Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is scientific periodical publication on agribusiness and rural development issue as a media for information dissemination of research result for lecturer, researcher and practitioner. The journal publishes several topics:

  • Agricultural economics
  • Business and entrepreneurship
  • Agricultural extension & communication


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The suitability of manuscripts for publication Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is judged by peer reviewers and editorial board. All the review process are conducted in double blind review. Editor in Chief handles all correspondence with the author and makes the final decision as to whether the paper is recommended for acceptance, rejection, or needs to be returned to the author for revision.

Editor in Chief and Editorial Board will evaluate the submitted papers on praqualification step for suitability of further review process. The manuscripts will be evaluated by two qualified peer reviewers selected by Editor in Chief. The peer reviewers should examine the manuscript and return it with their recommendation to the Editor in Chief as soon as possible, usually within 2 weeks. The Editor in Chief decide the acceptance or rejection of the paper.

Papers needing revision will be returned to the authors, and the author must return the revised manuscript to the Editor in Chief via OJS of Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu. Editor in Chief sends the revised manuscript to Editorial Board to check whether the manuscript is revised as suggested by peer reviewers. Editorial Board could give recommendation to Editor in Chief that the manuscript should return to authors, accept, or reject within 1 weeks. Editor in Chief would send an acceptance letter announcing the publication issue attached with manuscript reprint to authors. 




Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



open acsess



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is a peer-reviewed e-journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor in chief, the editor, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa)

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed of Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa as publisher of Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Author Guidelines

Download Manuscript Template (PDF)


Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu is scientific periodical publication on agribusiness and rural development issue as a media for information dissemination of research result for lecturer, researcher and practitioner. The journal only encompasses research and scientific analysis articles in the field of agribusiness including (not limited to): agricultural economics, marketing management, consumer behavior, community empowerment, agricultural communication, human resources, economics of halal food, sharia finance, agricultural policy, and international trade.

The article which sent to the Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu should be original work, i.e. the same article must have not been published or accepted for publication in any other journals/ books either in full or substantial part; and must not be submitted to any other journal forconcurrent publication or being considered for publication or even being reviewed. Articles submitted to the Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu could be written in Bahasa Indonesia or English.


  1. Manuscripts written in Indonesian or English with parts and sequences: Title, Author Name, Abstract, Introduction, Methods of Research, Results and Discussion, Conclusions and Suggestions, Acknowledgments (if any), References.
  2. The articles are typed neatly by using a document processing program, sent in soft copy extension * .doc / *. Docx, to an email address. The font type used is Time New Roman 12. The length of the article is at least 15 and 20 pages including tables and drawings, without attachments, A4 paper size, one typed face, one half spacing, typing requirements of the edge of the paper each 3 cm from the top, down, right and 4 cm from the left.
  3. The title is written in Indonesian or English briefly and describes the content (not more than 20 words). Written in capital letters of Times New Roman 14, bold, centered with size 13, space 1.5.
  4. The author's name (without title) comes with the name and address of the agency, telephone, fax, and e-mail. Written in Time New Roman, italic, size 11, followed by study program and university / institution for shelter and email address.
  5. Abstract is written mean in Indonesian and English which summarized the purpose of research, research method, research result and conclusion, consist of 150-250 words along with keyword or keyword and italic written on the size of letter 11. Followed by keyword last and separate rows, no more than 5 alphabetically arranged words. Written jutted into the shape of Times New Roman letters 11, italics.
  6. Articles written in Indonesian or English are good and correct. The length of the image and the photograph should be in finished form with sufficient image resolution (clear and comfortable views), as well as a natural size corresponding to the format of a scientific journal.
  7. Bibliography refers at least 3 latest libraries with the latest library age of maximum 5 (five) years.
  8. The bibliography is written alphabetically, in accordance with the last name (without an academic degree), not writing the last name or author's name and publishing year, eg Budiaji, 2009 or Budiaji (2009), Krisdianto et al. (2009) or (Krisdianto et al. , 2009), (Krisdianto et al., 2009). Quotation The secondary literature is written with the author's name and the primary and secondary library publishing years, eg Aliudin (2005) in Meutia (2009).
  9. The author lists the institution of origin and complete correspondence address. Writers whose articles are published will get 1 exemplar scientific journals.
  10. Certainty of article loading or rejection will be dismissed via email. Articles not loaded will be returned. The editors of scientific journals have the right to edit.
  11. Journal delivery fee from outside is set at Rp. 200.000 /author. In-house printing costs are set at Rp. 150.000 /author.