Preferred and Actual Opinions toward Inquiry-based Instruction of Primary Science Teachers in the Northeast of Thailand

Prasart Nuangchalerm, Veena Prachagool

Abstract


Inquiry-based instruction is widely used in science classrooms. It helps students and teachers employed student-centered approach as well as the advancements of academic development. This study explored preferred and actual opinions of 545 primary science teachers toward inquiry-based instruction. They were asked preferred and actual opinions through five components of inquiry-based instruction during workshop on active learning from 5 provinces. Data were collected through teachers’ inquiry-based instruction questionnaires. Data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, and percentage, also Pearson correlation was used for seeking its correlational significance. The findings showed that teachers had preferred and actual opinions of teachers toward inquiry-based instruction at high level. Also, phases of instruction, preferred and actual opinions are positively correlated. The findings need to be more discussed how teachers implement inquiry-based learning to their students in the classroom contexts.


Keywords


Inquiry; Teacher Perception; Instruction; Correlation; 5Es

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd-El-Khalick, E, Boujaoude, S, Duschl, R, Lederman, NG, Mamlok-Naaman, R, Hofstein, A, Niaz, M, Treagust, D & Tuan, H 2004, ‘Inquiry in science education: International perspectives’, Science Education, vol 88, pp. 397-419.

Anderson, JR, Reder, LM & Simon, HA 1996, ‘Situated learning and education’, Educational Researcher, vol 25, no 4, pp. 5-11.

Anderson, RD 2002, ‘Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry’, Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol 13, no 1, pp. 1-12.

Barrow, L 2006, ‘A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards’, Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol 17, pp. 265-78.

Bell, B & Gilbert, J 2005, Teacher development: A model from science education. Routledge.

Blumenfeld, PC, Krajcik, J, Marx, RW & Soloway, E 1994, ‘Lessons learned: A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction’, Elementary School Journal, vol 94, no 5, pp. 539-51.

Bruner, J 1996, The culture of education. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Bybee, RW 2000, ‘Achieving technological literacy: A national imperative’ The Technology Teacher, vol 60, no 1, pp. 23-8.

Bybee, RW 2004, ‘Science inquiry and science teaching’, In Flick, LB & Lederman NG (eds). Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cakir, M 2008, ‘Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review’, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, vol 4, no 3, pp. 193-206.

Carin, AA & Bass, JE 1997, Teaching science as inquiry. New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Crawford, BA 2007, ‘Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 44, no 4, pp. 613-42.

DeBoer, GE 1991, A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Goldsmith, LT & Seago, N 2011, ‘Using classroom artifacts to focus teacher’s noticing’, In Sherin, MG, Jacob, VR & Philipp, RA (eds). Mathematics Teacher Noticing: Seeing through Teachers’ Eye. New York: Routledge.

Harlen, W 2000, The teaching of science in primary schools. 3rd ed. London: David Fulton.

Krajcik, J, Blumenfeld, P, Marx, RW & Soloway, E 1994, A collaborative model for helping science teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, vol 94, no 5, pp. 483-98.

Lederman, NG, Abd-El-Khalick, F, Bell, R & Schwartz, R 2002, ‘Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 39, no 6, pp. 497-521.

Lotter, C, Harwood, WS & Bonner, JJ 2007, ‘The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 44, no 9, pp. 1313-47.

Martin-Hansen, L 2002, ‘Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom’, The Science Teacher, vol 69, no 2, pp. 34-7.

Minstrell, J 2000, ‘Implications for teaching and learning inquiry: A summary’, In Minstrell, J & van Zee, E (eds). Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

National Research Council 1996, National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nuangchalerm, P 2010, ‘Engaging students to perceive nature of science through socioscientific issues-based instruction’, European Journal of Social Sciences, vol 13, no 1, pp. 34-7.

Nuangchalerm, P 2013, ‘Engaging students to perceive nature of science through inquiry-based classroom’, Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, vol 8, no 3, pp. 200-3.

Nuangchalerm, P 2014, ‘Inquiry-based learning in China: Lesson learned for school science practices’, Asian Social Science, vol 10, no 13, pp. 64-71.

Nuangchalerm, P 2017, ‘Relationship between preferred and actual opinions about inquiry-based instruction classroom’, European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol 5, no 1, pp. 67-73.

Nuangchalerm, P, Dostál, J & Luo, X 2016, ‘Investigating pre-service secondary science teachers' practices about inquiry-based instruction during school practicum’, Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, vol 25, no 4, pp. 487-95.

Patrick, H, Mantzicopoulos, P & Samarapungavan, A 2009, ‘Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 46, no 2, pp. 166-91.

Pedaste, M, Mäeots, M, Siiman, LA, De Jong, T, Van Riesen, SA, Kamp, ET, Manoli, CC, Zachari, ZC & Tsourlidaki, E 2015, ‘Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle’, Educational research Review, vol 14, pp. 47-61.

Pottenger, FM 2007, Inquiry and disciplinary natural science teaching. Paper presented at the Hawai‘i International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI.

Qodar, R, Samsiah, S & Haryanto, Z 2018, ‘The use of affective and cognitive assessment on the learning of mirrors and lenses through the inquiry laboratory approach’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol 4, no 1, pp. 25-34.

Roehrig, GH & Luft, JA 2004, ‘Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons’, International Journal of Science Education, vol 26, no 1, pp. 3-24.

Roth, W 1996, ‘Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 33, no 7, pp. 709-36.

Rutherford, FJ 1964, The role of inquiry in science teaching’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 2, no 2, pp. 80-4.

Saefullah, A, Samanhudi, U, Nulhakim, L, Berlian, L, Rakhmawan, A, Rohimah, B & El Islami, RAZ 2017, ‘Efforts to improve scientific literacy of students through guided inquiry learning based on local wisdom of Baduy’s society’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol 3, no 2, pp. 84-91.

Schwab, J 1965, Biological sciences curriculum study: Biology teachers’ handbook. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Schwab, J 1966, The teaching of science. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

Seraphin, K & Baumgartner, E 2010, ‘Students as scientists: Guidelines for teaching science through disciplinary inquiry’, In Yager, RE (ed). Exemplary science for resolving societal challenges. Virginia: National Science Teachers Association-NSTA Press.

Sund, RB & Trowbridge, LW 1973, Teaching science by inquiry in the secondary school. 2nd ed. Ohio: Merrill.

Wang, J, Kao, H & Lin, S 2010, ‘Preservice teachers' initial conceptions about assessment of science learning: The coherence with their views of learning science’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol 26, no 3, pp. 522-29.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i1.4766

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Copyright © 2021 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. All rights reserved.