Analysis of student’s creative thinking ability in computation physics course

Rizka Melia Putri, Akmam Akmam, Fatni Mufit, Silvi Yulia Sari, Rahmat Hidayat

Abstract


Creative thinking is a crucial thing to support the development of students taking Computational Physics courses but is rarely considered, so it takes a description of students' creative thinking skills so as to provide alternative appropriate learning methods. The purpose is to determine the ability of creative thinking of college students within the Computational Physics courses. This kind of study is descriptive with a quantitative method. The studies populace is all college students taking courses of Computational Physics for the January-June 2021 semester. The studies tool is within the form of a questionnaire. The research results: Students' Creative Thinking Ability in Computational Physics Course as a whole is 65%, based on the Problem Sensitivity indicator has a direct effect value of 0.91, the Fluency indicator is 0.94, the Flexibility indicator is 0.96, the Originality indicator is 0.64, the Elaboration indicator is 0.69, and the Evaluation indicator 0.58.



Keywords


computational physics; creative thinking abilities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustinaningsih, W. (2020). Profil kreativitas calon guru fisika dengan manajemen pembelajaran berbasis gaya belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol.8(1), pp.112-125.

Aiken, L. R. (1985) Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability, and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, vol.45, pp.131-142.

Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence of learning strategy of cognitive conflict on student misconception in computational physics course. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.335, No.1, p.012074. IOP Publishing.

Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2019). Factors influencing the critical and creative thinking skills of college students in computational physics courses. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol.1317, No.1, p.012172. IOP Publishing.

Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: the question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol.3(1), pp.53-58.

Andari, T., & Lusiana, R. (2015). Profil kreativitas mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah geometri pada materi sistem koordinat ruang. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), vol.3(2).).

Angraini, L. M., Sudiarta, I. W., Qomariyah, N., Alaa, S., & Handayana, I. G. N. Y. (2019). Peningkatan kompetensi komputasi fisika dan kimia untuk mahasiswa program studi fisika fmipa universitas mataram. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, vol.2(2), pp.37-41.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Putra, T. T. (2012). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol.1(1).

Nur, M. (2014). Berpikir kreatif. Surabaya: Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi UNESA.

Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: independent or overlapping components. Thinking skills and creativity, vol.27, pp.114-122.

Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.

Hoiriyah, D. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal open-ended. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, vol.7(02), pp.201-212.

Darwanto, D. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Eksponen, vol.9(2), pp.20-26. Nurlaela, L., & Ismayati, E. (2015). Strategi belajar berpikir kreatif. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Simanjuntak, E., Hia, Y., & Manurung, N. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. School Education Journal PGSD FIP UNIMED, vol.9(3), pp.213-220.

Said L, M. (2015). Metode komputasi fisika. Makassar: Alauddin University Press.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2013. Penelitian pendidikan, jenis, metode dan prosedur. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Rex, B. K. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Third Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hari, Setyo. W. (2008). Structural equation modeling dengan lisrel 8.8: konsep dan tutorial.

Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v8i2.13783

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Gravity has been indexed by:

     
     

 

  

 

Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika is publihed by Department of Physics Education, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa jointly with Physical Society of Indonesia (PSI)

Creative Commons License 

Gravity : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Copyright © 2020, Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika.