Profile of Science Inquiry Literacy (SIL) achievements of pre-service physics teacher using rasch model measurements
Abstract
Pre-service physics teachers must have Scientific Inquiry Literacy (SIL) to prepare to teach physics. This research aims to describe the SIL profile of Pre-service physics teachers using the Rasch model. The mixed method with Convergent Parallel Design was chosen for this research. The mean value of the knowledge aspect is 6.1 (the top score is 35). Person measures -1.96, person separation 0.45, and person reliability 0.17. This condition shows that the consistency of the answers is still low, and the ability is low. The mean value, person measure, and separation of the skill aspect are 10.8 (the top score is 39), -1.10, and 0.00. This condition shows low ability and low diversity. The mean value for the attitude aspect is 79.5 (the top score is 108). Person size, separation, and reliability are 1.33, 2.01, and 0.8. This condition indicates a high ease of agreement on items with a wide variety and a good consistency of answers. The interviews and lesson plan analysis results show that pre-service physics teachers have yet to become accustomed to applying scientific inquiry in learning. Thus, the SIL in the knowledge and skills aspects of and the ability to design inquiry teaching still needs to be improved.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st-century skills, and learning attitudes through an open-inquiry learning model in Physics. JOTSE, 11(1), 30-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1004
AlMamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695
Astuti, S. R. D., Sari, A. R. P., & Tyas, R. A. (2020). Educational LPTK, Non-educational LPTK, and Non-LPTK Students' Intention to Become Teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6676-6683. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081232
Azhar, D. B., & Chusnana, I. Y. (2022). Development of interactive learning media as an alternative to improve students' conceptual understanding and motivation on the temperature and heat topics. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 132-145.
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st-century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-12.
Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Advances in Rasch analyses in the human sciences (pp. 287-302). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5_16.
Boone, W.J., Staver, J.R., dan Yale, M.S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M., & Bugallo, M. F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
Çilekrenkli, A., & Kaya, E. (2023). Learning science in context: Integrating a holistic approach to nature of science in the lower secondary classroom. Science & Education, 32(5), 1435-1469.
Darman, D. R. (2021). Online problem-based learning (OPBL) is assisted by simulation media in basic physics learning to improve creative thinking skills. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v7i1.10008
Darman, D. R., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Wibowo, F. C. (2024). Development and Validation of Scientific Inquiry Literacy Instrument (SILI) Using Rasch Measurement Model. Education Sciences, 14(3), 322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030322
Etkina, E., Brookes, D. T., & Planinsic, G. (2020). Investigative science learning environment: learn physics by practicing science. Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice, 359-383.
Fox, M. F., Zwickl, B. M., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2020). Preparing for the quantum revolution: What is the role of higher education?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020131. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020131
Gandolfi, E., Ferdig, R. E., & Soyturk, I. (2023). Exploring the learning potential of online gaming communities: An application of the Game Communities of Inquiry Scale. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1374-1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027171
Georgiou, Y., Tsivitanidou, O., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Learning experience design with immersive virtual reality in physics education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3051-3080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10055-y
Granikov, V., Hong, Q. N., Crist, E., & Pluye, P. (2020). Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 101003.
Guntara, Y., Saefullah, A., Ruhiat, Y., & Subaedi, A. N. (2023). Development of visual thinking strategy in augmented reality (ViTSAR) to facilitate visual literacy skills on magnetic field material. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2).
Hikmah, F. N., Sukarelawan, M. I., Nurjannah, T., & Djumati, J. (2021). Elaboration of high school student’s metacognition awareness on heat and temperature material: Wright map in Rasch model. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 172-182.
Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between science process skills and scientific attitudes of students towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.600979
Krasnova, L. A., & Shurygin, V. Y. (2020). Blended learning of physics in the context of the professional development of teachers. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2020.103814
Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Krüger, D., & van Driel, J. (2020). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ scientific reasoning competencies. Research in Science Education, 50, 2305-2329.
Kurniawan, D. A., Sukarni, W., & Hoyi, R. (2021). Assessing Students' Attitudes towards Physics through the Application of Inquiry and Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Models in High Schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 439-450.
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of research in science teaching, 51(1), 65-83.
Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020111.
Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., ... & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in inquiry learning. Instr Sci 46, 77–104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9437-x
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, J. S., & Enderle, P. J. (2023). Scientific inquiry literacy: The missing link on the continuum from science literacy to scientific literacy. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 749-782). Routledge.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J., (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. InPaper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) international conference. Baltimore, MD.
Septiyanto, R. F., & Darman, D. R. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar Terhadap High Order Thinking Skill Mahasiswa. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v4i1.3114
Spernes, K., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Scientific methods assignments as a basis for developing a profession-oriented inquiry-based learning approach in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928628
Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H. F., ... & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24.
Yusmanila, Y., & Zaturrahmi, Z. (2020). Introduction to the development of integrated science teaching materials based on inquiry labs to improve students' science literacy. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v6i2.8803
Zhu, L., Sun, D., Luo, M., Liu, W., & Xue, S. (2023). Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Design Performance in Laboratory Class: The Inquiry-Based Design Thinking Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10050-3
Zoechling, S., Hopf, M., Woithe, J., & Schmeling, S. (2022). Students’ interest in particle physics: conceptualisation, instrument development, and evaluation using Rasch theory and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(15), 2353-2380.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v10i1.22769
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Gravity has been indexed by:
_Kecil1.jpg)
| |
      |
| Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika is publihed by Department of Physics Education, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa jointly with Physical Society of Indonesia (PSI) | |
 | Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Copyright © 2020, Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika. |
