RESPON REGENERASI BEBERAPA GENOTIPE DAN STUDI TRANSFORMASI GENETIK TOMAT (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) MELALUI VEKTOR Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The development of an effective Agrobacterium transformation for tomato depends on several factors including plant genotype, explant vigor, Agrobacterium strain, selection system and culture conditions. It has been reported that tomato genotype contributed to success of transformation and regenerability in tissue culture. The purpose of this experiment was to study of regeneration response of four tomato genotypes and genetic transformation of tomato through Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. The experiment of tomato genotype regeneration study was conducted at Biotechnology Laboratory, Asian Vegetables Research and Development Center (AVRDC), Taiwan, meanwhile the experiment of tomato genetic transformation study was conducted at Molecular Biology Laboratory, Indonesian Center for Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Research and Development (ICABIOGRAD), Bogor. Three of well-adapted genotypes in Indonesia i.e. Intan, Gondol Hijau and CL6046 were used as regeneration response experimental materials. AVRDC’s genotype, CLN1559A, was used as a control genotype in in-vitro culture. The result of experiment showed that there was variation response on the ability of explant to regenerate and form the shoot among the four genotypes. The control genotype, CLN1559, was the most regenerable genotype that indicated by the highest number of regenerated explants and shoots per explants (90,56% and 0,66), followed respectively by Intan (66,22% and 0,37), CLN6046 (45,94% and 0,26) and Gondol Hijau (17,08% and 0,09). Based on the results, among of the well-adapted genotypes in Indonesia, Intan was the most responsive genotype to be regenerated compared with two other genotypes. Considerably, Intan could be used as an explant for study on genetic engineering tomato through A. tumefaciens vector. The results of genetic transformation study have successfully obtained several explants formed the callus dan shoot on medium selection containing 50 mg/l kanamycin. Nevertheless, transformaton efficiency in the experiment still low which of 55,7 explants in average generated 1,7 shoots (about of 3%) that survive on selection medium (50 mg/l kanamycin).
Keywords: Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., Regeneration, Genetic Transformation, Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Duriat, A.S. 1996. Management of pepper viruses in Indonesia: problem and progress. IARD J. 18(3): 45-50.
Green, S.K., and G. Kalloo. 1994. Leaf curl and yellowing viruses of pepper and tomato: An overview. Technical Bulletin Asian Vegetables Research and Development Center. Tainan, ROC. No. 21.
Gubis, J., Z. Laichova, J. Farago and S. Jurekova. 2003. Effect of genotype and explant type on shoot regeneration in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro. Czech J. Genet Plant Breed 39 (1) : 9-14.
Hamza, S., and Y. Chupeau. 1993. Re-evaluation of conditions for plant regeneration and Agrobacterum-mediated transformation from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). J. Exp Bot 44: 1837-184.
Jones, D.R. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur J. Plant Pathol. 109:195-219.
Ling, H-Q., D. Kriseleit, and M.G.Ganal. 1998. Effect of ticarcillin/potassium clavulanate on callus growth and shoot regeneration in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Plant Cell Rep 17: 843-847.
Moghaieb, R.E.A., H. Saneoka, and K. Fujita. 1999. Plant regeneration from hypocotyl and cotyledon explant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:639-646.
Moriones, E., and J. Navas Catillo. 2000. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, an emerging virus complex causing epidemics worldwide. Virus Res 71: 123-134.
Paz, M.M., H. Shou, Z. Guo, Z. Zhang, A.K. Banerjee, and K. Wang. 2004. Assesment of conditions affecting Agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation using the cotyledonary node explant. Euphytica 136: 167-179.
SAS Institute Inc., 1990. SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6. SAS Institute Inc.
Shahriari, F., H. Hashemi, and B. Hosseini. 2006. Factors influencing regeneration and genetic transformation of three elite cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Pakistan J. Biol Sci 9(15):2729-2733.
Sisharmini, A., A.D. Ambarwati, T.J. Santoso, M. Herman, dan G.A. Wattimena. 2005. Optimasi transformasi genetik Ubijalar melalui vektor Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Penelitian Pertanian 24(2):104-109.
Van Roekel, J.S.C., B. Damm, L.S. Melchers, and A. Hoekema. 1993. Factors influencing transfromation frequency of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell Rep 12: 644-647.
Veluthambi, K., A.K. Gupta, A. Sharma. 2003. The current status of plant transformation technologies. Cuurent Science 84(3): 368-380.
Weisburger, J.H. 1998. International symposium on lycopene and tomato products in disease prevention. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 218: 93-143.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33512/j.agrtek.v2i2.637
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Agroekoteknologi
INDEXED BY:
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.