MODEL KOMUNIKASI DALAM PENGELOLAAN KONFLIK PEMBANGUNAN GEOTERMAL DI KABUPATEN SERANG

Ail Muldi

Abstract


Geothermal conflict in Serang Regency is occured because communication approach is inappropriately done between the company part and local affected community. Geothermal conflict map involves the company geothermal exploration permit holder, regional government, and local community who live in districts around Mount Prakasak Padarincang, becoming a geothermal location. The research was carried out using qualitative method with study case approach. Conflict of geothermal project seen from its characteristic is environmental conflict. Sealed communication of the company made an information gap impact to the creation of different perception with local community about the interest of geothermal construction in Serang regency. Perception gap between both parts underlied the vertical conflict of geothermal environmental came to the peak stage of conflict. Communication between both conflict parts is defensive and confrontational, also tending to violence. Geothermal conflict that nowadays happen surmised will be potential for violence that disserving both parts.

Full Text:

PDF (117 - 134)

References


Adejimola AS. 2009. Language and communication in conflict resolution. J Law and Confl Resol. 1(1): 001-009.

DeFleur MH, Kearney P, Plax TG, DeFleur ML. 2014. Fundamentals of Human Communication: Social Science in Everyday Life, Fourth Edition. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Dixon, A. B., & Wood, A. P. (2007). Local institutions for wetland management in Ethiopia: sustainability and state intervention. In B. van Koppen, Giordano M, Butterworth J, editor. Wallingford(UK): CABI International.

Engel A, Korf B. 2005. Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

Fisher S, Abdi DI, Ludin J, Smith R, Williams S, William S. 2001. Mengelola Konflik: Ketrampilan dan Strategi untuk Bertindak. Alih Bahasa oleh S.N. Kartikasari dkk. Zed Books, The British Council.

Gibb, JR. 1961. Defensive Communication . Journal of Comm. 11: 141-148.

Kaye M. 1998. Communication Management. Sydney(AUS): Prentice Hall Australia.

Kinseng RA. 2013. Identifikasi potensi, analisis dan resolusi konflik. Di dalam: Nikijuluw VPH, Adrianto L, Januarini N, editor. Coral Governance. Bogor (ID): IPB Pr. hlm 335-372

Kriesberg L. 2011. Constructive conflict: from escalation to resolution. 4th Edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publisher, Inc.

Kuswarno, E. 2009. Fenomenologi : Konsepsi, Pedoman dan Contoh Penelitian. Bandung : Widya Padjadjaran.

Marques AS, Ramos TB, Caeiro S, Costa MH. 2011. Adaptive-participative sustainability indicators in Marine Protected Areas : Design and communication. Ocean and Coastal Management, (72): 36-45.

Miall H, Woodhouse T, Ramsbotham O. 1998. Resolusi Damai Konflik Kontemporer. Jakarta(ID): Rajagrafindo Persada.

Miles MB, Huberman M, Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Ed ke-3. California (US): Sage Publ.

Moeleong, LJ. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslim A, Kolopaking LM, Dharmawan AH, Soetarto E. 2015. Dinamika Peran Sosial Politik Ulama dan Jawara di Pandeglang Banten. Mimbar, 31(2): 461-474.

Prenzel PV, Vanclay F. 2014. How social impact assesment can contribute to conflict management. Env Imp Ass Rev. 45:30-37.

Pruitt DG, Rubin JZ. 2004. Teori Konflik Sosial. Yogyakarta (ID) : Pustaka Pelajar

Putnam, LL. 2013. Definitions and approaches to conflict. In: Oetzel JG, Ting-Toomey S, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice, “2nd ed”. London (GB): SAGE Publ, Inc.

Satria, A. 2009. Ekologi politik nelayan. Yogyakarta: LkiS

Sumardjo. 2006. Komunikasi dalam perspektif ekologi manusia. Di dalam: Adiwibowo S, editor. Ekologi Manusia. Bogor(ID): FEMA IPB.

Sumardjo. 2015. Pemberdayaan: Alternatif perluasan strategi deradikalisasi. Makalah utama disampaikan dalam seminar nasional; 2015 Okt 13; Bogor, Indonesia. Bogor(ID): IICC.

Soekanto S dan Sulistyowati B. 2017. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Susan JT, Wim HJM. 2007. Empathy and conflict resolution in friendship relations among adolescents. Aggress Behav. 33:48–55. doi: 10.1002/ab.20166.

Yin RK. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Ed ke-5. California (US): Sage Publ, Inc.

WB. 2014. Perkembangan Triwulanan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): The World Bank.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jrk.v12i1.11739

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Recent Issues


        Vol. 13 No. 1 2022        Vol. 12 No. 2 2021        Vol. 12 No. 1 2021       Vol. 11 No. 2 2020        Vol. 11 No. 1 2020

 

 

 

Common License
Journal Publisher
Publisher Address

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Riset Komunikasi is published by Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University


Jl. Raya Palka Km 3 Sindangsari, Pabuaran, Kab. Serang Provinsi Banten., Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Kampus Pakupatan, Serang, Banten, Indonesia.

Telepon/Fax: (0254) 280330,
Email: [email protected]


View My Stats