NILAI-NILAI PENDIDIKAN DALAM NOVELET LUKISAN KARYA GOLA GONG (KAJIAN STRUKTURALISME DINAMIK)
Abstract
The purposes of this research are: (1) to reveal value of independent in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong; (2) to reveal value of creativity in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong; (3) to reveal of friendship in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong; (4) to reveal value of social attention in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong; (5) to reveal value of responsibility in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong. The researcher used qualitative method with Analisys Content. To reveal values of education in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong, the researcher used dynamic structuralism study that can define the relation between literature-author-reality of life. The result of this research shows that there is values of education in novellete Lukisan by Gola Gong. Value of Autonomy is described by figure of Tomo who is independent in funding his life and his sister’s education, Rini. Value of creativity is described by figure of Tomo who is creative in making art especially painting. Value of friendship is descibed by the relation of Tomo, Fishermans, and Febri. Tomo is always happy when talking to fishermans, and when Tomo gives advice to Febri about Febri’s Parents who is very protective. Value of social attention is described by Tomo and Fishermans when they help Febri when he is unconscious near Carita Beach. Value of responsibility is more dominant in this novellete, because some figures show their responsibility in their bihaviour. Figure of father and mother of Febri who have responsibility about Febri’s growth. Figure of Mr udin who has responsibility to his job. Figure of Tomo has responsibility to finish his painting for Febri. Figure of Tomo’s parents who have responsibility to their children education, Tomo and Rini, even though their life is not easy. Nowadays, The reality of restriction in relationship between two people who love each other always happen. It is natural for the parents who expect the best for their children’s future. Writer concludes that novellete Lukisan can be teaching material in Senior high school.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adisusilo, Sutarjo. 2012. Pembelajaran Nilai – Karakter Konstruktivisme dan VCT sebagai Inovasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Afektif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Ahmadi, Abu. 2001. Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta.
Ahmadi, Abu dan Nur Uhbiyati. 2007. Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Alifah, Ica. Fiksi (Pengertian Novel, Cerpen dan Novelet). http://akhowatberhatibaja.blogspot.com/2011/03/f-i-k-s-i-pengertian-novel-cerpen-dan.html. diakses pada jumat, 4 Maret 2011.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. 2011. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Pelajar. Jakarta: BPPB.
Bitstream.Pengertian Novel. http://repository.usu.ac.id. Diakses pada Jumat tanggal 11 maret 2011.
Depdiknas, 2004. Ensiklopedi Sastra Indonesia. Bandung: Titian Ilmu.
Depdiknas. 2003. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Rieneka Cipta.
Endraswara, Suwardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.
Fananie, Zainuddin. 2000. Telaah Sastra. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Gong, Gola. 1997. Lukisan . Jakarta: Venus Khasanah.
Hasanudin, W.S. Drama Karya dalam Dua Dimensi: Kajian Teori, Sejarah, dan Analisis. Bandung: Angkasa.
Hidayati, Nur Alfin. 2012. Analisis Psikologi Sastra dan Nilai-nilai Pendidikan dalam Novel Hafalan Shalat Delisa Karya Tele Liye. Surakarta: Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
K. Kaswadi (ed.), Pendidikan Nilai Memasuki Tahun 2000, (Jakarta: Grasindo, 1993), hlm. 148-175.
Masrun, Moh. 2000. Senangnya Belajar Agama Islam 4. Yogyakarta: Erlangga
Marahaimin, Ismail. 1999. Menulis Secara Populer. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Mayring, Philip. 2004. Analisis isi Kualitatif http://unituebingen.de/qualitative-psychologie/t-wsdi/Mayring_en.htm diakses pada tanggal 23 Maret 2011
Moleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Naim, Ngainun. 2012. Character Building. Jakarta: Ar-ruz Media .
Nasution, S. 2003. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito
Nurgiantoro, Burhan. 2007. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada.
Poewadarminta. 2002. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Pusat Kurikulum Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Bahan Pelatihan Penguatan Metodologi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Nilai-nilai Budaya untuk Membentuk Daya Saing dan Karakter Bangsa 2010.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2010. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
__________________. 2012. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra (dari Strukturalisme hingga Postrukturalisme, Persepsi Wacana Naratif). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Rendra, W.S. 2007. Seni Drama untuk Remaja. Jakarta: Burung Merak Press.
Rose, Colin dkk. 2007. Super Accelerated Learning (Revolusi Belajar Cepat Abad 21 Berdasarkan Riset Terbaru para Ilmuwan). Jabal.
Saputra, Prayoga Dwi. Pengertian Tanggung Jawab. http://prayogoanakpantai.blogspot.com/2012/05/pengertian-tanggung-jawab. html. Diakses pada tanggal 10 Mei 2012
Sauri, Sofyan, dan Herlan Firmansyah. 2010. Meretas Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung: Arfino Raya
Sayuti, Surnito, A. 1994. “Strukturalisme Dinamik dalam Pengkajian Sastra dalam Jabrohim (Ed.) Teori Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Masyarakat Poetika Indonesia dan IKIP Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Semi, Atar. 2012. Metodologi penelitian sastra. Bandung: Angkasa
Shchiller, Pam dan Tamera Bryant. 2002. 16 Moral Dasar Bagi Anak (di Indonesiakan Susi Sensusi). Jakarta: PT Alexedia Komputiondo Kelompok Gramedia.
Stanton, Robert. 2007. Teori Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Subagio, Adi. Artikel Sehat. http://adivancha.blogspot.com/2012/05/nilai-pendidikan-sastra.html (Diakses pada hari rabu tanggal 23 Mei 2012).
Sudjiman, Panuti dan Art Van Zoest. 1992. Serba-Serbi Semotik. Jakarta:
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jmbsi.v1i1.1659
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Membaca (Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia)