Problematika Final dan Mengikat Putusan Arbitrase dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999

Hizkia Raymond

Abstract


In modern law the emergence of several settlements of a dispute outside the judiciary. One of them is the practice of arbitration, which is becoming known as a dispute resolution outside the Court, especially on business issues. The development of the form of business in Indonesia, brings other consequences for the business itself, namely the hope to be able to resolve any disputes that may arise, quickly, cheaply and in the best possible way. The implementation of Law 30 of 1999 has become the latest legal basis for dispute resolution and arbitration in Indonesia. The object of research taken in this study is only regarding arbitration in the law. What is of concern is the low legal force of the final and binding arbitration award which is the background for holding the arbitration. An example is clearly stated in article 72, where in the explanation expressis verbis explains the problem of the arbitral award. In conducting this research, the author uses a normative juridical research method, using a literature study. The results of this study indicate that there are problems in the law, especially in the final and binding diction. The suggestions that can be proposed to the authorized institution are to immediately issue rules or guidelines for the solution of these problems.


Keywords


Problems, Final-Binding, Arbitration

Full Text:

55-68 PDF

References


Agustina, Rani Sri. “THE CREDIT RESTRUCTURING AS A FORM OF PROTECTION AGAINST CUSTOMERS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 2 (2021): 231. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17528.

Andryan. “Implikasi Putusan Hak Uji Materiil di Mahkamah Agung terhadap Legalitas pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 03 (2018).

Ardiansyah, Farangga Harki, Alfitra, dan Tresia Elda. “Upaya Hukum Peninjuan Kembali Dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 118/PK/Pdt/2018.” Journal of Legal Research 02, no. 02 (2020).

Atmadja, Dewa Gede. “Asas-asas hukum dalam Sistem hukum.” Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana 12, no. 02 (2018). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/kw.12.2.721.145-155.

Basri, Hasan. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 02, no. 02 (2021).

Dasco Ahmad, Sufmi. “www.ijres.org Volume 6 Issue 8 Ver. I ǁ.” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES) ISSN, 2018.

Dewi, Arum Afriani. “Arbitrase Online Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Pandemi Covid 19.” Legal Reasoning 3, no. 2 (2021).

Farahni, Fadilah Nariza. “The Brankcruptcy Of foregin Capital Companies and Indonesian Labour Protection.” Jurnal hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 03, no. 01 (2020). https://doi.org/.

Harahap, Panusunan. “Eksekutabilitas Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Lembaga Peradilan.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 7, no. 1 (2018).

Ilyas, Adam. “Praktik Penerapan Exclusionary Rules di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 50, no. 01 (2021).

Julyano, Mario, dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas kepastian hukum melalui konstruksi penalaran Positivisme hukum.” Jurnal Crepido 01, no. 01 (2019).

Kadir, Abdul. “Relevansi Alat bukti Informasi Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 06, no. 02 (2018).

Kurniati. “Peluang dan Kendala Pengembangan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Journal Doctrinal 4, no. 1 (2019).

Meutia, Pityani. “Pembatasan Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Perdata Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 108/PUU-XIV/2016.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 02 (2019).

Mumbunan, Rendi Renaldi. “Upaya Hukum Biasa dan Luar Biasa Terhadap putusan Hakim Dalam perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen VII, no. 10 (2018).

Muskibah. “Arbitrase Sebagai alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 04, no. 02 (2018).

Nopiandra, Kikin. “PERAN LEMBAGA ARBITRASE DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS INTERNASIONAL: TINJAUAN DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI SISTEM HUKUM.” Journal Legal Reasoning 01, no. 01 (2018).

Palmawati Tahir., Muhamad Muslih., dan Rani Sri Agustina. “MUI HALAL CERTIFICATION ON MILKFISH SATAY AS AN EFFORT TO SUPPORT NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY.” LEGAL STANDING JURNAL ILMU HUKUM 4, no. 1 (2020): 233–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ls.v4i1.2670.

Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. “Penetapan Waktu Pelaksanaan Banding Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pada Daerah Karakteristik Wilayah Kepulauan.” Jurnal SASI 24, no. 02 (2018).

Riesta Dewi, Lia. “Implikasi Hukum Lokasi Pusat Pemerintahan Kabupaten Serang Yang Berada Pada Dua Kecamatan Berbeda.” Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i1.11471.

Sari, Indah. “Keunggulan Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 09, no. 02 (2019).

Situmorang, Mosgan. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 17, no. 04 (2017).

Sukendar, Astria Yuli Satyarini, Amanda Raissa, dan Tomy Michael. “Penjualan Rogodi (Roti Goreng Mulyodadi) sebagai usaha bisnis dalam meningkatkan usaha mikro kecil (UMK) di Desa Mulyodadi, Kabupaten Sidoarjo.” Jurnal hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 03, no. 01 (2020).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i2.12672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum

EDITORIAL ADDRESS

Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Raya Palka KM. 03 Sindangsari Pabuaran Kab. Serang
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence
E-mail  : sultan.jurisprudence@untirta.ac.id 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.