Email this article 
Cognitive Process of Pre-service Science Teachers Using Problem-based Learning on Nervous System Concepts
Abstract
Cognitive Process (CP) is a mental process that occurs when a person forms new knowledge with fully conscious or unconscious actions. This study aimed to obtain an overview of the CP of students who are pre-service science teachers in learning the nervous system using a problem-based learning model. The sample of the research was 37 student pre-service science teachers, who were taking the 4th semester. Students’ CP is measured using a CP instrument that refers to Marzano’s taxonomy. Data is analyzed by looking at the average value and frequently occurring answers, then interpreting the findings with the underlying theory. The description of 4th semester pre-service students in science education on nervous system concepts shows that the ability to think in the cognitive system has not been well formed compared to the ability to believe in the metacognitive system and self-system. Based on these conditions, developing more appropriate learning strategies to develop the CP of science teacher candidates is still necessary.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, JA & Dewsbury, BM 2022, ‘Student Preference for Course Approach to Pedagogically Different Methodologies in Anatomy and Physiology’, Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 44, pp. 45-55. doi:10.1152/advan.00137.2020
Ainscough, L, Leung, R & Colhorpe, K 2019, ‘Learning How to Learn: Can Embedded Discussion Board Help First-year Student Discover New Learning Strategies?’, Advanced Physiology Educations, vol 44, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1152/advan.00065.2019.
Arends, RI 2007, Learning to Teach Seventh Edition, New York: The McGraw Hill Companies.
Bahri, A & Corebima, AD 2015, ‘The Contribution of Learning Motivation and Metacognitive Skill on Cognitive Learning Outcome of Students Within Different Learning Strategies’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 14, pp. 487-500.
Bork, F, Lehner, A, Eck, U, Navab, N, Waschke, J & Kugelmann, D 2020, ‘The Effectiveness of Collaborative Augmented sTeaching: A Quantitative and Qualitative Pilot Study’, Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 590-604. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2016
Cardozo, LT, Castro, AP, Guimaraes, AF, Gutierrez, LL, Montrezor, LH & Marcondez, FK 2020, ‘Integrating synapse, muscle contraction, and autonomic nervous system game: effect on learning and evaluation of student opinions’, Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 44, pp. 153-162. doi: 10.1152/advan.00169.2019
Creswell, JW 2020, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Siyasal Publishing, Ankara.
Daines, B, Berry, A, Daroowalla, F, Hirumi, A & Harris, DM 2019. ‘The Use of the 5E Instructional Design Strategy to Teach Respiratory Physiology to First-Year Medical Student’, Advanced in Physiology Education, vol. 43, pp. 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00116.2019
Erlin, E, Rahmat, A, Redjeki, S & Purwaningsih. W 2021, ‘Analisis berbagai Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran yang dapat Memberdayakan Kemampuan Metacognitif pada Pembelajaran Biologi’. Bioed: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 30-24. DOI: 10.25157/jpb.v9i2.6383
Gonzales, AA, Lizana, PA, Pino, S, Miller, BG & Merino, C 2020, ‘Augmented Reality-based Learning for Comprehension of Cardiac Physiology in Undergraduate Biomedical Students’, Adv Physiol Educ, pp. 314-322. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00137.2019
Grau, FGI, Valls, C, Piquen N & Ruiz-Martin, H 2021, ‘ The long-term effects of introducting the 5E model of Instuction on Students’ Conceptual Learning’, International Journal of Science Education. Vol 43, no. 9, pp. 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
Guy, R, Byrne, B & Dobos, M 2017, ‘Optional Anatomy and Physiology e-learning Resources: Student Access, Learning Approaches, and Academic Outcomes’, Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 42, pp. 43-49. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00007.2017
Halpin, PA, Donahue, AE & Jhonson 2020, ‘Undergraduate Biological Sciences and Biotecnology Students’ Reflective Essay Focus on Descriptive Details of Experiential Learning Experiences’. Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 44, pp. 99-103. doi:10.1152/advan.00144.2019.
Hansen, J & Richland, LE 2020, ‘Teaching and Learning Science Through Multiple Representations: Intuitions and Executive Functions’, CBE Life Science Education, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0253
Judge, JL, Carazes, VA, Thomson, Z & Skidmore, LA 2020, ‘Development of low-cost Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Laboratory Activities to Teach Physiology Concepts and The Scientific Method’, Adv Physiol Educ, pp. 181-187. doi: 10.1152/advan.00149.2019.
Kadarusman, K, Rahmat, A & Priyandoko, D 2020, ‘The Relationship of Students’ Thinking Level and Ability to Develop Proposition Network Representation of Human Nervous System in Modeling Based Learning (MbL)’, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. (JPII), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 361-370. DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24214
Khursid, A, Kashir, J, Sajid, MR, Rasool, AJ, Shaikh, AA, Ikram, MF, Yaqinuddin, A, Alshedouky, A & Ganguly, KP 2020, ‘Implementation of Structure Team-Based Review Enhances Knowledge Consolidation and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Medical Students Studying Neurosains’, Advanced in Physiology Education, vol. 44, pp. 232-238. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00162.2019
Kurnadi, KA 2009, Dasar-dasar Anatomi dan Fisiologi Tubuh Manusia 2, Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Kurt, H 2013, ‘Biology student teachers’ cognitive structure about “Living Thing”’, Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 871-880. doi:10.5897/ERR2013.1408
Lira, M & Gardner, SM 2020, ‘Leveraging multiple analytic frameworks to assess the stability of student knowledge in physiology’, CBE-Life Science Education, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0160
Martini, T & Nath 2018, Human Anatomy 9th Ed, New York: Pearson.
Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2007, ‘The New Taxonomy of Education Objective (Vol. 2nd). California: Corwin Press, Sage Publication.
McQueen, HA & McMillan, C 2018, ‘Quectures: Personalised Constructive Learning in Lectures’. Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418760325
Muthukrishnan, SP, Chandran, DS, Afreen, N, Bir, M, Dastidar, SG., Jayappa, H, Mattoo, B, Navneet, A, Poorasamy, J, Roy, A, Sharma, A, Ghoosh, D & Deepak, KK 2019, ‘Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of Multicomponent, Case-based Learning for First Year Indian Medical Undergraduates’, Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 43, pp. 504-511. doi: 10.1152/advan.00080.2019.
Nichols, K 2017, ‘Impact of Professional Learning on Teachers' Representational Strategies and Students' Cognitive Engagement with Molecular Genetics Concepts’, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1-16. DOI:10.1080/00219266.2017.1285800
Omarchevska, Y, Lachner, A, Richter, J & Scheiter, K 2021, ‘It takes two to tango: How scientific reasoning and self-regulation processes impact argumentation quality’, Journal of the Learning Science, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1-41. DOI:10.1080/10508406.2021.1966633
Prevost, LB & Lemons, PP 2016, ‘Step by Step: Biology Undergraduates’ Problem-Solving Prosedures During Multiple-Choice Assessment’, CBE-Life Science Education, vol. 15, pp. 1-14. DOI:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0255
Quiroga, MdM & Choate, JK 2019’, ‘A Virtual Experiment Improved Students' Understanding of Physiological Experimental Processes ahead of a live Inquiry-based Practical Class’, Advances Physiology Education, vol. 43, pp. 495-503, doi:10.1152/advan.00050.2019
Rahmat, A & Tuzzahra, DU 2022, ‘Level of Cognitive Processes in the Learning Tasks of Biology Class During Covid-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Student’s Cognitive Anxiety’, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Issue on ISCoE2022, pp. 88-105. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20ISCoE%202022_1/ISCoE%201_08.pdf
Reineke, NB, Kynn, M & Parkinson, AL 2020,‘Immersive 3D Experience of Osmosis Improves Learning Outcomes of First-year Cell Biology Student’, CBE Life Science Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-10. DOI:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0254
Reinoso, R & Iglesias, JD 2020, ‘Understanding Pre-service Teacher Conceptual Knowledge of Human Nutrition Processes Through Drawing’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1008-1019. DOI:10.33225/jbse/20.19.1008
Rickey N, DeLuca, C & Beach, P 2023, ‘Toward a New Theory of Student self-assessment: Tracking Learners’ Cognitive and Affective Processes’, Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09359-6
Sakir, NAI & Kim, JG 2020, ‘Enhancing Student Learning Activity and Outcomes via Implementation of Problem-based Learning’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 19-25. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9344
Smith, AD & Kelly, A 2016, ‘Cognitive Processes’, The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging, Pp. 1-4. DOI:10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa213
Tanti, T, Kurniawan, DA, Sukarni, W, Erika, E & Hoyi, R 2021, ‘Description of Student Responses Toward the Implementation of Problem-based Learning Model in Physics Learning’, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30-38. DOI: 10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1787
Tosun C & Senocak E 2013, ‘The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Metacognitive Awareness and Attitudes toward Chemistry of Prospective Teachers with Different Academic Backgrounds’, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 38, no 2, pp. 61-73. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n3.2
Villafañe, SM, Minderhout, V, Heyen, BJ, Lewis, JE, Manley, A, Murray, TA, Tienson-Tseng, H & Loertscher, J 2021, ‘Design and Implementation of a Tool to Assess Students' Understanding of Metabolic Pathways Dynamics and Regulation’, CBE-Life Science Education, vol. 20, no. 3, 1-15. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0078
Yıldırım, A & Şimsek, H 2006, Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Seçkin Publishing, Ankara.
Yuanphan, Y & Nuangchalerm 2023, ‘The Development of Grade 10 Students’ Mental Models on Solutions Througt Model-Centered Instruction’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93-108. DOI: 10.30870/jppi.v9i1.19145
Zangerolamo, L, Soares, GM, Rosa, LRdO, Santos, KR, Bronczek, GA, Marconato-Junior, E, Carneiro, EM & Barbosa-Sampaio, HC 2020, ‘The use of "Endocrine Circuit" as an active learning methodology to aid in the understanding of the human endocrine system’, Advances Physiology Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 124-130. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00123.2019
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v9i2.21274
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright © 2024 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. All rights reserved.