FORGING A PATH FORWARD: SAFEGUARDING INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES FROM THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Olivia Allyana; Rachma Indriyani

doi:10.51825/tjil.v3i2.25388

FORGING A PATH FORWARD: SAFEGUARDING INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES FROM THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Olivia Allyana, Rachma Indriyani

Abstract

This article examines the effects of ‘climate change’ on indigenous communities and the

safeguarding of their rights, with a focus on the “Daniel Billy et.al v. Australia” case ‘climate change’ poses severe threats to ‘indigenous peoples’' livelihoods and traditions, yet they also contribute significantly to mitigating its impacts. Utilizing normative legal research methods, including statutory and case law analysis, it evaluates the protection of indigenous rights by the UNHRC. The analysis highlights the significance of the “UNHRC”'s decision in “Daniel Billy et.al v. Australia”, which represents a milestone in international law regarding ‘climate change’ 's repercussions on human rights. While non-binding, the ruling grants access and establishes a crucial precedent for enforcing indigenous claims against states failing to safeguard their rights. It has influenced national legal frameworks and guided interpretations of indigenous rights. Considering subsequent practices in applying human rights treaties and utilizing “UNHRC” rulings as interpretive aids are essential. This analysis aims to deepen comprehension of the challenges and prospects in safeguarding the rights of climate-affected indigenous populations on the global stage.

Keywords

Climate Change; Indigenous People; Treaty Body; Human Rights.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Journal

International Law Association, “International Human Rights Law and Practice”, (Berlin Conference: 2004)

Linda Etchart. “The Role of Indigenous Peoples in Combating Climate Change.” Palgrave Communications, 2017, 2.

Maria Antonia. “Climate Change and Indigenous Groups: The Rise of Indigenous Voices in Climate Litigation.” E Public Law Journal 9, no. 3 (2022): 213.

Mechlem, Kerstin. “Treaty Bodies and the Interpretation of Human Rights Interpretation of Human Rights.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 42, 2009. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol42/iss3/4.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. “HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL,” n.d.

Open Society Justice Initiative. “Implementing International and Regional Human Rights Decisions From Judgment to Justice,” 2010.

Principi, Kate Fox. “Implementation of UN Treaty Body Decisions: A Brief Insight for Practitioners.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 12, no. 1 (2020): 185–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/JHUMAN/HUAA013.

Rosanne van Alebeek & André Nollkaemper. “The Legal Status of Deision by Human Rights Treaty Bodies in National Law.” ACIL Research Paper No 2011-02, 2011, 79.

Spiegel, Brett, Phi Finney, and Mcdonald Tel. Pabai Pabai and Guy Paul Kabai v. Commonwealth of Australia (2021).

Books

Bambang Sunggono. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. 13th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2012.

Bernadinus Steni & Mumu Muhajir. Hukum, Perubahan Iklim Dan REDD. Jakarta: HuMa, 2010.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. 6th ed. Kencana, 2010.

Website

Human Rights Committee. Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 3624/2019 (n.d.).

Inter-govenmental Panel on Climate Change. “Climate Change 2023 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.,” 2023.

United Nations General Assembly. “Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/72/155,” 2017.

United Nations Human Rights Office of High Commissioner. “The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System Facts Sheet No. 30.” New York and Geneva, 2012.

Urgenda-Foundation-v-State-of-Netherlands (n.d.).

UN Environment Programme. Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review. United Nations Environment Programme, 2023. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43008.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v3i2.25388