PENGARUH PENEKANAN ANGGARAN PADA KINERJA APARATUR DENGAN MODEL PERENCANAAN ANGGARAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL PEMEDIASI

Dwi Witnyaningsih

Abstract


This study aims to examine between budget emphasis, differentiation strategies, budget planning models and performance. Data collected by using questionnaire gave to the officials in SKPD in Banten Province, such as the Head of Department, secretary of the SKPD, and head of subsection/head of sub-field, and the section head. The measurement of data using a Likert scale of 7. Tools of analysis using Partial Least Square (PLS) 2.0. The results show that the role of budgeting planning model as an intervening variable in the relationship between budget emphasis, differentiation strategy and performance.     

Keyword : budget emphasis, differentiation strategy, and performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, Nana Herdiana. 2015. Manajemen Strategi Pemasaran. Cetakan Pertama. Bandung : CV.Pustaka Setia

Andvig et all (2001). Corruptions A revew of contemporary research. Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights Report R. 2001:7: Web : http//www.cmi.no.

Afifi, et.al. (2016). Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran, Partisipasi Anggran, Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu & Call For Papers Unisbank (SENDI_U) KE-2 Tahun 2016 Kajian Multi Disiplin Ilmu dalam Pengembangan IPTEKS untuk Mewujudkan Pembangunan Nasional Semesta Berencan (PNSB) sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing Global. ISBN: 978-979-3649-96-2. Unisbank Semarang, 28 Juli 2016.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Baiman, S. (1982). Agency Research in Managerial accounting: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Literature, 154-213

Brownell, P. (1982a). The role of accounting data in performance evaluation budgetary participation, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research. 20(1): 12-27.

Brownell, P. (1982b). Notes: A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control. The Accounting Review. LVII(4): pp. 766-777.

Brownell, P. dan M. Mc. Innes, (1986), Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review , 61:587-600.

Brownell, P. (1983), “Leadership style, budgetary participation and managerial behavior”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 307-21.

Brownell, P. and Dunk, A.S. (1991), “Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: some methodological issues and empirical investigation”, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 693-703.

Brownell, P. and Hirst, M. (1986), “Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation, and task uncertainty: Tests of a three-way interaction”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 241-249.

Christensen ,Jorgen Gronnegrad.1992. Hierarchical and contractual approaches to budgetary reform. Journal of theoretical politics 4(1):67-91.

Chong M. Lau and Jason Chong (2002). The Effect of Budget Emphasis, Participation and Organizational Commitment on Job Satisfaction : Evidance from The Financial Services Sector. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Volume 5, pages 183-211 . ISBN: 0-7623-0953-9. Copyright © 2002 by Elsevier Science Ltd .

Chong M. Lau. (2001). The Interactive Effects of Emphasis on Tight Budget Targets and Cost Control on Budgetary Performance. Pacific Accounting Review - Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2001.

Cooper, D. and Hopper, T. (2007), “Critical theorizing in management accounting research”, in C.S. Chapman, A.G. Hopwood and M.D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of management accounting research, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 207-245.

Covaleski et al., 2003. Budgeting Research: Three Theoritical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Intergration, Journal of Management Accounting Research.

David, Fred, R. 2011. Strategic Management Manajemen Strategi Konsep, Edisi 12, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Daly Rustamblin, Armanu Thoyib, Djumilah Zain. (2011). Pengaruh Strategi Generik terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi pada Bank Umum) TERAKREDITASI SK DIRJEN DIKTI NO. 66b/DIKTI/KEP/2011 ISSN: 1693-5241

Dini Suci Ramadhani dan DR. Ratni Prima Lita, SE,MM. Pengaruh Strategi Diferensiasi Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing ( Studi Kasus Pada Konsumen Damarindo Digital Printing di Padang)

Davies, F., Goode, M., Mazanec, J. and Moutinho, L. (1999), “LISREL and neural network modeling: Two comparison studies”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp.249-261.

Donaldson, L. (2001), The Contingency theory of organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Dunk, A. S. April 1993, The Effect of Budget Emphasis And Information Asymmetry on The Relation Between Budgetary Participation and Slack. The Accounting Review. pp. 400-410.

Dunk, A.S. (1989), “Budget emphasis, budgetary participation and managerial performance: A note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14 No. 4, 321-324.

Fozzard, Adrian .2001. The Basic Budgetng Problem: Approach to Resource Allocation in The Public Sector and Their Implications For Pro Poor Budgeting. Center For Aid and Public Expenditure, Overses Deveopment Institute (ODI). Working Paper 147. Diunduh pada http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications opinionfiles/2069.pdf.

Gilardi, Fabrizio.2001. Principal agent models go to Europe:Indeendent regulatory agencies as ultimate of delegation. Paper preentd at the ECPR 172 GeneralConference, Canterbury (UK), 6-8 September 2001. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.202.2258.pdf

Giri. (2014). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran pada Kinerja Manajerial dengan Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural, dan Komitmen Tujuan Anggaran sebagai Variabel Pemediasi.

Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Govindarajan, V. 1986. Impact of Participation in The Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalitic and Contingency Perspective. Decision Sciences 17: 496-516.

Hidayat Setiadi. (2013). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial melalui Komitmen Organisasi dan Budget Emphasis sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus pada SKPD Pemerintah Kabupaten Boyolali).

Hirst, M.K. (1981). Accounting information and the evaluation of subordinate performance: A situational approach. The Accounting Review. 56 (10): 771-784

Hirst, M.K. (1983). Reliance on accounting performance measures, task uncertainty, and dysfunctional behavior: some extensions. Journal of Accounting Research. 21(2): 596-605

Hopwood, A.G. (1972), “An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 156-182.

Imam Ghozali dan Hengky Latan, (2012), “Partial Least Squares : Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program Smart PLS 2.0 M3, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang-Jawa Tengah.

Kenis, I. (1979), “Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 707-721.

Lau, C.M. (2001), The Interactive Effects of Emphasis on Tight Budget Targets and Cost Control on Budgetary Performance”. Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 13 Iss1 pp. 59 - 84

Lau, C.M. and Tan, S.L.C. (2003), “The effects of participation and job-relevant information on the relationship between evaluative style and job satisfaction”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 17-34.

Lupia, Arthur & Mathew McCubbins. 2000. Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. European Journal of Political Research 37: 291-307. Diunduh pada http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1007068904236?LI=true

Karsam. (2015). Pengaruh Penekanan Anggaran dan Motivasi Terhadap Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Anggaran Dengan Senjangan Anggaran Serta Dampaknya Pada Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Pada Yayasan Pendidikan dan Koperasi Propinsi Banten). Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis Vol. 2, No. 1, Maret 2015 Hlm. 29-44

Kung, Fan-Hua, Cheng-Li Huang dan Chia-Ling Cheng. 2013. An Examination of the Relationships Among Budget Emphasis, Budget Planning Models and Performance. Department of Accounting, Tamkang University and Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.

Kenis, I. (1979), “Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 707-21.

Lane,Jane Eric. 2003a. Management and public organization: The principal agent framework. university of Geneva ad National University of Singapore. Working Paper. Diunduh pada www.spp.nus.edu.sg/Handler.ashx?path=Data/Site/SiteDocuments/wp/2003 /wp45.pdf

Lane,Jane Eric. 2003b. Relevace of the principal agent framework to public policy and implementation. University of Geneva and National University of Singapore. Working Paper. Diunduh pada www.spp.nus.edu.sg/Handler.ashx?path=Data/Site/SiteDocuments/wp/2003/wp32.pdf

Lupia, Arthur & Mathew McCubbins. 2000. Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. European Journal of Political Research 37: 291-307. Diunduh pada http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1007068904236?LI=true

Luft, J., & Shields, M. (2003). Mapping management accounting : making structural models from theory – based empirical research. Accounting Organizations and Society, 28, 169 – 250.

Mardiasmo. 2005. Akuntansi Sektor Publik Edisi 2. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta

Merchant, K.A. (1981), “The design of the corporate budgeting system: Influences on managerial behavior and performance”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 813-829.

Merchant, K.A. and Simons, R. (1986), “Research and control in complex organizations: An overview”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 5, pp. 183-203.

Merchant, K.A. (1989), Rewarding results: Motivating profit center manager, Harvard Business School, Boston.

Merchant, K.A. and Van der Stede, W.A. (2007), Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (2nd Ed.), Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow, England.

M. Nizarul Alim. (2008). Efektivitas Perpaduan Komponen Anggaran dalam Prosedur Anggaran: Pengujian Kontinjensi Matching. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 10, NO. 2, November 2008: 69-76

Mia, L. (1988), “Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 465-475.

Milani, K. (1975), “The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes-a field study”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 274-285.

Michael Malcolm. 2011. Moral Hazard and the Principal-Agent Problem. http://gatton.uky.edu/faculty/sandford/401_f12/moralhazard.pdf

Moe, T.M. 1984. The new economic of organization. American journal of political science 28(5):739-777.Diunduh pada http://eppam.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/6/2/5562069/new_economics_of_org anization.pdf

Mulyadi. 1993. Akuntansi Biaya Edisi ke-5. Yogyakarta: BP-STIE YKPN.

Mulyadi. 2011. Auditing Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Nurkhamid, M. (2008). Implementasi Inovasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah Vol. 3, No. 1, Oktober 2008 Hal. 45 – 76

Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York. Otley, D.T. (1978), “Budget use and managerial performance”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 122-149.

Otley, D.T. (1978), “Budget use and managerial performance”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 122-49.

Otley, D.T. (1980), “The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 413-428.

Osborne, david, and Ted Gaebler, 1992, Reinventing Government : How Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector, Reading, Massachusetts : Addisom Wesley Publishing Co. Inc.

Petere Thomas J & Waterman Jr, Robert H (1982), In Search of Excellence, New Yoric Harper

Puspita, et.al. (2016). Pengaruh Budget dengan Planning Budget Model dan Dampaknya Pada Kinerja UmkmlManajerial (Pada UMKM Sentra Sepatu Cibaduyut Bandung). Prosiding Akuntansi ISSN: 2460-6561

Raghunandan. et.al. (2012). Examining the Behavioural Aspects of Budgeting with particular emphasis on Public Sector/Service Budgets. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 3 No. 14 (Special Issue – July 2012)

Ratmono,D. Et.al. (2012). Model Mediasi dan Moderasi dalam Hubungan Antara Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen, Inovasi dan Kinerja.

Sardjito B, Muthaher O. 2007. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah, Budaya Organisasi dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating, SNA X, Makassar.

Shields, J.F. and Shields, M.D. (1998), “Antecedents of participative budgeting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 49-76.

Shields, M.D., Deng, F. J. and Kato, Y. (2000), “The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct- and indirect-effects models”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 185-202.

Smith & Bertozzi . 1998. Principal Agent: An Explanatory model of public budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Manageent (fall)” 325-353.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1999. Economics of the Public Sector. Third edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Strom, K. (2000). Deegation and Accuntability in Parlementary democracies. European journal of Plitical Rsearch 37: 261-289. Diunduh pada http://www.uh.edu/democracy/stromp.pdf.

Sumenge. (2013). Analisis Efektifitas dan Efisiensi Pelaksanaan Angaran Belanja Bada Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (BAPPEDA) Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal EMBA Vol.1 No.3 September 2013, Hal. 74-81. ISSN 2303-1174

Susanto. (2009). Intensitas Kompetisi Pasar dan Budget Emphasis pada Hubungan antara Partisipasi dan senjangan Anggaran. Jumal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Volume 6 Nomor 2, Desember 2009

Young, S.M. (1985). Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Assymetric Informations on Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research 23. pp. 829-842.

Van der Stede, W.A. (2001), “Measuring tight budgetary control”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 119-137. Van der Stede, W.A. (2003), “The effect of national culture on management control and incentive system design in multi-business firms: Evidence of intracorporate isomorphism”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 263-285.

Von hagen, Jurgen. (2003). Budegting institutions and public spending, in Shah, Anwar (ed). 2003. Handbook on Public Sector Performance Reviews. Volume 1: Ensuring Accountability When There Is No Bottom Line. Washington, DC: The Worls Bank. Diunduh pada http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.201.5244.pdf.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35448/jratirtayasa.v2i1.4885

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Tirtayasa disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.