Konsepsi Gratifikasi sebagai Korupsi bagi Pejabat Publik

Irvan Sebastian Iskandar

Abstract


Gratification is an act that is as dangerous as bribery, however, this act is still tolerated in the social life of Indonesian society in general. Data compiled from the Corruption Eradication Commission shows that the number of gratification reports in total value has continued to increase over the past five years. During this time, many public officials have not escaped criminal charges and fines for accepting them. Unlike bribery, this act is carried out at the end when the service has been completed without prior agreement on the value of the material given. As its gray area, gratuities are used as a means of maintaining and obtaining a social relationship, access, and fostering good networks when living in society. By using a qualitative method through a literature review, this research tries to explain gratuity as an act of corruption, the difference between gratuities that are considered bribes and those that are not considered bribes. The results are, first, that gratuities do indeed fall into a form of cheating in the type of corruption acts. Second, there is a difference between gratuities and bribes, although some gratuities can be considered bribes and some are not considered bribes.

Keywords


gratification, fraud, corruption, bribery.

References


Buku

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methos approaches (5th ed.), London: Sage publications.

Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengembangan KPK. (2019). Kajian Implementasi Pasal Gratifikasi Dalam Putusan Pengadilan (Eds Revisi). Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Direktorat Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat KPK. (2016). Managing Gift. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Dion, M. (2017). The Impact of Disguised Bribes À Distorting the Basic Functions of Gift Giving Practices. Assländer, M. S., & Hudson, S. (Eds.). The Handbook of Business and Corruption: Cross-Sectoral Experiences, pp 71 93. Emerald Group Publishing.

Manual, A. F. E. (2011). International Edition. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Gabrielian, V., Yang, K., & Spice, S. (2008). Qualitative research methods. Miller, Gerald J., & Yang, K., Editor (Eds). Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration (2nd ed., 141-168). New York: CRC Press.

Artikel Jurnal Akbar, S. (2016). Gratifikasi Seksual Sebagai Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(3), 485 500. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v4i3.378

Arsjad, M. (2021). Gratifikasi Pelayanan Seksual Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Akta Yudisia, (1), 296567.https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v3i1.988

Chang, C. S., Chang, N. J., & Freese, B. T. (2001). Offering gifts or offering bribes? Code of ethics in South Korea. Journal of Third World Studies, 18(1), 125 139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45193911

Dwimawanti, I. H., & Ramadani, N. (2023). The Fraud Diamond of Public Service in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 503 515. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13569

D’Souza, C. (2003). An inference of gift giving within Asian business culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 15(1/2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850310765051

Hariyani, H. F., Priyarsono, D. S., & Asmara, A. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi korupsi di kawasan Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, (2), 32 44. https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.5.2.2016.32-44

Ikhwan, M. (2022). Comparison of Sexual Gratification in Corruption Crimes in Perspective of Legislation in Indonesia and Singapore: Perbandingan Gratifikasi Seksual Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia dan Singapura. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, (1),17 24.http://ejournal.undhari.ac.id/index.php/jah

Iskandar, I. S., & Kurniawan, T. (2020). Gratifikasi di Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasarkan Motif Kecurangan: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(2), 81 97. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i2.7690

Kasiyanto, A., & Jatmikowati, S. W. (2023). THE EFFORTS OF PREVENTING BRIBERY AND GRATIFICATION AT THE LAND OFFICE. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 8(1), 50 62. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i1.165

Mapuasari, S. A., & Mahmudah, H. (2018). Korupsi Berjamaah: Konsensus Sosial atas Gratifikasi dan Suap. Integritas, 4(2), 159 176. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.279

Maradona, T. B. (2021). Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Budaya Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(1), 26 39. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v9i1.52526

Marliana, M., & Marini, H. (2022). SATU DEKADE GRATIFIKASI DI INDONESIA (2010-2019). JIPAGS (Journal of Indonesian Public Administration and Governance Studies), (1).http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jipags.v6il.1266

Osborne, Denis. (2013). An exploration of extortion. Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 20 Iss 2 pp. 163 – 185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13590791311322355

Ruyadi, Y., Syarif, E., & Sofyan, I. (2016). Gratifikasi dan Pelayanan Sipil: Suatu Fenomena Sosial dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. SOSIETAS, (1). https://doi.org/10.17509/sosietas.v6i1.2865

Santoso, T. (2013). Menguak relevansi ketentuan gratifikasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(3), 402 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.3.246

Suryanto, A. F. B. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Menyuap Dan Gratifikasi Di Indonesia. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(2), 4. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/is2/4

Tahir, A., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2021). Bribery and Gratuity: Regulatory Analysis and Judicial Response. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, (2), 267 380. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.4093

Tesis dan Makalah

Iskandar, Irvan Sebastian. (2020). Analisis Gratifikasi Melalui Pendekatan Motif Kecurangan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Studi Kasus Pada Bank X). Tesis, Program Studi Magister Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Jessica. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Batasan Nilai Atas Gratifikasi dan Pelaksanaan Lelang Pada Barang Hasil Gratifikasi. Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Chazawi, Adami. (2014). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menerima Gratifikasi & Pembuktiannya: Pasal 12B jo 12C UU No.20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan atas UU No.31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Dipresentasikan dalam Rangka Penyusunan Anotasi Hukum untuk Penguatan Pasal Gratifikasi Kasus Gayus Tambunan dan Dhana Widyatmika. Jakarta

Peraturan dan Perundang-undangan

Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang No. 20 tahun 2001 Tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang No. 11 tahun 1980 Tentang Tindak Pidana Suap.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jap.v14i2.21863

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Administrasi Publik

Jurnal Administrasi Publik site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA

 JAP, Jurnal Administrasi Publik. Journal is published by Laboratorium Administrasi Publik FISIP Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa (print) and Jurnal Untirta (eprint).

Publisher Address: Jalan Raya Palka Km 3, Sindangsari, Pabuaran, Kabupaten Serang, Banten 42163, Indonesia. Telepon: Telp: (0254) 280330 ext. 228, Email: jap@untirta.ac.id | Click to access: Jurnal Administrasi Publik

 

ISSN 2087-8923 | e-ISSN 2549-9319

Published by Jurnal Untirta, part of the Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

 

 

Klik disini untuk melihat Grafik Stat Counter: