AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHER’S TALK IN CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT SMPN 5 KOTA SERANG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2018-2019

Julya Maulida Karuniasih, Sutrisno Sadji Evenddy, Dhafid Wahyu Utomo, Pupun Sampurna

Abstract


The main objective of this research is to shed light on the the categories of teacher’s talk that occur in English teaching and learning process at grade VIII-B of SMPN 5 Kota Serang based the framework FIACS (Flander’s Interaction Analysis Categories System). The students of VIII-B and an English teacher of VIII-B class at SMPN 5 Kota Serang were chosen as participants of this research. In this research, the researchers used qualitative descriptive method in collecting the data. The instruments of this research were observation sheet and video recording. Moreover, the teacher’s talk during the classroom activity was the main data of this research. The findings reveals that the most dominant type used by the teacher is lecturing (29.8%), followed by asking questions (22.8%), giving directions (21.1%) and the last category is criticizing or justifying authority (3.5%). In the classroom activity, the indirect talk is lower than direct talk. The teacher tended to choose direct talk, so called: lecturing, giving direction, criticizing or justifying authority in delivering the materials to the students


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amidon, E. (1966). Interaction Analysis. Recent developments. Temple University

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching, Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Longman.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition. San Fransisco: Longman.

Chambliss, D.F., & Schutt, R.K. (2013) Making sense of the social world, methods of investigation (fourth edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.

Cook, V. (2000). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching (2nd Edition). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Crespo, S. (2002). Praising and Correcting: Prospective Teachers Investigate Their Teacherly Talk. Teacher and Teacher Education 18, 739-758.

Dagarin, M. (2004). Classroom Interaction and Communication Strategies in Learning English as aForeign. Ljubljana: ELOPE.

Flander, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teacher behaviour. new York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

French, R. L., & Galloway, C. M. (1968). A Description of Teacher Behaviour: Verbal and Nonverbal. 1-8. The Ohio University.

Gharbavi, A., & Iravani, H. (2014). Is Teacher Talk Pernicious to Students? A Discourse Analysis of Teacher Talk. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 98, 552-561.

Inamullah. (2008). Teacher-student verbal interction patterns at the tertiary level of education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research Vol. 1, 45-50.

Kaur, G. (2010). Study and Analysis of Lecture model of teaching. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 9-13.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Parameshwara, K. B. (2015). Questioning in ESL Classroom-An Interaction Analysis. Golden Research Thoughts. 5(4), 1-9.

Putri, F. G. (2014). An Analysis of Classroom Interaction by using Flander Interaction Analysis Categories Aystem (FIACS) Technique at SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu in 2013/2014 Academic Year. University of Bengkulu.

Radford, L. Classroom Interaction: Why is it good, really? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 101-115.

Richards, Keith. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL.Aston University: MacMillan.

SK Hai & LS. Bee. (2006). Study of Teacher-Student Interaction in Teaching Process and its Relation with Students’ Achievement in Primary Schools. Malaysia. The Social Sciences.

Sofyan, R. R, & Mahmud, M. (2014).Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction: A study at an English Department in Indonesia. ELTWorldwide Vol. 1 No. 1, 46-58.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukma, B. P., & Utomo, D. W. (2016). Interpersonal Metadiscourse in the Jakarta Post E-News Opinion Articles. Jurnal BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 3(1), 17-27.

Taping, M. G., Juniardi, Y., & Utomo, D. W. (2017). Rhetorical Devices in Hillary Clinton Concession Speech. Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2).

Walsh, s. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom language teching research, 6(1), 3-23.

Wardana, A. (2016). Analysis of the Teacher Talk in the Classroom Interaction (A Descriptive Qualitative Study at the second Grade of SMAN 1 Sukamakmur). Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh.

Yanfen, L., & Yuqin, Z. (2010). A Study of Teacher Talk in Interactions in English Classes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33 (2), 76-86.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v3i3.11117

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @2024 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.