Key success factors for lean six sigma implementation on Light Rail Transit Station construction project

Ulfa Soraya, Albert Eddy Husin, Bernadette Detty Kussumardianadewi, I Putu Indra Prabawa

Abstract


Transportation is essentially designed to meet the requirements of the movement or movement of a person or an item from one place to another. Transportation has an important role and strategy in achieving goals, including recognizing that transportation is a method of facilitating the wheels of the economy and strengthening unity and integrity in national development. Transportation has an important role and strategy in achieving goals, including recognizing that transportation is a method of facilitating the wheels of the economy and strengthening unity and integrity in national development. In the implementation of the LRT Station construction project, good the timeliness, cost, and quality of a project's overall completion are all influenced by scheduling and quality control. Project delays are common in the process of implementing construction projects. This as a result, the quality is low and does not meet technical criteria. At long last, it caused a project's failure. This study analyzes the key success factor for lean six sigma implementation on Light Rail Transit Station Construction Project. The conclusion of this study is that there is a significant key success factor for lean six sigma implementation on Light Rail Transit Station Construction Project. Based on the outcomes, of the study, ten (10) factors that affect cost performance using Lean Six Sigma include: cost reduction, evaluating quality, ceiling, productivity, waste management, lack of leadership understanding of the project, drawing, design changes, defect rate in work process, variability reduction. The control phase is carried out by the coordinator each division to reduce or eliminate errors in construction application. Control work is carried out regularly and in an organized manner.

 

Transportasi pada hakikatnya dimaksudkan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan memindahkan atau memindahkan seseorang atau benda dari satu tempat ke tempat lain. Transportasi memiliki peran dan strategi penting untuk mencapai tujuan, termasuk dalam pembangunan negara. Dalam pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan Stasiun LRT, baik ketepatan waktu, biaya, dan kualitas penyelesaian suatu proyek secara keseluruhan dipengaruhi oleh penjadwalan dan pengendalian mutu. Keterlambatan proyek sering terjadi dalam proses pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi. Akibatnya, kualitasnya rendah dan tidak memenuhi kriteria teknis. Akhirnya, itu menyebabkan kerugian proyek. Studi ini menganalisis faktor kunci sukses dalam proyek Lean Six Sigma di LRT. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat key success factor yang signifikan dari Lean Six Sigma pada stasiun LRT. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan 10 faktor mempengaruhi kinerja biaya Lean Six Sigma meliputi: pengurangan biaya, evaluasi kualitas, plafon, produktivitas, pengelolaan limbah, Kurangnya pemahaman kepemimpinan proyek, gambar, perubahan desain, tingkat cacat dalam proses kerja, dan pengurangan variabilitas. Tahap pengendalian dilakukan oleh koordinator masing-masing divisi untuk mengurangi atau menghilangkan kesalahan dalam aplikasi konstruksi. Pekerjaan pengendalian dilakukan secara teratur dan terorganisir.


Keywords


Key success factors, lean six sigma, LRT station.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sianipar, A. (2020). Kajian preferensi masyarakat dalam menggunakan LRT Jabodebek. J. Penelit. Transp. Darat, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–20, doi: 10.25104/jptd.v21i1.962.

Bernardes, C., Russo, P., Carvalho, D., Saiote, J., Ramos, J. (2016). Safety profile of anti-TNF alpha therapy in the elderly-a comparative study. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J., vol. 4, no. 5, p. A456, https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640616663689.

Kulsum, K., Rahman, R. F., & Febianti, E. (2021). Identification and proposed strategy for minimizing defects using the lean six sigma method in the pallet production process. Tek. J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 89, doi: 10.36055/tjst.v17i1.10942.

Gaspersz, J. (2011). Compete with creativity. SSRN Electron. J., doi: 10.2139/ssrn.983934.

Syafrimaini & Husin, A. E. (2021). Implementation of lean six sigma method in high-rise residential building projects. Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1228–1236, doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090424.

Ali, A., Amin, M., & Husin, A. E. (2019). Key success factors for safety programs implementation in Indonesian construction projects. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1385–1394, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36301.49127.

Basto, M., & Pereira, J. M. (2012). An SPSS R-menu for ordinal factor analysis. J. Stat. Softw., vol. 46, no. 4, doi: 10.18637/jss.v046.i04.

Husin, A. E., & Sustiawan, F. (2021). Analisa RII (Relative Important Index) terhadap faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh dalam mengimplementasikan BIM 4D dan M-PERT pada pekerjaan struktur bangunan hunian bertingkat tinggi. J. Apl. Tek. Sipil, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 417, doi: 10.12962/j2579-891x.v19i4.9336.

Wong, K. K. K.-K. (2013). 28/05 - Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using smart PLS. Mark. Bull., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–32, [Online]. Available: http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/v24/mb_v24_t1_wong.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ken_Wong10/publication/268449353_Partial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equation_Modeling_(PLS-SEM)_Techniques_Using_SmartPLS/links/54773b1b0cf293e2da25e3f3.pdf

Leśniak, A., Wieczorek, D., & Górka, M. (2020). Costs of facade systems execution. Arch. Civ. Eng., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 81–95, doi: 10.24425/ace.2020.131776.

Husin, A. E., & Budianto, E. A. (2022). Influential factors in the application of the Lean Six Sigma and time-cost trade-off method in the construction of the ammunition warehouse. Sinergi, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 81, doi: 10.22441/sinergi.2022.1.011.

Husin, A. E., Setyawan, T. L., Meidiyanto, H., Kussumardianadewi, B. D., & Eddy Husin, M. K. (2019). Key success factors implementing BIM based quantity take-off in fit-out office work using relative importance index. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 986–990, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.F82650.88619.

Abdillah, C. F., Husin, A. E., & Husin, M. K. E. (2020). Key success factor of building information modeling (BIM) quantity take off implementation on lrt station concourse project cost performance improvement. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30326.01605.

Lu, W. & Yuan, H. (2010). Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 201–208, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.010.

Jeyaraman, K. & Teo, L. K. (2010). A conceptual framework for critical success factors of lean Six Sigma: Implementation on the performance of electronic manufacturing service industry. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 191–215, doi: 10.1108/20401461011075008.

Wang, J., Yuan, H., Kang, X., & Lu, W. (2010). Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: A china study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 931–936, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.012.

Ozorhon, B., & Cinar, E. (2015). Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning implementation in construction: Case of Turkey. J. Manag. Eng., vol. 31, no. 6, p. 04015014, doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000370.

Abu Bakar, F. A., Subari, K., & Mohd Daril, M. A. (2015). Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma deployment: a current review. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 339–348, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2015-0011.

de M. Nascimento, D. L., Goncalvez Quelhas, O. L., Gusmão Caiado, R. G., Tortorella, G. L., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Rocha-Lona, L. (2020). A lean six sigma framework for continuous and incremental improvement in the oil and gas sector. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 577–595, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-02-2019-0011.

Samarghandi, H., Tabatabaei, S. M. M., Taabayan, P., Hashemi, A. M., & Willoughby, K. (2016). Studying the reasons for delay and cost overrun in construction projects: The case of Iran. J. Constr. Dev. Ctries., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–84, doi: 10.21315/jcdc2016.21.1.4.

Tileng, K. G. (2015). Penerapan technology acceptance model pada aplikasi Edmodo di Universitas Ciputra Surabaya menggunakan analisis jalur. Juisi, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 28–37.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/tjst.v18i1.15632

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Teknika: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Teknika: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.