Application of Augmented Reality (AR) In Vocational Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Siddiq Darmawan, Mumu Komaro

Abstract


In education, Augmented Reality has been widely used to complement the standard curriculum. This article aims to examine how the application, and impact of the use of AR in Vocational Education. The Systematic Literature Review method is used to identify, study, evaluate, and interpret Augmented Reality in vocational education. Research data were identified by help of the PRISMA 2020 form. Article was collected from Science Direct database. There were 454 articles. After being selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data used were 14 articles. The results of the study reveal that AR is applied in learning as an innovative learning medium, a new approach to learning to improve students' understanding of knowledge, and skills and provide a concrete learning experience. The integration of AR in education has the impact of increasing students' understanding and learning experience, promoting positive attitudes, making the learning process fun and interesting and learning efficiency.


Keywords


Augmented Reality, Teaching, Learning, Vocational Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


H. Pranoto and F. M. Panggabean, “Increase The Interest In Learning By Implementing Augmented Reality: Case studies studying rail transportation.,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 157, pp. 506–513, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.007.

P. Hartanto and J. Suprapmanto, Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Humanities, Social Science (ICEHoS 2022), vol. 763. Springer Nature, 2023.

H.-K. Wu, S. W.-Y. Lee, H.-Y. Chang, and J.-C. Liang, “Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education,” Comput. & Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41–49, 2013.

F. J. Sandoval-Henr’iquez and M. G. Badilla-Quintana, “Measuring stimulation and cognitive reactions in middle schoolers after using immersive technology: Design and validation of the TINMER questionnaire,” Comput. & Educ., vol. 166, p. 104157, 2021.

V. M. Herbert et al., “Developing a Smartphone App With Augmented Reality to Support Virtual Learning of Nursing Students on Heart Failure,” Clin. Simul. Nurs., vol. 54, pp. 77–85, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.02.003.

J. M. Krüger, K. Palzer, and D. Bodemer, “Learning with augmented reality: Impact of dimensionality and spatial abilities,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 3, p. 100065, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100065.

M. B. Ibáñez and C. Delgado-Kloos, “Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ., vol. 123, pp. 109–123, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002.

M. Belani and A. Parnami, “Augmented Reality for Vocational Education Training in K12 Classrooms,” in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), 2020, pp. 317–320, doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct51615.2020.00090.

J. Hong, “How can a design-based research methodology that utilises Mixed-Reality (MR) Technologies be utilized to effectively enhance learning for authentic, high-risk situations?,” Pacific J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.24135/pjtel.v2i1.25.

P. J. K. Reddy, “New horizons for learning: Augmented reality in education,” in Innovating with Augmented Reality: Applications in Education and Industry, 2021.

R. Agrawal and J. Pillai, “Augmented Reality Application in Vocational Education: A Case of Welding Training,” pp. 23–27, Nov. 2020.

A. Aprinaldi, Y. Rahmawati, and M. Komaro, “Implementation of Augmented Reality (AR) android based in learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1402, no. 7, p. 77045, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1402/7/077045.

S. Keele and others, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.” Technical report, ver. 2.3 ebse technical report. ebse, 2007.

Y. Zhao, A. M. Pinto Llorente, and M. C. Sánchez Gómez, “Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Educ., vol. 168, no. August 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

A. Iftene and D. Trandabăț, “Enhancing the Attractiveness of Learning through Augmented Reality,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 126, pp. 166–175, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.220.

D. Mourtzis, V. Siatras, J. Angelopoulos, and N. Panopoulos, “An Augmented Reality Collaborative Product Design Cloud-Based Platform in the Context of Learning Factory,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 45, pp. 546–551, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.076.

B. Sharma and A. Mantri, “Assimilating Disruptive Technology: A New Approach of Learning Science in Engineering Education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 915–921, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.132.

S. Solmaz, J. L. Dominguez Alfaro, P. Santos, P. Van Puyvelde, and T. Van Gerven, “A practical development of engineering simulation-assisted educational AR environments,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 35, pp. 81–93, 2021.

J. Yip, S.-H. Wong, K.-L. Yick, K. Chan, and K.-H. Wong, “Improving quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 88–101, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.014.

D. Mourtzis, V. Zogopoulos, and E. Vlachou, “Augmented Reality supported Product Design towards Industry 4.0: a Teaching Factory paradigm,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 23, pp. 207–212, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.018.

D. Scaravetti and D. Doroszewski, “Augmented Reality experiment in higher education, for complex system appropriation in mechanical design,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 84, pp. 197–202, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.284.

S. R. Sorko and M. Brunnhofer, “Potentials of Augmented Reality in Training,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 31, pp. 85–90, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.014.

G. Y.-M. Kao and C.-A. Ruan, “Designing and evaluating a high interactive augmented reality system for programming learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 132, p. 107245, 2022.

S.-C. Chang and G.-J. Hwang, “Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions,” Comput. Educ., vol. 125, pp. 226–239, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007.

Q. Conley, R. K. Atkinson, F. Nguyen, and B. C. Nelson, “MantarayAR: Leveraging augmented reality to teach probability and sampling,” Comput. Educ., vol. 153, p. 103895, 2020.

G. Kostov and J. Wolfartsberger, “Designing a Framework for Collaborative Mixed Reality Training,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 200, pp. 896–903, 2022.

X. Wei, D. Weng, Y. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course,” Comput. & Educ., vol. 81, pp. 221–234, 2015.

A. S. Rai, A. S. Rai, E. Mavrikakis, and W. C. Lam, “Teaching binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy to novice residents using an augmented reality simulator,” Can. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 430–434, 2017.

H.-Y. Chang, Y.-S. Hsu, H.-K. Wu, and C.-C. Tsai, “Students’ development of socio-scientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1410–1431, 2018.

P. Sommerauer and O. Müller, “Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition,” Comput. & Educ., vol. 79, pp. 59–68, 2014.

T.-C. Hsu, “Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter?,” Comput. & Educ., vol. 106, pp. 137–149, 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/vanos.v8i2.20841

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.