Proses metakognisi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi numerasi domain geometri dan pengukuran

Ida Rosita, Hepsi Nindiasari, Sukirwan Sukirwan

Abstract


Numerical literacy used to the ability understanding various contexts mathematics of daily life problems. One of that success factors is metacognition influenced. An important role of metacognition process to regulating and controlling cognitive thinking. This qualitative study aims to describe students' metacognition processes in solving numeracy questions geometrical and measuring domain. The subjects who are students of class IX.F SMPN 1 Malingping, Lebak Regency. The selected subjects completed successfully the challenge of numeracy on three cognitive levels of geometry measurement domain, communicative, and willing to subjects. Collected data got from tests and interviews. The results showed that the students' metacognitive process activities occurred different qualities and tendencies. Metacognitive awareness activities are identified from solution plan, gather information and fulfill prerequisites, both in pictures or sentences. Metacognitive regulation activities are reflected to carry out planning skills execution, strategies working used formula concepts or direct to the point execution. Metacognitive evaluation activities to consider limited knowledge and results quality, correctly self-assess answer questions, an error, explain solutions, re-check and final conclusions. There are students who able an assess error and correct them, but also those who don’t correct them because self-confidence who thinks what they are doing is appropriate.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdussakir, A. (2012). Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. JUrnal Madrasah, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/jt.v2i1.1832

Chairani, Z. (2016). Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Penerbit Deepublish CV Budi Utama.

Kartika, L. D., Riyadi, & Sujadi, I. (2015). Proses metakognisi dalam pemecahan masalah matematika pada siswa kelas XI di SMA Banyumas. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(9), 1021–1034.

Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of mathematics anxiety and mathematical metacognition on word problem solving in children with and without mathematical learning difficulties. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130570

LeFevre, J. A., Polyzoi, E., Skwarchuk, S. L., Fast, L., & Sowinski, C. (2010). Do home numeracy and literacy practices of Greek and Canadian parents predict the numeracy skills of kindergarten children? International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669761003693926

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications.

Nindiasari, H. (2011). Pengembangan bahan ajar dan instrumen untuk meningkatkan berpikir reflektif matematis berbasis pendekatan metakognitif pada siswa sekolah menengah atas (SMA). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIFA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta., 251–263. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/7378/

Nindiasari, H., ViviYandari, I., Khaerunnisa, E., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2018). The skill in designing explorative learning tools of mathematics pre-service teachers through explorative learning based on metacognitive scaffolding. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00105. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200105

Pangesti, F. T. P. (2018). Menumbuhkembangkan literasi numerasi pada pembelajaran matematika dengan soal hots. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5(9), 566–575. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org

Prihatnani, E., & Supriyadi, D. (2020). Proses metakognisi mahasiswa calon guru matematika dalam memecahkan masalah piramida hitung. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 210–226. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/36732

Rosita, I., Syamsuri, Nindiasari, H., & Sukirwan. (2021). Analisis keterampilan metakognisi siswa SMP dengan gaya kognitif reflektif-impulsif dalam pemecahan masalah geometri. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 6(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v6i2.4705

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology (Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 460–475). https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Setiawan, H., Dafik, & Lestari, N. D. S. (2014). Soal Matematika Dalam Pisa Kaitannya Dengan Literasi Matematika Dan Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, November, 244–251.

Setyadi, D. (2018). Proses metakognisi mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika (studi kasus pada mahasiswa pendidikan matematika UKSW). Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.13505

Shetty, D. G. (2014). A Study of the metacognition levels of student teachers on the basis of their learning styles. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04154351

Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (n.d.). Feature: Evidence-based teaching guide to student metacognition.Instructor checklist-student metacognition. https://lse.ascb.org/evidence-based-teaching-guides/student-metacognition/

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.

Sukirwan, Darhim, Herman, T., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). The students’ mathematical argumentation in geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012026

Tampi, W., Subanji, & Sisworo. (2017). Proses metakognisi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah aljabar berdasarkan taksonomi SOLO. Jurnal Matematika, 7(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmat.2017.v07.i01.p80

Thomas, G., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701482493

Tim Erlangga. (2020). Fokus Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) SMP/MTs. Penerbit Erlangga.

Warsito, Muhtadi, D., Sukirwan, & Saleh, H. (2020). The role of progressive mathematics in geometry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012042

Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217394




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.48181/tirtamath.v4i1.16345

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 TIRTAMATH: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional .

Tirtamath: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa (cetak) dan Jurnal Untirta (eprint).

Alamat Penerbit: Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Kampus FKIP Untirta Jl. Ciwaru Raya, Cipare, Kec. Serang, Kota Serang, Banten 42117, Email: [email protected] |Klik untuk mengakses: Tirtamath: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika