Value chain management strategy of sugar cane in Takalar sugar factory
Abstract
The primary and supporting activities of the Takalar Sugar Factory have been hindered by limited resources, resulting in low productivity. This research aims to determine strategies to enhance productivity effectively by adding value. It involves analyzing relationships among stakeholders using a Value Chain Analysis for internal activities and a PESTLE Analysis for external environmental factors. A TOWS Analysis is then formed, considering threats, opportunities, weaknesses, and strengths. This process helps develop a prioritized management strategy plan through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The sugarcane commodity chain comprises production flows, price information in the supply chain, and income streams involving four key actors: farmers, producers, traders, and end consumers. This analysis reveals suboptimal service activities and production technology. Moreover, low bidding prices contribute to uneven income distribution. Additionally, existing policies aimed at empowering sugarcane farmers result in low-value creation. Consequently, the proposed priority strategies for management revolve around enhancing efficiency in sugarcane production, leveraging modern cultivation techniques, employing Internet of Things technology, increasing sugarcane production capacity through on-farm restructuring, revitalizing off-farm factories for sugar production, and expanding market share by promoting new packaging products.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Directorate General of Estate Crops. 2021. Statistical of National Leading Estate Crops Commodity. Jakarta: Secretariate of Directorate General of Estate Crops.
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan. 2012. Budidaya Dan Pascapanen Tebu.
Indonesian Sugar Cane Statistics. 2021. Statistics Indonesia. Jakarta: Directorate of Food Crops, Horticulture, and Estate Crops
Statistics.
Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). Brighton: The University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
Porter, E. M. 1985. Competitive Advantage-Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Rastogi, N. & Trivedi, K. M. (2016). Pestle Technique—A Tool to Identify External Risks in Construction Projects, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET).
Ravanava, G. & Charantimath, P. (2012). Strategic formulation using TOWS matrix – a case study. International Journal of Research and Development.
Pearce II, John A. dan Robinson Richard B.Jr. 2008. Manajemen Strategis 10. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
David F. R. 2011. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Edition 13th Pearson Education
Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix: a tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning.
Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. 2006. Consistency In the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach. International Journal of Uncertainty.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process. USA: Universitas Pittsburgh.
Mubyarto. 2009. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Apeldoorn, Van. 1990. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Terjemahan Oetarid Sadino. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. 2020. Statistik Perkebunan Unggulan Nasional 2019-2021. https://ditjenbun.pertanian.go.id/template/uploads/2021/04/ [Diakses tanggal 08-11-2022].
Sinulingga, S., & Sitompul, D. (2014). Optimalisasi Rendemen Gula melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Produksi pada Pabrik Gula Sei Semayang Pt Perkebunan Nusantara II (Persero).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/jiss.v9i2.20018
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
is supported by