Pengaruh Pupuk Hayati dan Briket Amelioran terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi pada Tanah Salin

Mieke Rochimi Setiawati; Syifa Nabila Kurnia; Pirda Nurhopipah; Anas Ramdhani; Pujawati Suryatmana; Diyan Herdiyantoro; Tualar Simarmata; Betty Natalie Fitriatin

doi:10.33512/jur.agroekotetek.v15i1.19763

Pengaruh Pupuk Hayati dan Briket Amelioran terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi pada Tanah Salin

Mieke Rochimi Setiawati, Syifa Nabila Kurnia, Pirda Nurhopipah, Anas Ramdhani, Pujawati Suryatmana, Diyan Herdiyantoro, Tualar Simarmata, Betty Natalie Fitriatin

Abstract

Utilization of saline land as an effort to increase rice productivity is still constrained by the adverse effects of salinity stress. The solution to this effort can be done by utilizing PGPR biofertilizers and applying ameliorant briquettes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of using biofertilizers and ameliorant briquettes on saline soils with various levels of salinity on the growth of rice plants. This research was conducted at the Ciparanje Jatinangor screen house from September 2022 to January 2023. The research design used was a randomized block design with 12 treatments and 3 replications. The treatment applied was PGPR biofertilizer, ameliorant briquettes, and their combination on saline soil 4 and 8 dS m^-1 compared to control (non-saline soil). The results showed that PGPR biofertilizer increased the height of rice plants on saline soils 4 and 8 dS m^-1 7 DAP. At 14 DAP, PGPR biofertilizer, ameliorant briquettes, and their combinations did not increase rice plant height, root length and volume, wet weight, and dry weight of rice plants, although the application of biofertilizers, ameliorant briquettes, and their combinations tended to increase wet weight and dry weight of rice plant compared to soil with the same salinity without biofertilizers and ameliorant briquettes.

Keywords

Pupuk hayati PGPR, briket ameliorant, tanaman padi, tanah salin

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdel-Fattah, G.M., Shafei, A.M., & Gobara, A.A. (2021). Enhancing rice growth, yield, and salt tolerance using salt-tolerant bacteria and seaweed extract. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 23059-23070.

Adesemoye, A.O., & Kloepper, J.W. (2009). Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer‐use efficiency. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 85(1), 1-12.

Ahmad, M., Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., & Oves, M. (2019). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural practices with special reference to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant-microbe interactions in agro-ecological perspectives, 243-259.

Al-Rawahy, S.A., Aziz, H.A., Ahmad, M.A., & Aziz, S.Q. (2018). Growth enhancement and soil amelioration of salt-affected soil using ameliorant briquette. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 7(4), 341-351.

Ashraf, M. (2009). Biotechnological Approach of Improving Plant Salt Tolerance Using Antioxidants as Markers. Biotechnology Advances. 27(1): 8493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Luas Lahan Baku Sawah dan Produksi Padi Tahun 2021.

Dewi, A. K., & Setiawati, M.R. (2017). Pengaruh Pupuk Hayati Endofitik dengan Azolla pinnata terhadap Serapan N, N-Total Tanah, dan Bobot Kering Tanaman Padi (Oryza sativa L.) pada Tanah Salin. Agrologia, 6(2).

Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S., Behrendt, U., & Abd Allah, E.F. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants correlates with the proportion of antagonistic endophytes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 199.

Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wakeel, A., Siddique, K.H.M., & Ozturk, L. (2017). Salinity stress in rice: effects, mechanisms and management. Plant Stress Physiology, 2(1), e970.

FAO. (2005). Panduan Lapang FAO : 20 Hal Untuk Diketahui Tentang Dampak Air Laut Pada Lahan Pertanian di Propinsi NAD, www.fao.org/ag/20_things_on_salinity_bahas a. Pdfý

Galvan-Ampudia, C.S., Julkowska, M.M., Darwish, E., Gandullo, J., Korver, R.A., Brunoud, G., Haring, M.A., Munnik, T., Vernoux, T.C., Testerink. (2013). Halotropism is a Response of Plant Roots to Avoid a Saline Environment. Current Biology. 23(20): 20442050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013. 08.042

Haling, R.E., Brown, L.K., Bengough, A.G., & Young, I.M. (2013). Root hair length determines beneficial effect of a Glomus species on shoot growth of two pasture grasses under drought. Journal of experimental botany, 64(4), 337-345.

Hossain, M.A., Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., & Islam, M.T. (2018). Salt-induced changes in enzymatic activity and proline accumulation in germinating mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) seeds. Biologia Plantarum, 62(2), 334-342.

Junianti, E., Proklamasiningsih, E., & Purwanto, P. (2020). Efek Inokulasi PGPR terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi Fase Vegetatif di Media Salinitas Tinggi. Jurnal Agro, 7(2), 193-202.

Karolinoerita, V., & Yusuf, W.A. (2020). Salinisasi Lahan dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 14(2), 91-99.

Kristiono, A, Purwaningrahayu, RD, & Taufiq, A, 2013, Respons Tanaman Kedelai, Kacang Tanah, dan Kacang Hijau Terhadap Cekaman Salinitas, Buletin Palawija, no. 20, hal. 45 – 60.

Kumar, A., Singh, R., Singh, R., Kumar, M., & Kumar, V. (2018). Biochar-based soil amendment improves soil fertility and rice crop productivity in salt-affected coastal saline soils of eastern India. Paddy and Water Environment, 16(3), 447-458.

Kusmiyati, F., Sumarsono, S., & Karno, K. (2014). Pengaruh Perbaikan Tanah Salin terhadap Karakter Fisiologis Calopogonium mucunoides. Pastura : Jurnal IlmuTumbuhan Pakan Ternak, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24843/Pastura.2014.v04.i01.p01

Li, M., Yang, J., Chen, X., & Wu, S. (2014). Root morphology, physiology, and anatomy of rice plants under different phosphorus supplies. Annals of botany, 114(5), 895-904.

Mahajan, S., Pandey, P., Sharma, P., & Bhandari, P. (2017). Response of rice genotypes to salinity stress induced by sodium chloride. Plant Archives, 17(1), 721-726.

Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Second Edition. Academic Press Harcourt Brace & Company Publisher. New York.

Nasrudin, N., Isnaeni, S., & Hamdah, H. (2021). Respon Pertumbuhan Vegetatif Padi (Oryza sativa L.) Tercekam Salinitas Menggunakan Dua Jenis Amelioran Organik dengan Umur Bibit Berbeda. Agroteknika, 4(2), 75-85.

Nghia, N.K., Tien, T.T.M., Oanh, N.T.K. & Nuong, N.H.K. (2017). Isolation and Characterization of indole acetic acid producing halophilic bacteria from salt affected soil of rice–shrimp farming system in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 6(3), 69.

Parihar, P., Singh, S., Singh, R., Singh, V.P., & Prasad, S.M. (2015). Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(6), 4056-4075.

Purba, R. (2015). Kajian Pemanfaatan Pupuk Organik pada Usahatani Padi Sawah di Serang Banten (Study of Organic Fertilizer Utilization on Paddy Farming at Serang District, Banten). Agriekonomika, 4(1), 59-65.

Rad, H.E., Aref, F., Khaledian, M., Rezaei, M., Amiri, E., & Falakdehy, O.Y. (2011). The Effects of Salinity at Different Growth Stage on Rice Yield. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 17(3), 111-117.

Romadloni, A., & Wicaksono, K.P. (2018). Pengaruh Beberapa Level Salinitas Terhadap Perkecambahan Kacang Hijau (Vigna radiata L.) Varietas Vima 1, Jurnal Produksi Tanaman, vol. 6, no. 8, hal 1663 – 1670.

Shrivastava, P., & Kumar, R. (2015). Soil Salinity: a Serious Environmental Issue and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria as One of the Tools for its Alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 22 (2), 123e131.

Suhartini, T., & Harjosudarmo, P.Z. (2017). Toleransi Plasma Nuftah Padi Lokal terhadap salinitas. Bulletin Plasma Nuftah. Vol 23 (1) : 51-59.

Taufiq & Purwaningrahayu. (2013). ‘Tanggap Kacang Hijau Terhadap Salinitas’, Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, vol. 32, no. 3, hal. 159 – 170.

Wijewardana, C., Suriyagoda, L., Hettiarachchi, P., & Pathirana, S. (2017). Effect of salinity on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different water regimes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 19(2), 381-386.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33512/jur.agroekotetek.v15i1.19763