BUDGETARY SLACK ATAS INTERAKSI TEKANAN KETAATAN, REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY DAN MORAL EQUITY SUBORDINATE

Fara Fitriyani

Abstract


This study aims to determine the effect of obedience pressureon budgetary slack and the interaction between obedience pressure, moral equity,and reinforcement contingency on budgetary slack.

The population of this study is subordinate in universities in Banten Province. The sampling method using purposive sampling with the number of samples that meet the criteria of 91 respondents. The questionnaire was tested by reliability test and validity test, then the classical assumption was tested including normality test, multicollinearity test, and heteroscedasticity test. Then hypothesis testing is done by single regression analysis and multiple regression analysis

The results show that all variables are reliable and valid and meet the classical assumption test. The results of hypothesis analysis show that obedience pressureaffects budgetary slack, there is an interaction between obedience pressureand reinforcement contingency to budgetary slack, and no interaction between obedience pressureand moral equity to budgetary slack

 

Key Words: obedience pressure, reinforcement contingency, moral equity, budgetary slack


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, R. N. dan V. Govindarajan. 2007. Management Control System. McGraw-Hill Education: Irwin.

Blanchette, Danielle; Claude Pilote dan Jean Cadieux. 2002. Manager’s Moral Evaluation of Budgetary Slack Creation. www.accounting.rutgers.Edu/ raw/aaa/2002annual/cpe/cpe3/B-2.pdf

Brownell, Peter. 1982. The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 12–27.

Covaleski, M. J; Evans J. III; Luft dan M. Shields. 2003. Budgeting research: Three theoretical perspectives and criteria for elective integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15: 3–49.

Dawley, David D; et al.2009. Dimensionality Of Organizational Commitment In Volunteer Workers: Chamber Of Commerce Board Members And Role Fulfillment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 67 (2005) 511–525

Douglas, P. C. dan Wier, B. 2000. Integrating ethical dimensions into a model of budgetary slack creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 267–277

Dunk, A. 1993. The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. The Accounting Review, (April), 68(2), 400–410.

Fitriyani, Fara. 2013. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran dan Budget emphasis terhadap Budgetary Slack dengan Ekuitas Moral sebagai Variable Moderating. JRAT. Vol.6 No. 12 Tahun 2013

--------------------. 2016. Tekanan Ketaatan pada Penciptaan

Budgetary Slack. Tirtayasa Ekonomi. Vol 11 No.2 Tahun 2016

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro : Semarang

Hansen, D.R dan Mowen. M. 2000. Management Accounting. South Western College Publishing

Hartmann G.H Frank & Moers Frank. 1999. Testing contingency hypotheses in Budgetary Research : An Evaluation of the use of Moderated Regression Analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 24 page 291-315

Jermias. 2011. Budgetary Participation: The Effects of Information Asymmetry, Goal Commitment, and Role Ambiguity on Job Satisfaction and Performance. SSRN

Jones, T. M. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 15, 366–392

Kenis, Izzettin. 1979. Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitudes and Performance. The Accounting Review, 14 (4), hal. 707-721

Kren, L. 1993. Control system effects on budget slack. Advances in Management Accounting, 2, 109–118.

Lord dan DeZoort, 2001. The Effect of Obedience Pressure and Perceived Responsibility on Management Accountants’ Creation of Budgetary Slack. Behavioral Research in Accounting, Volume 18, 2006 pp. 19–35

Luft, J. L. 1997. Fairness, ethics and the effect of management accounting on transaction costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 199–216.

Lukka, K. 1988. Budgetary biasing in organizations: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. Accounting, Organization and Society, 13, 281–301.

Milani, K. 1975. The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 274–284.

Nouri H; Parker R.J. 1998. The Relationship Between Budget Participation and Job Performance: The Role of Budget Adequacy and Organizational Commitment. Accounting, organization and Society, Vol. 23, No 5/6, pp. 467-483

Purnamasari, Vena; Chrismastuti, Agnes Advensia.2006. Dampak Reinforcement Contingency terhadap Hubungan Sifat Machiavelian dan Perkembangan Moral. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9. Padang

Schiff, M., dan A.Y. Lewin. 1970. The impact of people on budgets. The Accounting Review (April): 259-268

Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Research Methods for Business. Salemba Empat

Stevens, Douglas E. 2002. The effects of reputation and ethics on budgetary slack. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14, 153–17

Taylor, Shelley E., Letitia Anne Peplau dan David O. Sears (2009). Social Psychology 12th Edition. Dialihbahasakan oleh Tri Wibowo B.S., Pearson Education-Prentice Hall.

Young, S. M. 1985. Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research, (Autumn), 23(2), 82.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35448/jte.v13i1.4246

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Tirtayasa Ekonomika

View My Stats