Theme-Rheme Organization of Background Section in Research Proposal Introduction

Desih Nurdianti, John Pahamzah, Yusti Fargianti

Abstract


This study aimed to investigate what thematic development pattern frequently applied on students’ proposal year 2019 seen from three levels of achievement: low, middle, and high. Qualitative research as a method by implementing content analysis. The data of the study were 6 students’ proposal from low, middle, and high level of achievement. The steps in analyzing the data are first: taking texts written by the students, second: reading the texts and segmenting each  text into clauses, third: identifying theme and rheme of each clause of the students’ texts, fourth: identifying thematic development pattern of the students’ texts by using thematic development pattern proposed by Danes (1974), fifth: consulting the identified thematic development pattern to the experts, and sixth: calculating the amount of the occurrence of each thematic development pattern. The result shows that Constan Theme Progression (CTP) became the most applied pattern on high achievers’ text with the total number of occurrences 7 (63%). Constan Theme Progression (CTP) also became the most applied pattern on middle achievers’ text with the total number of occurrences 5 (55%) as well as on low achievers’ text, Constant Theme Progression became (CTP) the most applied pattern with the total number of occurrences 6 (50%). In conclusion, the students at University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa academic year 2019 who learn English as a foreign language mostly applied Constant Theme Progression in their research proposal.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Almurashi, W. A. 2016. An introduction to Halliday’s Systemic Functional linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 70-80.

Astalin, D. P. 2013. Qualitative Research Designs: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1.

Auda, Z. J. 2016. Academic Writing Course. Basrah: Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah.

Bailey, S. 2011. Academic Writing A Handbook for International Students. London: Routledge.

Bartels, N. 2005. Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education. Boston: springer.

Bloor, T. 2013. The functional analysis of English . New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. 2010. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Lincoln: Pearson.

Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.

Halliday, M. 2014. Intoduction to functional grammar. Oxon: Rutledge.

Halliday, M. A. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.

Hooks, B. 1999. Remembered Rapture The Writer at Work. New York: Henry Holt.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Mohd, S. 2005. How to Write a Research Proposal. The Family Physician, 3(2), 2.

Murray, R. 2005. Writing for Academic Journals. New York: Open University Press.

O’Farrell, D. M. 2016. Developing your academic writing skills: a Hand Book. Dublin: Academic Practice & eLearning.

Perin, S. G. 2007. Writing Next Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Washington DC: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York .

Pett, M. A. 2003. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. London: SAGE Publications.

Punch, K. 2000. Developing Effective Research Proposals Essential Resources for Social Research. Australia: Sage Publications, Inc.

Reiff, A. B. 2010. Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. United States of America: Parlor Press.

Rustipa, K. 2009. Theme-Rheme Organization of Learners’ Texts. Dinamika Bahasa dan Ilmu Budaya, Vol.4, 1.

Seken, A. 2013. An Analysis of The Cohesion and Coherence of Students` English Writings at the Second Grade of SMAN 1 West Lombok. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 1( 2).

Shannon, H.-F. H. 2015. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 1-2.

Suwandi. 2016. Coherence and Cohesion: An Analysis of the Final Project Abstracts of the Undergraduate Students of PGRI Semarang. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 253-261.

Wang, L. 2007. Wang, Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of text: implication for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal.

Wei Jing, M. 2013. Theme and thematic progression in learner English: A literature. Chongqing, China: Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal.

Whitaker, A. 2010. Academic Writing. Bratislava, Slovakia: City University of Seattle.

Yang, X. 2008. Thematic progression analysis in teaching exploration writing. English Language Teaching, 29-33.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jllp.v1i2.17676

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Journal of Linguistics, Literacy, and Pedagogy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright @2023 Journal of Linguistics, Literacy, and Pedagogy.

View My Stats