APPLICATION OF ARGUMENT MAPPING METHODS TOWARD CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

siti mulya agnah

Abstract


This study aims to determine the results of critical thinking skills of high school students by applying the method of argument map on the material Circulatory System. The method used in this research is quasi experiment with Static Group Pretest-Posttest Design design through procurement of control class. The study population is XI MIPA SMAN 97 Jakarta with the sample of research as many as two classes, namely XI MIPA 1 and 3 which contains each of 36 students. The instrument used in this research is a description test. Based on data analysis of research results, the average value of pretest and posttest obtained in the control class of 28.89, while in the experimental class obtained at 25.08 and posttest of 38.67. The result of t-test of pretest and posttest of control class is obtained tcount (0,000) <ttabel (2,306) which is not significantly different, whereas in t-test result pretest and posttest of experiment class with tcount (25,528)> ttable (2,306) differ significantly. The test was continued with N-Gain calculation, where the control class obtained N-Gain of 0.4 and the experimental class obtained N-gain of 0.7. The N-Gain score criteria in the control class include the medium category and the experimental class included in the high category. From the results of this study can be concluded that the application of argument map method on the circulatory system material can improve the critical thinking ability of learners.


Keywords


peta argumen, berpikir kritis, sistem peredaran darah.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Arslan, Ramazan, Hakan Gulveren, & Erhan Aydin. 2014. Research on Critical Thinking Tendencies and Factor that Affect Critical Thinking of Higher Educations Students. International Journal of Business an Management, 5 (9): 43-59.

Budiarti, Nurul. 2015. Efektivitas Metode Diskusi Dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended Questions untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X SMA Muhammadiyah Kota Tegal. JRKPF UAD, 2 (1): 29-32.

Curto K & T Bayer. 2005. An Intersection of Critical Thingking and Communication Skillls. Journal of Biological Science 31(4):11-19.

Davies, W. Martin. 2010. Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping, and Argument Mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?. [tersedia dalam http://fbe.unimelb.edu.au (diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2017)].

Duda H J. 2010. Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum dan Asesmennya pada Konsep Sistem Ekskresi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI. Jurnal VOX Edukasi 1 (2): 29-39.

Dwyer, Michael H., & Ian S.. 2015. The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction on reflective judgement performance. Elsevier Journal, 16: 11-26.

Ennis, Robert H. 1985. A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43 (2): 44-48.

Fisher, Alec. 2009. Berpikir Kritis: sebuah pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Halpern. 1998. Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American. Psychologist, 53: 449–455,

Herlanti, Yanti. 2014. Analisis Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada Isu Sosiosaintifik Konsumsi Genetically Modified Organism (GMO). Journal pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3 (1): 51-59.

Ostwald, J. 2007. Argument mapping for critical thinking. [Tersedia pada: http://www.jostwald.com/argumentmapping/ostwaldhandout.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2017.]

Redhana, I W & Liliasari. 2008. Program Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Topik Laju Reaksi Untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Forum Kependidikan 27 (2): 103-112.

Redhana, I W. 2010. Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis peta argumen terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada topik laju reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 43 (17): 141-148.

Rotherham, A. J., & Daniel W. (2009). 21¬¬st century skills: The challenges ahead. Journal of Educational Leadership, 67(1): 16-21.

Sbarski, P., van Gelder, T., Marriott, K., Prager, D. & Bulka, A. 2008. Visualizing Argument Structure. in G. Bebis et. al. (Eds). London: Springer-Verlag.

Sugiono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syaifudin, Ahmad & Santi Pratiwi T. U. 2011. Penalaran Argumen Siswa Dalam Wacana Tulis Argumentatif Sebagai Upaya Membudayakan Berpikir Kritis Di SMA. Lingua Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, (7): 65-76

Toulmin, Stephen E., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.

van Gelder, T. 2007. The rationale for Rationale TM. Law, ProbabilityandRisk, 6, 23–42. [tersedia pada http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgm032 (diakses tanggal 22 Agustus 2017)].

Zubaidah, AD. Corebima, & Mistianah. 2015. Asesmen Berpikir Kritis Terintegrasi Tes Essay. [tersedia dalam http://pbio.uad.ac.id/unduh/prosiding-symbion-2015.pdf (diakses tanggal 5 Agustus 2017)].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i1.2843

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 BIODIDAKTIKA, JURNAL BIOLOGI DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA