The Effect of the Game Method on Students' Motivation and Cognitive Ability

Ruth May, Dian Rachmawati, Evi Amelia

Abstract


This study aimed to the effect ofthe game method on motivation and cognitive capacities. The study employed a quasi-experimental approach with a randomized block design, with the game method as the independent variable and motivation and cognitive ability as the dependent variables. The research sample consisted of VIII C as the control class and VIII A as the experimental class. The sampling approach used was random sampling. A questionnaire was used to assess student motivation. A questionnaire was used to assess student motivation, a posttest was used to assess cognitive capacities, and an observation sheet was used to assess learning implementation. According to the findings, the average score of students' motivation in the experimental class was 61, placing them in the very high group. Students in the experimental class have a strong cognitive ability, scoring 72.36. The P value for the t-test was 0,05, showing that the gaming method influenced students' motivation and cognitive ability on human movement system concepts.


Keywords


Game method, Motivation, Cognitive, Human Movement System Concepts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Asfandiyar, A. Y. (2009). Kenapa Guru Harus Kreatif? Mizan, Bandung.

Dankbaar, M.E.W., Alsma, J., Jansen, E.E.H. et al. (2016). An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students’ clinical cognitive skills and motivation. Adv in Health Sci Educ. Vol. 21, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9641-x.

Asmani, J.M. (2009). Tips Menjadi Guru Inspiratif, Kreatif, Dan Inovatif. Jogjakarta, DIVA Press.

Djamarah, S.B. & A. Zain. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Goh, T. L., T. Brusseau, J. Hannon. (2018). On-task behavior of elementary students during movement integration. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). Vol. 18 (1): 1-4.

Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 36 (15): 2534-2553.

Huang, W. H., Huang, W. Y., & Tschopp, J. (2010). Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Computers & Education, 55 (2). 789-797.

Nikou, S. A., Anastasios, A. E. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and achievement. Journal Computer and Phscycology. 1 (1): 90-99.

Padmono, Y. (2011). Manajemen Pembelajaran di Kelas. In: Saefudin et al. (ed.). (2012). Penerapan Metode Permainan Menggunakan Kartu Kosakata Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Siswa Kelas V SD. Didaktik PGSD Kebumen. 1(2).

Parinussa, J., Taryana, T., Ningtyas, A., Rachman, R., & Tannady, H. (2023). Developing Student Emotional Intelligence by Involving the Active Role of Teacher. Journal on Education, 5(3), 8528-8533. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1638.

Prayitno, Elida. (1989). Motivasi Dalam Belajar. PPLPTK Depdikbud, Jakarta.

Purwanto, M.N. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Qvortrup, A. M. Wiberg, G. Christensen, M. Hansbol. (2016). On the Definition of Learning. University Press of Southern Denmark.

Rahardjo, A., Pertiwi, S. (2020). Learning motivation and studens’ achievement in learning English: A case study at secondary school students in the Covid-19 pandemic situation. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature. Vol. 1 (2): 56-44.

Sanjaya, W. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Sardiman, A.M. (1996). Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar Pedoman Bagi Guru dan Calon Guru. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Setiyowati E. P., Y. A. Arifianto. (2020). Hubungan kompetensi pedagogic guru dan prestasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Vol. 1 (2): 78-95.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar Dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Stiller, K. D., S. Schworm. (2019). Game-based learning of the structure and functioning of body cells in a foreign language: Effects on motivation, cognitive load, and performance. Front. Educ. Vol. 4 (18): 1-19.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Suryosubroto, B. (2002). Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Sekolah. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.

Sutrisno, E. (2011). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran “Permainan” Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Kedung Waringin 3 Bogor. Thesis, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.

Syaifuddin. (2006). Anatomi Fisiologi Untuk Mahasiswa Keperawatan. Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC, Jakarta.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM). Vol. 5 (3): 28-36.

Tedjasaputra, M.S. (2001). Bermain, Mainan, Dan Permainan. Penerbit PT Grasindo, Jakarta

Wasyik, T., A. Muhid. (2020). The urgency of classical learning motivation in the millennial era: Al Zarnuji’s Perpective. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Vol. 3 (3). 324-341.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v4i1.20583

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.