The Role of Peer and Teacher Feedback in Academic Writing Class

Taufiqulloh Taufiqulloh, Yuvita Yuvita, Imam Yuliarto

Abstract


Writing skill enables the writer to communicate a variety of messages to a close or distance, known or unknown readers. Viewing the importance of writing as communication, students are encouraged to express and organize their ideas into a text that need to be clear, relevant, truthful, informative, and interesting. The writing process forces greater demands on the text since written interaction lacks immediate feedback as a guide. This study investigates the role of teacher and peer feedback inserted in the steps of writing process on students’ writing achievement in academic writing for English department students. The writing processes include some steps; creating, planning, writing and polishing. The results showed that the technique contributed a significant improvement to the students writing achievement. To conclude, the role of teacher and peer feedback is considered to be one of the effective ways for the students in practicing writing.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Cho, K. & MacArthur, C. (in press). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction.

Bijami, Maryam et al. (2013). Peer Feedback in Learning English Writing, Advantages and Disadvantages. Journal of Studies in Education.Vol.3 No.4.pp.91-97.

Boscolo, P. & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of Collaborative Revision on Children’s Ability to Write Understandable Narrative Texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanqouy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (Vol. 13, pp. 157-170). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.

Gielen, Sarah et al. (2010). A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback and of Various Peer Feedback Forms in a Secondary School Writing Curriculum. British Educational Journal, 36,1. Februari 2010: 143-162

Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onhema, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback and of Various Peer Feedback Forms in a Secondary Writing Curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 143–162 doi:10.1080/01411920902894070

Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304.

Lea, M., and B. Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23, no. 2: 157–72.

Oshima A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English. New York: Longman

Peterson, Shelley S. (2010). Improving students Writing using Feedback as Teaching Tools: Research into Practice: University of Toronto October 2010

Peterson, Shelley S. (2013). Peer Feedback on writing: An assessment for learning. Research for Teacher: University of Toronto Februari 2013

Purnawarman, Pupung. (2011). A Disertation: Impact of Teacher Feedback on ESL/EFL Students’ Writing: Blackburg VA. November 29,2011

Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education, 5, 77–84.

Topping, K. J. (2003) Self- and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility, in: M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds) Optimizing new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic).

William, Jason G. 2003. Providing feedback on ESL students’ writing assignment. Internet TESL Journal, IX, 10, October 2003

Wingate, Ursula. 2010. The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assessment and Evaluation in higher education, 35,5, 519-533 August 2010

Yang, M., Badger, R. & Yu, Z. (2006) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v0i0.10906

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @2024 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.