Indonesian Trias Politica Analysis: A Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XII/2023 concerning the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates

Fikri Gali Fernando, Yuda Nur Ardiyansyah, Tria Nindy Kurnia, Tiara Wahyu Meyda Wulandari, Maulana Adi Wangsa

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XII/2023 using an analytical tool, namely the concept in Trias Politica. This research uses a normative type (doctrinal) with a (Case approach). The data in this study used primary and secondary data, including national legislation and other relevant literature. Implementation of the Indonesian Trias Politica concept is different from the pure Montesquiue trias politica. This is because of the examinative power occupied by (BPK). The DPR is referred to as a positive legislator. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is referred to as a negative legislator. Thus, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XII/2023 which adds a phrase to Judicial Review in Article 169 letter q of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, normatively contradicts the authority of the DPR as a positive legislator listed in Article 20 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Based on Trias Politica's analysis, Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XII/2023 concerning Decisions 29/PUU-XXI/2023, 51/PUU-XXI/2023, and 55/PUU-XXI/2023, the Court thinks that regarding the age in article 169 letter (q) of Law No. 7 of 2017, it is the authority to form laws and to amend them. This is certainly contrary to the principle of open legal policy where this principle is oriented toward the DPR as a positive legislature or as a framer of laws and to change it. This is certainly contrary to the principle of open legal policy where this principle is oriented towards the DPR as a positive legislature or as a framer of laws contained in Article 20 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 173 letter (b) of the MD3 Law which states that the authority and duties of the DPR are carried out by discussing, drafting, and disseminating bills.

Keywords


Trias Politica; DPR; Constitutional Court; Constitutional Court Decision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi Arifin. “Peran Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Indonesia.” IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i1.2.

Andiraharja, Diyar Ginanjar. “Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Fungsi Ajudikasi Konstitusional Di Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 3, no. 2 (2021): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i2.9012.

Azzahra, Farida. “Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Presiden Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Sebagai Upaya Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Indonesia.” Legislasi Indonesia, 18, 153-67., no. 18 (2021): 153–67.

Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Perbandingan Fungsi Dan Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Lembaga Sejenisnya Di Tiga Negara (Indonesia, Austria Dan Perancis).” Al-Qisth Law Review 1, no. 1 (2017): 28.

Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan. “Pencegahan Korupsi Legislasi Melalui Penguatan Partisipasi Publik Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 3 (2020): 282. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.679.

Hambali, Azwad Rachmat. “Kemerdekaan Hakim Dan Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakima Dalam Konsep Negara Hukum.” Kalabbirang Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2021): 48–57.

Intan, Apriwinda. “Politik Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” An-Nizam 14, no. 2 (2020): 141–53. http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/annizam/article/view/319.

Kodiyat MS, Benito Asdhie, and Eza Ista Maulida Sinaga. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Konstitusional Complaint.” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 160–74. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v4i2.3174.

Kusnardi, Moh. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Bakti, 1983.

M. Alpi Syahrin, Jufri Hardianto. M. Kastulani. “Upaya Menemukan Konsep Ideal Tentang Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Eksekusi I, no. 2 (2019): 104–32.

Muahimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Nusa Tenggara Barat: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Pub. L. No. 12, 1 (2011).

Putri, Adeline Dyah Kasetyaning, and Yohanes Suwanto. “Kewenangan Dan Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia.” Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional 1, no. 4 (2022): 599–606.

https://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/view/83.

Rajab, Achmadudin. “Peran Penting Badan Keahlian Dpr Ri Dalam Sistem Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Mendukung Terwujudnya Keadilan Untuk Kedamaian.” Journal Legislasi Indonesiaurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 02 (2017): 233–44.

Rangga Wijaya. “Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 23–27. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i1.5.

Rohmah, Elva Imeldatur. “Dinamika Overlapping Kewenangan Dpr Dan Presiden Dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Negara.” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 1 (2023): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.56943/dekrit.v13n1.137.

Ruhenda, Ruhenda, Heldi Heldi, Hasan Mustapa, and Muhammad Andi Septiadi. “Tinjauan Trias Politika Terhadap Terbentuknya Sistem Politik Dan Pemerintahan Di Indonesia.” Journal of Governance and Social Policy 1, no. 2 (2020): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v1i2.18221.

Santio, Erik, and Bahder Johan Nasution. “Analisis Kewenangan Presiden Republik Indonesia Di Bidang Legislatif Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.” Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 1, no. 1 SE- (2021): 152–69. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Limbago/article/view/8643.

Sugiman. “Fungsi Legislasi Dpr Pasca Amandemen Uud Nkri 1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 173–82. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.468.

Sugiono Margi, and Maulida Khazanah. “Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Kelembagaan Negara.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 1, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i3.48.

Sunarto, Sunarto. “Fungsi Legislasi Dpr Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945.” Integralistik 28, no. 1 (2017): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v28i1.11814.

Suparman, Odang. “Konsep Lembaga Negara Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Trias Politica Berdasarkan Prinsip Checks and Balances System.” Ahkam 2, no. 1 (2023): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i1.898.

Syaputra, Deni. “Kewenangan Presiden, DPR Dan DPD Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Menara Ilmu XII, no. 4 (2018): 29–38. http://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/viewFile/731/650.

Tinambunan, Hezron Sabar Rotua, and Dicky Eko Prasetio. “Rekonstruksi Konstitusi Dalam Regional Representative Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Terhadap Fungsi Legislatif.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 48, no. 3 (2019): 266. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.48.3.2019.266-274.

Triyudiana, Andra, Ahmad Solehudin, Azhary Fathama, and Nabilla Putri Aryani. “Netralitas Profesi Hakim Di Tengah Intervensi Politik.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 1, no. 01 (2022): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.11111/moderasi.xxxxxxx.

Umboh, Cristiani Junita. “Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia.” Lex Administratum 8, no. 1 (2020): 131–42.

UUD Negara RI Tahun 1945.

Yani, Ahmad. “Analisis Kontruksi Struktural Dan Kewenangan DPR Dalam Fungsi Legislasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 2 (2018): 348. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1526.

Yarni, Yuni. “Peran Dan Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Wali Konstitusi Dan Interpretasi Konstitusional.” Meraja Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 44–47. https://www.merajajournal.com/index.php/mrj/article/download/2/2%0AGoogle Scholar.

Yulistyowati, Efi, Endah Pujiastuti, and Tri Mulyani. “Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia: Studi Komparatif Atas Undang – Undang Dasar Tahun 1945.” Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 18, no. 2 (2017): 328–38.

Zuhri, Basrial. “Peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI Tahun 1945 Setelah Amandemen.” Ensiklopedia of Journal PERANAN 3, no. 5 (2021): 73–83.

Zulaiha, Maharani Trisni. “Public Policy Analysis Of The Implementation Of Constitutional Court Ruling Number 90 / PUU-XXI / 2023 In The 2024 Election.” Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 1, no. 4 (2023): 89–103.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v4i1.24585

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum

EDITORIAL ADDRESS

Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Raya Palka KM. 03 Sindangsari Pabuaran Kab. Serang
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence
E-mail  : [email protected] 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.