Development of Multiple Representation-Based General Chemistry Textbook Using Guided Inquiry

Ifah Silfianah

Abstract


This study aims to describe the development process and determine the feasibility of multiple representation-based textbooks that are designed with a guided inquiry model. The method used in this research is the Research & Development (R&D) with the ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implementation, Evaluate) model. Analyze stages are carried out in the form of curriculum analysis, concepts, and learning resources. In the design process, textbooks are made following the guided inquiry learning stages and design the media in the form of images that show multiple representations so that an initial draft is produced. At the Develop stage, draft books are printed and reproduced for validation and revision. The next step of implementation is carried out through a small-scale trial to determine the initial response to the textbook. In the final stage (Evaluation), the textbook on the results of the small-scale trial was revised to be used in the medium-scale trial to get the textbook's final response data. This study involved ten students in the chemical Tadris department in the small group and 29 students in the moderate group. The instrument used was the validation sheet and the language response sheet and the presentation of the textbook.  Data of expert validation and trial results were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively in the form of percentages using a Likert scale. The results showed the feasibility of the content, linguistic, presentation, and graphic textbooks, respectively 95.33%, 94.76%, 92.16%, and 92.58%. The suitability of the textbooks with the guided inquiry syntax and multiple presentations was 98.33% each. A small group trial shows that the language aspect gets 84.33 scores, and the presentation aspect is 84.75. After the textbook was revised, the trial results for the medium group showed that the linguistic aspect value was 90.34, and the presentation aspect was 92.59. Overall it can be concluded that the textbooks developed are very suitable for use in learning.

Keywords


textbook; general chemistry; guided inquiry; multiple representations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriansi, E., & Nasrudin, H. (2014). Development Of Students Worksheet Based Refresentation Of Sub-Microscopic Level In Colloid 11th Grade. Journal of Chemical Education, 3(3), 66–74.

Andromeda, Iryani, Mawardi, & Irham, S. M. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Hidrolisis Garam Berbasis Guided-Inquiry Dengan Representasi Chemistry-Triangle Untuk Siswa Sma/Ma. Prosiding Semirata, 612–623.

Astuti, R. T., & Olensia, Y. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Kimia Analitik Berbasis Inkuiri pada Materi Titrasi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 4(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i2.5326

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. In Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies. New York : Springer.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412958806.n258

BSNP. (2014). Instrumen Penilaian Buku Tahun 2014. http://bsnp-indonesia.org/id/?p=1340

Coffman, M., & Riggs, L. (2006). The Virtual Vee Map: A Template for Internet Inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(1), 32–39. www.jstor.org/stable/42993896

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. . (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (Eight). Pearson.

Fajardo Teresa M., M., & Bacarrisas, P. G. (2017). First-Year College Students’ Knowledge in Chemistry: Is It Adequate? American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1039–1043. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-10-5

Furqan, H., Yusrizal, Y., & Saminan, S. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Praktikum Berbasis Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Di Sma Negeri 1 Bukit Bener Meriah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 4(2), 124–129.

Irfandi, Linda, R., & Erviyenni. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Learning Cycle – 5E pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i2.3348

Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry : learning in the 21st century school. In School Libraries Worldwide (Vol. 16, Issue 1). Libraries Unlimited.

Langitasari, I. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Multi Level Representasi Mahasiswa Tingkat I Pada. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 1(1), 14–24.

Madden, S. P., Jones, L. L., & Rahm, J. (2011). The role of multiple representations in the understanding of ideal gas problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90035H

Mayasari, E., Enawaty, E., & Erlina. (2012). Pengaruh Penggunaan Buku Ajar Ikatan Ionik dengan Pendekatan Muktirepresentasi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 66, 37–39.

Novianty, I., Sulistina, O., & Zakia, N. (2013). Efektivitas Penerapan Modul Materi Analisis Elektrokimia Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Persepsi Siswa Kelas XI Semester 1 Kompetensi Keahlian Analisis Kimia SMKN 7 Malang. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Prastowo, A. (2013). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jogjakarta : Diva Press.

Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Metode Pendekatan Kualitiatif, Kuantitatif, dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Thomas, G. P. (2017). “Triangulation:” an expression for stimulating metacognitive reflection regarding the use of “triplet” representations for chemistry learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00227g

Wahyuningsih, F., Saputro, S., & Mulyani, S. (2014). Pengembangan Lks Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Materi Pokok Hidrolis Garam Untuk. Jurnal Paedagogia, 17(1), 94–103.

Walker, L., & Warfa, A. R. M. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL®) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS ONE, 12(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186203

Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 109–130.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v5i2.7508

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Ifah Silfianah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EduChemia Indexed by:

   

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 More Indecxing...                                                         

Creative Commons License

EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

________________________________________________________

EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan ISSN 2502-4779 (print) | ISSN 2502-4787 (online)
Published by Department of Chemistry Education - Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Address : Jl. Ciwaru Raya No. 25, Sempu, Kota Serang, Banten 42117, Indonesia
Email  : [email protected]