ENGLISH LEARNING WEBSITES FOR NURSING STUDENTS’ CORRECTION IN WRITING NURSING CARE PLAN AT STIKES FALETEHAN SERANG

Nisa Nuranisa, Syafrizal Syafrizal, Nurhaeda Gailea

Abstract


The aims of this research were: (1) to find out the types of English learning websites referred by STIKes Faletehan nursing students, (2) to investigate how STIKes Faletehan  nursing students’ self-correct their NCP, and (3) to analyze the responses of STIKes Faletehan  nursing students’ on the use of English learning websites to assist their NCP writing self – correction. The population of this research was 15 nursing students of STIKes Faletehan, Serang. The researcher used descriptive qualitative research, where the nursing students recorded the use of the English language websites in a logbook and interviewed by the researcher to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their experience, feedback and comments. The results showed that 93% referred to the notes, and 87% referred to the websites of software that corrected the sentences overtly and directly, there were three way to do their self-correction (1) checking only one website to find all errors, (2) checking different website to check all errors, (3) checking different website to check one error, and positive responses and remarks stated that the use of English Language teaching websites was effective in helping participants’ self-correction. However, negative responses were also to be taken into consideration.


Full Text:

PDF

References


https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/self-correction. (2009). Retrieved february 18, 2019

Abas, I. H., & Aziz, N. H. (2016). Classification of L2 writing process and writing strategies. ICECRS, 367-380.

AbuSeileek. (2013). Using peer computer mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners' writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 319-333.

Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The role of E-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research.

Ballantyne, H. (2016). Developing nursing care plans. Nursing Standard. , 51–60.

Bitchener, Y. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 191-205.

Borstorff, P. C., & Lowe, S. (2007). Student perceptions and opinions toward e-learning in thecollege environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13–30.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: and Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: A Pearson Education Company.

Chandler, J. (2003). The Efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 264-296.

Doenges, M., Moorehouse, M., & Murr, A. (2014). Nursing care plans: guidelines for individualizing client care across the life span (9th ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 15.

Erdogan, V. (2005). Contributions of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin University Journal of Education, 261-270.

Erfanian, M. (2002). The Effect of self-correction strategy on the development of learners' linguistic competence. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University.

Feez, S. (2002). Text Based Syllabus Design. Sydney: NCELTR Macquaire University.

Ganji, M. (2009). Teacher correction, peer correction and self correction: their impacts on Iranian students' IELTS essay writing performance. Journal of Asia TEFL.

Grenville, K. (2001). Writing from Start to Finish: A Six Step Guides. Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Hammer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Malaysia: Pearson Education ltd.

Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education setting. Albany: State University of New Yorl Press.

Hook, R. (2016). Developing Nursing care Plans. Nursing Standard, 64-65.

Hooks, R. (2016). Developing nursing care plans. Nursing Standard., 64–65. .

Hourani, T. (2008). An analysis of the common grammatical errors in the english writing made by 3rd secondary male students in the eastern coast of the UAE. Dubai: Institute of Education of the British University.

Hussain, Z., Hanif, M., Asif, S. I., & Rehman, A. U. (2013). An error analysis of L2 writing at higher secondary level in Multan, Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 828-844.

Islam, M. (2011). Independent English learning through the internet. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London: Longman.

Kirana, S. L., Evenddy, S. S., & Utomo, D. W. (2018, September). Designing a model of writing material of english for tourism subject by using communicative approach at English department Untirta. In PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) (Vol. 2, No. 2).

Kirkgoz, Y. (2010). An Analysis of written errors in Turkish adult learners of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4352-4358.

Lam, W. (2006). Gauging the Effect of ESL oral communicative strategy teaching: A Multi method approach. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 142-157.

Lee, S. (2005). Facilitating ang inhibiting factors in English as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation. Journal of Language Learning Vol. 52, 335-374.

Li, S. (2012). Individual differences in written corrective feedback: A multi case study. English Language Teaching, 38-44.

Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2003). Exploring the World Wide Web for on-line learning: a perspective from Taiwan. Educational Technology, 27-32.

Lyster, R. (1998). Recast, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. studies in Second Language Acquisition, 51-81.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Family Health International, North Carolina, USA.

Makino, T. (1993). Learner self -correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal, 337-341.

Mardijono, J. (2003). Indonesian EFL Advanced Learners' Grammatical Errors. K@ta vol 5(1), 67-90.

McDonald, C. R. (2002). Teaching Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

McKimm, J. (2003). Web based learning. ABC of Learning and Teaching.

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Ed. Newbury Park: CA, Sage.

Mustafa, F. (2016). Errors in EFL writing by junior high studenys in Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning.

Mustafa, F., Kirana, M., & Bahri Ys, S. (2017). Errorrs in EFL writing by junior high students in Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 38-52.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.

Nursingworld. (n.d.). https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/workforce/what-is-nursing/the-nursing-process/. Retrieved March Wednesday, 2019

Olimat, S. I., & AbuSeileek, A. f. (2014). Using computer mediated corrective feedback modes in developing students' writing performance. Teaching English with Technology.

Paris, N., Ngonkum, S., & Nazaruddin, R. (2017). Types of written corrective feedback: Overview of teachers' implementation in Indonesia. The 5th AASIC.

Pishghadam, R. M. (2011). Self correction among Iranian EFL learners: An investigation into their preferences for corrective feedback. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.

Ramirez Balderas, I., & Guillen Cuamatzi, P. (2018). Self and peer correction to improve college students' writing skills. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 179-194.

Razagifard, P., & Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 1-17.

RNCentral. (2003). http://www.rncentral.com/nursing-library/careplans/. Retrieved March 14, 2019

Saeed, A., Hussain, S., & Fatima, S. (2015). Prepositional errors in the writings of Pakistani ESL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 120-128.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on RSL learners' acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly vol. 41, 255-283.

Shirotha, F. (2016). The effect of Indirect written corrective feedback on students' writing accuracy. Journal of English as a Foreign Language, 101-118.

Sou, G. (2006). The real value of e-education. Education Today, 23-27.

Spratt, M. e. (2005). The TKT Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tao, Y. (2006). Improving training needs assessment process via the internet: system design and qualitative study. Internet Research, 427-48.

Tariq, A. N., & Yusof, M. A. (2016). The Secondary School Students' usage of English Learning Websites to Self-correct Writing errors. ASIAN TEFL.

Taylor, G. (2005). Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in research (2nd Ed). Oxford, UK: University Press of America.

Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5-28.

Vera, M. (2019, March 13). https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-care-plans/. Retrieved March 14, 2019

Waltz, J. (1982). Error correction techniques for the foreign language classroom. United States : Center foe applied linguistic.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assesing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wihadi, M., & Martiana, I. (2015). The effect of teacher's written feedbacks of Indonesian EFL learners' recount writing competence. Indonesian EFL Journal, 63-68.

Wijayatiningsih, T. (2015). Direct Corrective feedback on Students' writing performance. The 4th ELTLT International Conference Procedings, 873-880.

Worcester, U. o. (2012). Study skills advice sheet:Learning journal.

Yusof, M. A. (2002). Perception of students anf lecturers towards self access English language learning (SAELL) approach and programme: a case study (PhD thesis). United Kingdom: The University of Reading.

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (n.d.). Qualitative Analysis of Content.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v3i3.11121

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @ Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.

View My Stats