Online and in Traditional Face to Face Classroom: A Student Perspective’, Journal of Special Education Technology, vol. 20, pp. 8-52.

Katminingsih, Y 2009, Vigotsky dan Teorinya dalam Mempengaruhi Desain Pembelajaran Matematika, Malang, STKIP PGRI Blitar.

Murni, D., Hodijah, SRN, & Sudiana, R 2016, ‘Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Sebagai Langkah Awal Pengembangan Virtual Class pada Mata Kuliah Genetika’, in Susilo, H, Indriwati, SE, Zubaidah, S, Irawati, MH, Praseto, TI, Dahlia, Suratno, Srihardiyastutianti, A, Lestari, U, Lukiati, B, Rohman, F, Suhadi, Amin, M, Gofur, A, Listyorini, & Oktarianti, R (eds.). Prosiding Seminar Nasional ke-3 Biologi IPA dan pembelajarannya,, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Puntambekar, S and Kolodner JL 2005, ‘Toward Implementing Distributed Scaffolding: Helping Students Learn Science from Design’, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 185–217.

Tobin, K. and Capie, W 1981, ‘Development and Validation of Group Test of Logical Thinking’, Education and Psychological Measurement, vol. 41, pp.413-424.

Valadines, NC 1996. Classification and Dichotomous Key (Tools For Teaching Identification). The Science Teacher, pp. 50-54.

Wiji, Liliasari, Sopandi, W, Martoprawiro, MAK 2014, ‘Kemampuan Berpikir Logis dan Mental Kimia Mahasiswa Calon Guru’, Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 147-156.

Wood, KC, Smith, H, & Grossniklaus, D. 2001. Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, viewed 27 May 2018,

Yenilmez, AS, Sungur & Tekkaya, C 2005, ‘Investigating Students’ Logical Thinking Abilities: The Effects Of Gender And Grade Level’. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, pp. 219-22.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v4i1.3041

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

All rights reserved. p-ISSN: 2477-1422 | e-ISSN: 2477-2038