Comprehending the Epistemic Examination of the Final and Binding Principles in Indonesia's Constitutional Court

Artha Debora Silalahi

Abstract


This paper critiques the dominant intercultural discourse of universally understandable and testable knowledge, focusing on the role of intersubjectivity in modern science. It argues that the validation of knowledge and the condemnation of inappropriate practices, particularly in legal contexts, are crucial in contemporary society. The study emphasizes that constitutional decisions are shaped not only by legal provisions but also by the search for values tied to truth. It explores how constitutional justice hinges on a judge’s ability to discover truth and value free from external influences. The paper also highlights the importance of legal knowledge following established rules, stressing that while judges apply legal principles and juries determine facts, legal rules must be continually critiqued to ensure just and reasonable adjudication. The research contributes to understanding the intersection of law, truth, and objectivity in the evolving landscape of constitutional decision-making.

Keywords


Final and Binding; Constitutional Court, Epistemic Examinantion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agassi, Joseph. 2014. Popper and His Popular Critics: Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, and Imre Lakatos. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Agazzi, Evandro. 2014. Scientific Objectivity and Its Context. Mexico City: Springer International Publishing.

Balashov, Yuri and Alex Rosenberg. 2002. Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Reading. London: Routledge.

Bedner, Adriaan and Jacqueline Vel. 2021. “Legal Education in Indonesia.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Vol. 1 No.1 (September 2021): 1-30.

Bloom, Harold C. 1971. “Objectivity in Social Research.” American Journal of Sociology Vol.76 No.5 (March 1971).

Bogucki, Olgierd. 2023. “Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding and Legal Interpretation.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law- Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:649–666

Braaten, Jane. 1991. Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society. New York: State University of New York Press.

Braden, George D. “The Search for Objectivity in Constitutional Law.” The Yale Law Journal Vol.57 No.4 (February 1948).

Bustamante, Thomas, and Bernardo Goncalves Fernandes. 2016. Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism. Brazil: Springer International Publishing.

Chang, Jonathan, and Meghna Chakrabarti. 2021. “In the Constitution of Knowledge, Scholar Jonathan Rauch’s Defense of Truth.”

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/06/24/jonathan-rauch-in-defense-of-truth.

Christie, George C. “Objectivity in the Law.” The Yale Law Journal Vol.78 No.8 (July 1969).

Deleuze, Gilles and Felix. 1991. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.

Fiss, Owen M. “Objectivity and Interpretation.” Stanford Law Review Vol.34 No.4 (April 1982).

Garvey, John H. and T. Alexander Aleinikoff. 1989. Modern Constitutional Theory A Reader. ST.Paul Minn: West Publishing Co.

Giannini, Giacomo and Tom Schoonen. 2023. “Relational Troubles Structuralist Worries for An Epistemology of Powers-Based Modality.” The Philosophical Quarterly Vol.73 No.4.

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gray, Christopher Berry. 1999. The Philosophy of Law An Encyclopedia Vol.I-II A-Z. New York, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Golding, Martin P. and William A. Edmundson. 2005. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to A Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hartman, Robert. 1967. The Structure of Value: Foundations of Scientific Axiology. London and Amsterdam: Southern Illinois University Press.

Jones, W.T. 1969. Hobbes to Hume: A History of Western Philosophy Second Edition. London, Sydney, Tokyo, and Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Kant, Immanuel. 1787. Critique of Pure Reason. London, and New York: J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd.

Khelfa, Nouha and Sayed Mustafa Zamani. 2023. “Is Political Science a Science.?” Jurnal Politik Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics) Vol.9 No.2: 103-117.

Klatt, Matthias. 2012. “Epistemic Discretion in Constitutional Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law Vol.10 Issue 1 (January 2012): 69-105.

Macedo Jr., Ronaldo Porto. 2016.” On How Law is Not Like Chess-Dworkin and the Theory of Conceptual Types.” Democratizing Constitutional Law and Philosophy Library 113.

Manan, Bagir dan Susi Dwi Harijanti. 2015. Memahami Konstitusi: Makna dan Aktualisasi. RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok.

Marris, C.W., and F.C.L.M. Jacobs. 2011. Law, Order, and Freedom: A Historical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London and New York: Springer International Publishing.

Misak, Cheryl. 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1969. Objectivity in Social Research. New York: Pantheon Book.

Myrdal, Gunnar. “The Unity of the Social Sciences.” Human Organization Vol.34 No.4 (Winter 1975).

Raz, J. 1970. The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal Systems. Oxford: Clarendon.

Reidy, David A. 2007. On the Philosophy of Law. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Rosati, Connie S. “Some Puzzles about the Objectivity of Law.” Law and Philosophy Vol.23 No.3 (May 2004).

Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. s.n: s.l, 1912.

Samuel, Geoffrey. 2016. Epistemology and Method in Law. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Tebbit, Mark. 2005. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.

Tucker, C. Jack. “Value Judgment and Social Science: Structures and Processes.” American Sociological Review Vol.36 No. 1 (February 1971).

Wacks, Raymond. 2012. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, Shaun P. 2009. Reflections on Rawls: An Assessment of His Legacy. US: Ashgate Publishing Limited.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v4i4.28626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir

EDITORIAL ADDRESS
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten       
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk
E-mail  : [email protected] 

 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Yustisia Tirtayasa is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.