Virtual Debate Community: A Study on Students’ Perception and Improvement in English Debating Skills

Anggit Laesa Oktaviani

Abstract


Advancements in technology have significantly enhanced global learning, particularly in debate. With debating competitions like the National University Debating Championships (NUDC) becoming mandatory, universities face the challenge of preparing skilled debaters. The advent of virtual debate communities through platforms such as Zoom, WhatsApp, and Discord has addressed logistical issues like scheduling and finding sparring partners. This research, utilizing qualitative methods including questionnaires, interviews, and documentation, reveals that students appreciate these platforms for improving their English and debating skills, expanding their networks, and boosting motivation, and create an effective platform for practices. However, internet connectivity issues often hinder the effectiveness of feedback and engagement. Future research should focus on solutions for connectivity problems, compare the effectiveness of different virtual platforms, and explore the long-term impact and experiences of diverse student groups.

.

Keywords: Virtual debate communities; students’ perception and improvement; English Debating Skills.


Keywords


Virtual debate communities; students’ perception and improvement; English Debating Skills.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsayed, A. A., & Althaqafi, A. S. (2022). Students' Perceptions of Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Saudi Arabian Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00346-2.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., ... & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027

Connel, J. P., Ghodsi, S., & Zhang, L. (2013). Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments: An Investigation of Effective Practices. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 2(1), 28-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijetl.2013.03.002.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darmawan, D., Siregar, H., & Firstiandi, S. U. (2023, September). Utilization of E-Module as Blended Learning Source at C-Package Equivalence Education Program PKBM Abdi Pertiwi Serang. In PICEI 2022: Proceedings of the 1st Pedagogika International Conference on Educational Innovation, PICEI 2022, 15 September 2022, Gorontalo, Indonesia (p. 52). European Alliance for Innovation.

Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Mostert, M. (2005). Enhancing Student Learning through Online Assessment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 1-16. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v9i3.1833.

Hongsuchon, T., Wacharasin, C., Homchampa, P., & Watthayu, N. (2022). The Impact of Service Quality on Online Learning Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 657-673. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-022-10063-8

Kennedy, R. (2007). In-class debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. *International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19*(2), 183-190.

Kuhn, D. (2018). Education for thinking. Harvard University Pres

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. *US Department of Education*.

McConnell, T.J., Parker, J.M., Eberhardt, J. et al. Virtual Professional Learning Communities: Teachers’ Perceptions of Virtual Versus Face-to-Face Professional Development. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 267–277

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mutalib, M. A., Ahmad, R. H., & Rashid, A. H. A. (2022). Students' Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Higher Education in Malaysia. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(6), 54-69. DOI: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i6.5170

Mutaqin, M. F. T. (2020). Eksplorasi Kesejahteraan Subjektif Warga Belajar Pendidikan Kesetaraan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rosmilawati, I. (2018). Jalan Panjang Menuju Sekolah Alternatif: Refleksi Pengalaman Remaja Kurang Beruntung dalam Meraih Pendidikan. Jurnal Eksistensi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (E-Plus), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/e-plus.v2i1.2952

Rosmilawati, I., Suherman, & Darmawan, D. (2020). The Benefit of Prison Education : Inmate Students ‟ Self Reflection. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 443(ISET 2019), 592–595

Snider, A. (2002). The Code of the Debater: Introduction to Policy Debating. International Debate Education Association.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. Guilford Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.