Fostering Scientific Creativity in Teaching and Learning Science in Schools: A Systematic Review

Rubaaiah Sidek, Lilia Halim, Nor Aishah Buang, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad

Abstract


Fostering creativity among the students will result in the production of a skillful workforce and human capital in the future. Creativity is a concept that has its roots in specific knowledge domains or disciplines including scientific creativity that is specific to science. This article attempts to fill the gap in understanding and identifying the factors and pedagogical approaches that influence and facilitate the effort to foster scientific creativity in science teaching and learning in schools. Thus, the questions arise of what pedagogical approaches and factors that foster students’ scientific creativity as well as support the teaching and learning in science classrooms. A systematic review of 30 studies was conducted to investigate effective interventions and variables that influence scientific creativity among students in school science classrooms. Pedagogical approaches and strategies such as teaching creative thinking techniques, problem-based, project-based, model-based, ICT-based, integrated STEM-based, and collaborative learning were found to improve scientific creativity among students. Meanwhile, students’ factors, teachers’ factors, and environmental factors were identified to facilitate the inculcation of creativity in science teaching and learning. This review suggests that the role of teachers is crucial in fostering scientific creativity in the science classrooms and there is a need to study teachers’ beliefs and practices in real settings. Also, future studies could also focus on identifying constraining factors that may hinder the fostering of scientific creativity by teachers in the classrooms.


Keywords


Scientific Creativity; Science Education; Fostering Creativity; Creative Thinking Methods; School Science

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkanat, Ç. and Gökdere, M 2018, ‘The effect of academic involvement and school climate as perceived by gifted students in terms of talent , creativity , and motivation in science ’, Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1167–74.

Alsahou, H 2015, Teachers ’ beliefs about creativity and practices for fostering creativity in science classrooms in the State of Kuwait, PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, London.

Andiliou, A. and Murphy, P. K 2010, ‘Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research’, Educational Research Review, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 201–19.

Anna Craft 2002, Creativity and early years education: A Lifewide foundation. Continuum studies in lifelong learning. London, United Kingdom.

Astutik, S., Mahdiannur, Suliyanah, and B K Prahani, BK. 2019, ‘Improving science process skills of junior high school students through the implementation of collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model in physics learning’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol 1171 no. 1.

Astutik, S. and Prahani, B. K 2018, ‘The practicality and effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning (ccl) model by using phet simulation to increase students’ scientific creativity’, International Journal of Instruction, vol. 11 no. 4, pp. 409–24.

Bereczki, O. and Karpati, A 2018, ‘Teachers ’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture : A systematic review of the recent research literature’, Educational Research Review vol. no. 23, pp 25-56.

Cevher, A. H., Ertekin, P. and Koksal, M. S 2014, ‘Investigation of scientific creativity of eighth grade gifted students’, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, vol. 1 no. 4 pp. 1-6.

Davies, D., Snape, D.J, Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., Howe, A 2013, ‘Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review’, Thinking Skills and Creativity. Elsevier Ltd, vol. 8 no. 1, pp. 80–91.

Davies, D. Snape, D.J, Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., Howe, A 2014, ‘The roles and development needs of teachers to promote creativity: A systematic review of literature’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 41, pp. 34-41.

Dehaan, R. L. 2011, ‘Teaching Creative Science Thinking’, Education Forum, vol. 334 (December), pp. 1499–500.

Dikici, A. and Soh, K. 2015, ‘Indexing creativity fostering teacher behaviour : Replication and modification’, Higher Education of Social Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–10.

Feist, G. J 1998, ‘A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity’, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, vol. 2 no. 4, pp. 290–309.

Gardner, H 1983, Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New York.

Halim, L., Abdullah, S.I.S.S. & Meerah, T.S.M 2014, ‘Students’ perceptions of their science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 227-37.

Hetherington, L., Chappell, K., Keene, H.R., Wren,H., Cukurova, M., Hathaway, C., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F 2019, ‘International educators’ perspectives on the purpose of science education and the relationship between school science and creativity’, Research in Science and Technological Education, pp. 1–23.

Hu, W. and Adey, P 2002, ‘A scientific creativity test for secondary school students’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 389–403.

Hu, W.Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan,C., Meyer, W., Kaufman, J.C 2013, ‘Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program’, Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 47 no. 1, pp. 3–21.

Hur, Y. J. and Lee, S. Y 2015, ‘Analysis of instruction fostering creativity in prospective natural sciences and engineering teachers’, Information (Japan), vol. 18 no. 3, pp. 867–72.

Wicaksono, I, Wasis and Madlazim 2017, ‘The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (vs-tm) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 16 no. 4, p. 13.

Jang, S. J 2009, ‘Exploration of secondary students’ creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum’, Computers and Education. Elsevier Ltd, vol. 52 no. 1, pp. 247–55.

Kang, D., Park, J. and Hong, H 2015, ‘Changes in the number of ideas depending on time when conducting scientific creativity activities', Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 448–59.

Laius, A. and Rannikmae, M 2011, ‘Impact on student change in scientific creativity and socio- scientific reasoning skills from teacher collaboration and gains from professional in-service’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 127–38.

Lin, C.Hu, W., Adey,P., Shen, J. 2003, ‘The influence of cultural factors on scientific production’, Research in Science Education, vol. 33, no. 33, pp. 137–46.

Liu, S. C. and Lin, H. shyang 2014, ‘Primary teachers’ beliefs about scientific creativity in the classroom context’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, no.10, pp 1551–67.

Mierdel, J. and Bogner, F. X 2019, ‘Is creativity, hands-on modeling and cognitive learning gender-dependent?’, Thinking Skills and Creativity. Elsevier Ltd, vol. 31, pp. 91–102.

Mohamad Sattar, R., Nosrsalehan, Z., Lilia, H., Roseamnah, A.R 2018 ‘Impact of integrated stem smart communities program on students scientific creativity’, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special issue November, pp. 80–9.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The PRISMA Group, 2009, ' Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement', PLoS Med. vol. 6, no. 7.

Mohtar, L. E. and Halim, L 2015, ‘Konstruk Kreativiti Saintifik Bagi Kajian Dalam Pendidikan Fizik Sekolah Menengah : Satu Sorotan Literatur’, in Sixth International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education. CoSMEd 2015 16 – 19 November 2015, Penang, Malaysia.

Moote, J 2019, ‘Investigating the Longer-Term Impact of the CREST Inquiry-Based Learning Programme on Student Self-regulated Processes and Related Motivations: Views of Students and Teachers’, Research in Science Education, vol. 49, no.1, pp. 265–94.

Mukhopadhyay, R 2012, ‘Whether aptitude in physics, scientific attitude, and deep approach to study explain achievement in physics significantly – An investigation’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–63.

Mukhopadhyay, R 2013 ‘Measurement of creativity in physics - A brief review on related tools’, IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 45–50.

Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, K., Kettler, T 2016, ‘Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature’, Thinking Skills and Creativity. Elsevier Ltd, vol. 21, pp. 9–30.

Mustika, M., Maknun, J. and Feranie, S. 2019, ‘Case study : analysis of senior high school students scientific creative, critical thinking and its correlation with their scientific reasoning skills on the sound concept’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1157, no. 3.

Newton, D. P. and Newton, L. D 2009, ‘Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science’, Research in Science and Technological Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45-60.

Newton, L. & Newton, D 2016, ‘Elementary school science creative thinking and teaching for creativity in elementary school science’, Gifted and Talented International, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 111-24 .

Osman. K, Hamid A, S.H, Hassan, A 2009, ‘Standard setting: inserting domain of the 21st century thinking skills into the existing science curriculum in Malaysia’, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, no.1 (2009), pp. 2573–2577.

Park, J 2010, ‘Practical ways for teaching and evaluation scientific creativity’, XIV IOSTE Symposium: Socio-cultural and Human Values in Science and Technology Education. Bled, Slovenia.

Qian, J. and Yu, J 2012, ‘Students creativity modeling with gene expression programming’, International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, ICCSEE 2012, vol. 3, pp. 582–85.

Rahman, S 2014, ‘Using Problem-focused Approach to Nurture Creativity and Entrepreneurship among Students’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 191 (2015), pp 2782 – 6

Rozi, N.E,. and Halim, L 2018, ‘Sorotan literatur: Instrumen pengukuran kreativiti saintifik dalam sains’, International Conference on Global Education Vi, (May), pp. 163–79.

Rubini, B., Permanasari, A. and Yuningsih, W. 2018, ‘Learning Multimedia Based on Science Literacy on the Lightning Theme’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 89.

Ruiz, M. J., Bermejo, R., Ferrando, M., Prieto, M.D., Sainz, M 2014, ‘Intelligence and scientific-Creative thinking: Their convergence in the explanation of students’ academic performance’, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 283–302.

Şahin, F 2016, ‘General intelligence, emotional intelligence and academic knowledge as predictors of creativity domains: A study of gifted students’, Cogent Education. Cogent, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16.

Said-metwaly, S 2017, ‘Approaches to measuring creativity : A systematic literature review ’, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 238–75.

Santi, E. A 2018, ‘Scientific Creativity Related To Rri - Psychological And Practical Implications For Students’, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (March), pp. 619–26.

Shaffril, H. A. M., Abu Samah, A. and D’Silva, J. L 2017 ‘Adapting towards climate change impacts: Strategies for small-scale fishermen in Malaysia’, Marine Policy, 81(December 2016), pp. 196–201.

Sierra-Correa, P.C., Cantera Kintz, J.R 2015. 'Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts', Mar. Policy vol. 51, pp. 385–93.

Siew, N. M. and Ambo, N 2010, ‘Development and evaluation of an integrated project- based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1017–33.

Son Mi Jo 2009, 'A Study of Korean Students’ Creativity in Science Using Structural Equation Modeling', PhD Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.

Sprecher, T. B 1975, ‘A Proposal for identifying Meaning of Creativity’, in Scientific Creativity: Recognition and Development. Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Company, New York.

Starko, A. J 2013, 'Creativity in the Classroom : Schools of Curious Delight', Taylor & Francis Ltd, London.

Syukri, M., Soewarno, S., Lilia, H., Lilia, E.M 2018, ‘The impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’ science problem-solving skills’, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 1, pp. 66-75

Torrance, E. P 1965 ‘Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth’, Daedalus, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 663–81.

Usta, E. and Akkanat, C 2015, ‘Investigating scientific creativity level of seventh grade students’, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 191, pp. 1408–15.

de Vries, H. B. and Lubart, T. I 2018 ‘Scientific creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture’, Journal of Creative Behavior, pp. 1–11.

Wang, K. and Nickerson, J. V 2017, ‘A literature review on individual creativity support systems’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 74, pp. 139-51.

Xue, Y., Gu, C., Wu, J., Dai, D.Y., Mu, X., Zhou, Z. 2018, ‘The Effects of Extrinsic Motivation on Scientific and Artistic Creativity among Middle School Students’, Journal of Creative Behavior, pp. 1–14.

Yang, K. K., Lin, S. F., Hong, Z., Lin, H. S. 2016, ‘Exploring the assessment of and relationship between elementary students’ scientific creativity and science inquiry’, Creativity Research Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–23.

Yu, J. 2010a, ‘The application of GA-based clustering analysis for the student scientific creativity’, Proceedings - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, AICI 2010, vol. 2, pp. 574–76.

Yu, J 2010b, ‘The application of neural networks and rough set in creativity measurement’, 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, CiSE 2010, pp. 1–3.

Zulkarnaen, Supardi, I. and Jatmiko, B 2017, ‘Feasibility of creative exploration, creative elaboration, creative modeling, practice scientific creativity, discussion, reflection (C3PDR) teaching model to improve students’ scientific creativity of junior high school’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1020–34.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Copyright © 2021 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. All rights reserved.