Examining the effect of Readtheory on EFL students’ reading proficiency

Endang Setyaningsih

Abstract


Read theory has been used by over 14,000,000 users but little is known about the effect of Readtheory on students’ reading proficiency. This study examines the use of Readtheory in an EFL Reading class. It involved 72 first-year EFL university students in Indonesia. To measure the baseline and the end line, a free android-based app called EnglishScore was utilized. Readtheory exercises were conducted in one semester as an outclass activity, embed in a regular reading course. The Readtheory program report that consists of text Lexile level progress, the grade level progress, and the ELA standards (key ideas and details, craft and structure, and integration of knowledge) were analyzed to take a deeper dive into students’ comprehension levels. As an online resource that is also commonly linked to ER programs, this study also took a survey on the degree of enjoyment that students feel during the Readtheory program. The results of the data analysis show that Readtheory increased not only students’ general reading proficiency but also grammar, vocabulary, and listening proficiency. At the micro-level, the comprehension level of the students on key ideas and details, craft and structure, and integration of knowledge were presented. The students also reported their enjoyment in three out of four dimensions that were asked in the questionnaire. The study implied that extending reading practices beyond the classroom is beneficial and free online resources which offer ease of monitoring should be endorsed and be made as part of school policy or curriculum.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P.D., Paris, S.G. (2008). “Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies” The Reading Teacher, Vol 61 (5) pp. 364-373. DOI:10.1598/RT.61.5.1

Chen, Yingzhao. (2020). “Comparing Incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and reading-while-listening.” System. Vol.97. April 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102442

Connor, C.M., and Al’Otaiba, S. (2008). Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. pp. 235-247.

Day, R. and Bamford J. (2002). “Top ten principles for extensive reading” Reading in a Foreign Language, Vol, 14 (2). Retrieved from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2002/day/day.html on 1 January, 2020

Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Results from PISA 2000. OECD: ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press

____________. (2004). The power of reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann and Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

_______________ (2020a). “Self-Selected Fiction: The Path to Academic Success?” CATESOL Newsletter, April, 2020, pp. 1-2.”

___________(2020b). Aesthetic reading: Efficient Enough”. Journal of English Language Teaching 62 (2): 3-4. 2020.

. Endang Setyaningsih / PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching),

(1) (2021) 81-93

McLean, S, and Rouault. G. (2017). “The effectiveness and efficiency of extensive reading at developing reading rates. System, 70 (92), pp. 92-106

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd edition). California: SAGE Publication

Nation, P. and Waring, R. (1997). “Vocabulary size, text coverage, and world list” In Schmitt, N. and M. McCarthy (Eds.): Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Park, J. (2016). “Integrating reading and writing through extensive reading.” ELT Journal 70 (3) pp. 287-295

Pigada, M. and Scmitt, N. (2006). “Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study” Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1). Retrieved from https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2006/pigada/pigada.html on Sept 1 in Sept. 2020

Renandya, W.A. (2016). “What can teachers do to improve students’ English language proficiency?” Proceedings 2016 Malaysia International Conference on English Language Teaching Conference, Perak, Malaysia. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3283.3684.

Suk, N. (2016). “The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition.” Reading Research Quarterly, 52 (1) pp. 73-89

Tempest, C. (2018). “Implementation of ReadTheory in a university EFL context” OnCue Journal. Vol.. 11(1),pp.81-91

Wang, Y-H. “Incidental vocabulary learning through extensive reading: A case of lower-level EFL Taiwanese learners”. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 10(3) pp. 59-80

Wilhem, J.D. (2017). “The benefits of reading for pleasure”. Edutopia. Available in https://www.edutopia.org/article/benefits-reading-pleasure#:~:text=Pleasure%20reading%20can%20be%20defined,continue%20after%20it%20is%20assigned.&text=In%20our%20study%2C%20we%20found,is%20lost%20in%20a%20book.on . Accessed on January, 10, 2021




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v6i1.12496

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @2024 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.