Audience Awareness in EFL Writers: A Preliminary Study at English Education Study Program University of Jambi

Dedy Kurniawan, Hidayati Hidayati

Abstract


As a mode of communication, writing should be viewed as representing a dialog between the writers and their readers. This view of writing as a social process (e.g. Hyland, 2003) advocates that writers should try to accommodate their readers’ interests, needs, expectations, etc., in their writings. This concept called “Audience Awareness”, is very crucial to writing instructions, and has been considered as a writing skill that has to be mastered by skilled writers (Clark, 2003; Hyland, 2003). However, apart from somewhat vague instructions for the learners to “consider your readers when writing”, this notion is relatively rarely discussed and studied, particularly in Indonesian context. This preliminary study aims at investigating audience awareness as perceived by Indonesian EFL writers. The primary data of this descriptive qualitative study were collected through interviews to 12 students of English Education Study Program, University of Jambi, selected purposively by applying maximum variation sampling strategy. The data were analysed thematically. Four salient themes emerging from the study, i.e.: (1) Vague awareness of the audience, (2) (in)ability to address the audience, (3) effects of real readers to audience awareness, and (4) lack of instruction in audience awareness, as well as their pedagogical implications are discussed in depth in this paper.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bell, A. (1984). Language Style as Audience Design Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204.

Berkenkotter, C. (1981). Understanding a writer’s awareness of audience. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), pp. 388-399.

Carvalho, J. B. (2002). Developing audience awareness in writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 271-282.

Clark, I. (eds) (2003). Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing

Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), pp. 143-159.

Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience Addressed/Audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35(2), pp. 155-171.

Frank, L. (1992). Writing to be read: Young writers’ ability to demonstrate audience awareness when evaluated by their readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(3), 277-297.

Harmer, J (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Education Ltd.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, England; New York: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. New York: Continuum.

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1997). Theory and practice of writing. New York: Addison Wesley, Longman Ltd.

Johns, A. M. (1993). Written argumentation for real audiences: Suggestions for teacher research and classroom practice. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 75-90.

Johnston, B. (2007). Theory and research: Audience, language use, and language learning. In J. Egbet, & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), (pp. 61-69). Alexandria, VA: TESOL, Inc.

Lapp, D., Shea, A., & Wolsey, T. D. (2011). Blogging and audience awareness Journal of Education.

Wollman-Bonilla, J. (2001). Can first-grade writers demonstrate audience awareness? Reading Research Quarterly, 36(2), 184.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @ Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.

View My Stats