jurnal pendidikan teknik mesin

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

VANOS Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education contains the results of research related to the development of teaching, learning, policy, and evaluation in the field of mechanical engineering, automotive, vocational education, and vocational high school.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. Language used in this journal is English or Indonesia.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Etics

Journal VANOS (P-ISSN 2528-2611 da E-ISSN 2528-2700) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa in collaboration with Asosiasi Dosen dan Guru Vokasi Indonesia (ADGVI) - Association of Indonesian Vocational Educators (AIVE). The publication ethics of VANOS Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education as follows:

  1. The manuscript presents complete and original information as well as objective data.
  2. Quotation source and reference cited in the manuscript must be informed.
  3. The manuscript is written concisely and clearly for efficiency.
  4. The manuscript is, at the same time, not being sent to and has never been published by another journal.
  5. Everyone involved in the research (students & supervisors) should be included in the team of writers.
  6. A writer who passed away should be included as a co-author.
  7. Authors must avoid fabrication (make up the data and results of a study).
  8. Authors must avoid falsification (manipulating research materials, equipment, process, changing the data or intentionally discarding data or results).
  9. Authors should avoid Plagiarism (taking ideas, processes, results or words without citing the sources).
  10. Authors should avoid Fragmentation (breaking research data into different themes of manuscript so that the discussion cannot become in-depth)
  11. The manuscript should not use copied materials from another article without permission.
  12. All materials/quotation earned from previous research, involving similar writers related to previous publications must be cited properly.

 

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia does not charge for Article Processing Charges (APCs) or submission charges.

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

This journal has a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software "Turnitin" to check the authenticity article. 

 

Journal Scientific Statement

The articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA are scientifically proved following the code of ethics of scientific publication. The code of ethics itself upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely, (1) Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in public management), (2) Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author), and (3) Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication. The articles published also follow the certain procedures or orders, such as double blind review and revision process that consistent with the journal’s regular review, to ensure that the quality is maintained properly.

 

Retraction

The papers published in Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (JPTK) will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.