Kinetic Analysis of Biogas Production from Poultry Manure Waste using Gompertz, Transference, and Logistic Models

Achmad Faizal Ibrahim, Elisa Restu Dian Najiyah, Mohamad Farrel Abigail, Muhamad Ariel Satria, Iqbal Syaichurrozi

Abstract


Biogas production through anaerobic fermentation is a promising renewable energy alternative that continues to gain attention. To improve the accuracy and efficiency of production predictions, kinetic modeling approaches that describe the underlying biological processes are essential. This study compares three kinetic models Gompertz, Logistic, and Transference in predicting biogas production under varying pH conditions, with the aim of identifying the model that best represents the experimental data. The models were evaluated based on parameters including maximum production capacity (Ym), maximum production rate (U), lag time (λ), and prediction errors quantified by the sum of squared errors (SSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²). The results demonstrate that the Transference model consistently outperforms the other models. At neutral pH (pH 7), the Transference model predicted a maximum biogas production of 2127.11 cm³, a maximum daily production rate of 158.23 cm³/day, a short lag phase of 0.947 days, a low SSE value of 3223.45, and an R² value of 1.000, indicating an excellent fit to the experimental data. Compared to the Gompertz and Logistic models, the Transference model exhibited greater stability, accuracy, and realism in representing the biogas production process. These findings indicate that the Transference model is a reliable predictive tool for the design and optimization of biogas production systems, particularly under optimal pH conditions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abubakar, A. M., Umdagas, L. B., Waziri, A. Y., & Itamah, E. I. (2022). Estimation of biogas potential of liquid manure from kinetic models at different temperature. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJSRCSE), 10(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6835863.

Adebimpe, O. A., Edem, I. E., & Ayodele, O. L. (2020). Investigation of the effects of starting pH, mass and retention time on biogas production using poultry droppings as feedstock. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 39(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v39i1.23.

Alharbi, M., & Alkathami, B. S. (2024). Modeling of Biogas Production of Camel and Sheep Manure Using Tomato and Rumen as Co-Substrate via Kinetic Models. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(8), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/189231.

Ali, M. M., Bilal, B., Dia, N., Youm, I., & Ndongo, M. (2018). Anaerobic Digestion (AD), Methane production potential, Kinetic models, Ambient temperature, Slaughterhouse waste, Salvinia molesta; Anaerobic Digestion (AD), Methane production potential, Kinetic models, Ambient temperature, Slaughterhouse waste, Salvini. 8(3), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ep.20180803.01.

Henuk, Y. L., & Dingle, J. G. (2003). Poultry manure: Source of fertilizer, fuel and feed. In World’s Poultry Science Journal (Vol. 59, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030022.

Kementerian ESDM. (2021). Handbook Energy & Economic Statistics Indonesia 2021. In Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Republic of Indonesia.

Nanang Apriandi, Yanuar, P., Kristiawan, T. A., Widodo, I. G., Safarudin, Y. M., & Raharjanti, R. (2022). Penyuluhan Potensi Biogas Dari Limbah Kotoran Ternak Di Desa Campuranom, Kecamatan Bansari, Kabupaten Temanggung. Medani : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.59086/jpm.v1i2.118.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2017). Rencana Umum Energi Nasional. In No. 22 (pp. 1–103).

Petroleum. (2023). bp Energy Outlook 2023 edition 2023 explores the key trends and uncertainties. Statistical Review of World Energy, July, 1–53.

Pöschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P. (2010). Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. In Applied Energy (Vol. 87, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011.

Pramanik, S. K., Suja, F. B., Porhemmat, M., & Pramanik, B. K. (2019). Performance and kinetic model of a single- stage anaerobic digestion system operated at different successive operating stages for the treatment of food waste. Processes, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090600.

Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J. F., & Fahl, F. (2018). Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe. In Renewable Energy (Vol. 129, pp. 457–472). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.

Shitophyta, L. M., Arnita, A., & Wulansari, H. D. A. (2023). Evaluation and modelling of biogas production from batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover with oxalic acid. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 69(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.17221/98/2022-RAE.

Velichkova, P., Ivanov, T., & Lalov, I. (2022). Development of Simplified Models for Optimization of Biochemical Methane Potential Procedure. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 57(4), 702–708.

Verma, V. K., Banodha, U., & Malpani, K. (2024). Optimization with Adaptive Learning: A Better Approach for Reducing SSE to Fit Accurate Linear Regression Model for Prediction. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(10), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0151019




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62870/wcej.v9i1.33624

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025

WCEJ (e-ISSN: 2443-2261) is published by Chemical Engineering Department, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa (UNTIRTA).

This Journal has been indexed by:

  1. Google Scholar
  2. Garuda
  3. Dimensions
  4. Crossref
  5. Open Academic Journal Index
  6. Journal Impact Factor
  7. Cite Factor 
Archives: Resources | Dimensions CrossrefJIFACTOR, Journal Indexing  

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.