Analysis of occupational health and safety at skin cracker factory using Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)

Santika Sari, Hashifah Husna, Laela Aziani Novitasari, Alfika Putri Kirana, Muhammad Sirozjudin Munir, Adinda Zahara Lailah Zain, Tariska Aaliyah Tsabitah

Abstract


The Mubarok Skin Cracker Factory is a home industry that produces skin crackers from cowhide, raw, and cooked crackers. Based on the interviews with factory owners, there have been several work accidents, and the production room has very minimal lighting and air ventilation. Based on these problems, the method used is the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), which aims to identify sources of hazards and potential work accidents in the production process to prevent work accidents. The risk matrix analysis shows as much as 24% of the risk is classified as extreme, 65% is classified as high risk, and 12% is classified as moderate risk. In addition, 17 sources of danger were found, namely knives, slippery floors, smoke, hot water, drying roofs, fire, smoke, hot water, ash flakes, hot tanks, wooden board, chopper, loads carried by workers, ovens, hot oil, hot frying pan, hanging boards, and cramped workplaces. The recommendations given by the researcher are to apply health and safety environment regulations and use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for employees while working, replace damaged equipment, and implement health promotion in factories.

Keywords


Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP); Risk matrix; health and safety environment

Full Text:

PDF (EN)

References


T. Tenkate et al., “WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and of the effect of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on cataract,” Environment International, vol. 125, pp. 542–553, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.001.

F. Pega, H. Hamzaoui, B. Náfrádi, and N. C. Momen, “Global, regional and national burden of disease attributable to 19 selected occupational risk factors for 183 countries, 2000–2016: A systematic analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 158–168, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4001.

F. Salguero-Caparrós, M. d. C. Pardo-Ferreira, M. Martı́nez-Rojas, and J. C. Rubio-Romero, “Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety. A literature review,” Safety Science, vol. 121, pp. 111–118, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.033.

J. Min, Y. Kim, S. Lee, T.-W. Jang, I. Kim, and J. Song, “The fourth industrial revolution and its impact on occupational health and safety, worker’s compensation and labor conditions,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 400–408, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.005.

A. Badri, B. Boudreau-Trudel, and A. S. Souissi, “Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern?,” Safety Science, vol. 109, pp. 403–411, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012.

H. De Cieri and M. Lazarova, “‘Your health and safety is of utmost importance to us’: A review of research on the occupational health and safety of international employees,” Human Resource Management Review, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 100790, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100790.

M. Zhang, R. Shi, and Z. Yang, “A critical review of vision-based occupational health and safety monitoring of construction site workers,” Safety Science, vol. 126, p. 104658, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104658.

J. Burgess, K. Dayaram, L. Lambey, and T. W. Afrianty, “The challenges of human resource development in Indonesia,” Developing the Workforce in an Emerging Economy, pp. 1–17, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780429273353-1.

I. Mindhayani, “Analisis risiko keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja dengan metode hazop dan pendekatan ergonomi (Studi kasus: UD. Barokah Bantul),” Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–38, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.24176/simet.v11i1.3544.

D. A. Anggraini, “Analisis resiko kecelakaan kerja CV.Mitra Kreasi Utama dengan menggunakan metode HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study),” Jurnal Surya Teknika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–20, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.37859/jst.v6i1.1859.

C. Anwar, W. Tambunan, and S. Gunawan, “Analisis kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3) dengan metode Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP),” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 61, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.33021/jmem.v4i2.825.

J. R. Taylor, “Automated HAZOP revisited,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 111, pp. 635–651, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.07.023.

J. I. Single, J. Schmidt, and J. Denecke, “State of research on the automation of HAZOP studies,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 62, p. 103952, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103952.

X. Feng, Y. Dai, X. Ji, L. Zhou, and Y. Dang, “Application of natural language processing in HAZOP reports,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 155, pp. 41–48, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.001.

M. Cheraghi, A. Eslami Baladeh, and N. Khakzad, “A fuzzy multi-attribute HAZOP technique (FMA-HAZOP): Application to gas wellhead facilities,” Safety Science, vol. 114, pp. 12–22, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.024.

J. Fuentes-Bargues, M. González-Cruz, C. González-Gaya, and M. Baixauli-Pérez, “Risk analysis of a fuel storage terminal using HAZOP and FTA,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 705, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070705.

J. Ahn and D. Chang, “Fuzzy-based HAZOP study for process industry,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 317, pp. 303–311, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.096.

P. K. Marhavilas, M. Filippidis, G. K. Koulinas, and D. E. Koulouriotis, “An expanded HAZOP-study with fuzzy-AHP (XPA-HAZOP technique): Application in a sour crude-oil processing plant,” Safety Science, vol. 124, p. 104590, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104590.

P. Baybutt, “A critique of the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 33, pp. 52–58, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.010.

M. R. Othman, R. Idris, M. H. Hassim, and W. H. W. Ibrahim, “Prioritizing HAZOP analysis using analytic hierarchy process (AHP),” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1345–1360, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10098-016-1104-4.

R. Mokhtarname, A. A. Safavi, L. Urbas, F. Salimi, M. M. Zerafat, and N. Harasi, “Application of multivariable process monitoring techniques to HAZOP studies of complex processes,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 74, p. 104674, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104674.

P. K. Marhavilas, M. Filippidis, G. K. Koulinas, and D. E. Koulouriotis, “The integration of HAZOP study with risk-matrix and the analytical-hierarchy process for identifying critical control-points and prioritizing risks in industry – A case study,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 62, p. 103981, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103981.

M. Giardina and M. Morale, “Safety study of an LNG regasification plant using an FMECA and HAZOP integrated methodology,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 35, pp. 35–45, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.03.013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/jiss.v8i2.15537

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


  is supported by