The influence of treatment on cold work tool steel SKD 11 with temperature variations on mechanical properties

Indah Uswatun Hasanah, Dedi Priadi, Donanta Dhaneswara, A. Ali Alhamidi

Abstract


SKD 11 steel is a type of cold work tool steel that is popular and widely used in the manufacturing industry. SKD 11 steel is generally applied as dies, molds, cutting tools or others. Because of these applications. SKD 11 steel must have good wear resistance, hardness, dimensional stability, and toughness. So to improve the characteristics of the steel, a heat treatment process is carried out, but due to the high carbon content and alloying elements in the tool steel, the martensite finish (Mf) temperature of the steel becomes lower, so after the heat treatment process, usually the steel still leaves a lot of austenite phase. or commonly known as residual austenite. Residual austenite can affect the mechanical properties of SKD 11 steel, residual austenite can be removed by carrying out a cryogenic treatment process, this process is carried out after the quenching process. The heat treatment process this time was carried out using a vacuum furnace using an austenite temperature of 1040℃ and quenching using a medium in the form of nitrogen gas with a pressure of 3 bar. The cryogenic treatment process that was carried out afterward was carried out by varying the temperature of -80℃, -110℃, and -140℃. The test results obtained were then analyzed using an optical microscope and XRD (X-ray diffraction), as well as hardness testing and impact testing to determine the mechanical properties of the steel. Based on the research results it is known that the resulting microstructure contains martensite matrix and carbide M7C3 as primary carbide and M23C6 as secondary carbide, then by carrying out the cryogenic treatment process can reduce the percent of residual austenite, the lowest percent of residual austenite is obtained from the results of the cryogenic treatment at -140℃, which is equal to 1.15%. This is directly proportional to the hardness test results obtained, where the highest hardness value was also obtained by the sample with a value of 61.5 HRC, while the relationship with toughness is inversely proportional. The higher the hardness, the lower the resulting toughness.
 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Deirmina, F., Peghini, N., Almangour, B., Grzesiak, D., & Pellizzari, M. (2019). Heat treatment and properties of a hot work tool steel fabricated by additive manufacturing. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 753: p. 109-121.

Balaško, T., Voncina, M., Burja, J., Batic, B., S. & Medved, J. (2021). High-temperature oxidation behaviour of AISI H11 tool steel. Metals,11(5): p. 758.

Sverdrup, H., & Olafsdottir, A. (2019). Assessing the long-term global sustainability of the production and supply for stainless steel. BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality, 4: p. 1-29.

Duc, T.M., & Ngoc, T., B. (2020). Effectiveness of alumina nanofluid on slotting end milling performance of SKD 11 tool steel. Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME), 9(2): p. 359-369.

Demir, E., & Toktas, I. (2018). Effects of cryogenic treatment on residual stresses of AISI D2 tool steel. Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials, 56(3).

Das, D., Dey, T. K., & K.K. Ray, (2010).Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part I. Microstructure and hardness. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 527(9): p. 2182-2193.

Ďurica, J., Ptacinova, J., Domankova, M., Caplovic, L., Hrusovska, L., Malovcova, V., Jurci, P. (2019). Changes in microstructure of ledeburitic tool steel due to vacuum austenitizing and quenching, sub-zero treatments at− 140 C and tempering. Vacuum, 170: p. 108977.

Das, D., & K.K. Ray, (2012). Structure–property correlation of sub-zero treated AISI D2 steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 541: p. 45-60.

Su, Y.-Y., Chiu, L.-H., Chen, F.-S., Lin, S.-C., Pan, Y.-T., (2014). Residual stresses and dimensional changes related to the lattice parameter changes of heat-treated JIS SKD 11 tool steels. Materials Transactions, 55(5): p. 831-837.

Chowwanonthapunya, T. & Peeratatsuwan, C. (2020). An experimental investigation on the carbide precipitation and mechanical property evolution of a cryogenically treated tool steel. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 12(8): p. 123-132.

Chowwanonthapunya, T., Peeratatsuwan, C., & Rithinyo, M. (2022). Cryogenic treatment of tool steels: A brief review and a case report. Maritime Technology and Research, 4(1): p. 253445-253445.

Jurči, P., Domankova, M., Hudakova, M., Ptacinova, J., Pasak, M., & Palcek, P. (2017). Characterization of microstructure and tempering response of conventionally quenched, short-and long-time sub-zero treated PM Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel. Materials Characterization, 134: p. 398-415.

Dumasia, C. A., Kulkarni, V.A., & and Sonar, K. (2017). A review on the effect of cryogenic treatment on metals. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(7): p. 2402-2406.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/tjst.v19i1.19422

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Teknika: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Teknika: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.