Hazard Potential Analysis at Banten 2 Steam Power Plant Using Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Method

Nustin Merdiana Dewantari, Ade Sri Mariawati, Resky Noer Alamsyah, Ani Umyati, Lely Herlina, Atia Sonda

Abstract


Banten 2 Steam Power Plant is a crucial facility in electricity generation, utilizing steam as an energy source to drive turbines and produce electricity. The power generation process involves several key stages, where high-temperature steam is converted into mechanical energy and then into electricity through turbine rotation. In its operation, Banten 2 Steam Power Plant involves many workers with diverse working conditions and areas, making the level of risk and workplace accidents a primary concern. The Job Safety Analysis method is used to identify potential hazards in various areas such as firefighting areas, chimneys, and water treatment plants. The research findings indicate varying potential hazards, including risks of stumbling, slipping, trapping, scratching, exposure to flames, electric shock, and being struck by materials. Risk assessment shows high-risk levels: 5 for welding in the firefighting area, 4 for flue gas sampling, 5 for hydrant welding, and 3 for duplication and installation of membranes, cartridges, and vessel RO. Risk control is carried out through elimination, engineering, administrative controls, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).

Full Text:

PDF

References


F. K. Galuh, E. Aristriyana, and M. Hilman, “Identifikasi Potensi Bahaya terhadap Pemadam Kebakaran Kota Banjar dengan Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis,” INTRIGA: Info Teknik Industri Galuh , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2023.

Y. Pratama and F. Yuamita, “Analisis Potensi Bahaya Pekerja PT. Madubaru PG/PS Madukismo pada Bagian Produksi dengan Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA),” ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 9, 2022.

I. R. Al Razy, E. Soesanto, and A. R. Agusman, “Identifikasi Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pada SPBE PTD dengan Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA),” Jurnal Bhara Petro Energi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/BPE

N. Hasnah, H. Ibrahim, and S. Syarfaini, “Studi Penilaian Risiko Keselamatan Kerja di Bagian Boiler PT Indonesia Power UPJP Bali Sub Unit PLTU Barru,” Higiene, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 82–92, 2018.

S. M. Ayii, M. Multazam, and N. Syam, “Penerapan Job Safety Analysis Dengan Kecelakaan Kerja di Bagian Refinery,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 383–390, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.35816/jiskh.v12i2.1099.

F. A. Yuliyono and M. Nuruddin, “Identifikasi Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja pada Bengkel Las Menggunakan Penekatan Job Safety Analysis,” RADIAL : Jurnal Peradaban Sains, Rekayasa dan Teknologi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11–22, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.37971/radial.v10i1.264.

M. I. Hamdani and D. Andesta, “Analisis Potensi Bahaya Menggunakan Metode JSA dan HIRARC untuk Mengurangi Angka Kecelakaan Kerja pada Area Workshop Fabrikasi PT. ABC,” G-Tech: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 887–895, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.33379/gtech.v8i2.4076.

S. Silvia, C. Balili, and F. Yuamita, “Analisis Pengendalian Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Bagian Mekanik Pada Proyek Pltu Ampana (2x3 Mw) Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA),” Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan (JTMIT), vol. 1, pp. 61–69, 2022.

B. H. Septiansyah and S. S. Dahda, “Analisis Risiko Bahaya Ketinggian Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Pada Bagian Pasang Baru di PT XYZ,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operation Management, vol. 6, no. 1, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31602/jieom.v6i1.10638.

I. P. Salsabilah, H. Hidayat, and A. W. Rizqi, “Analisis Risiko dan Upaya Pengendalian K3 di Area Workshop Bagian Pengelasan Garasi Angkutan Luar PT XYZ dengan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA),” JUSTI: Jurnal Sistem dan Teknik Industri, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 174–179, 2023.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/joseam.v3i1.24948

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa