The Effective Role of BPSK in Resolving Consumer Disputes in Accordance with UUPK: Legal and Theoretical Perspectives

Bernadeth Gisela Lema Udjan, Ariyanto Hermawan

Abstract


The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MARI) canceled the decision issued by BPSK, this shows that the legal regulation regarding BPSK, especially the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) is not firm in providing a rule in resolving consumer disputes. The research aims to critically analyze the role of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes in terms of the theory of legislation based on the UUPK. The type of research conducted in this study is juridical-normative by examining library materials or secondary data. In order to analyze the research to be conducted and answer the formulation of the problem, the author takes a case approach that shows the incompatibility of the rules regarding BPSK. The results of this research show that there are discrepancies in UUPK in regulating BPSK. In the UUPK, it has been emphasized that BPSK's decision is final and binding so that no objection can be filed to the District Court. Not only that, BPSK is seen as a quasi-court institution, which means that BPSK's position is equal to that of a general court. This can be seen from the duties and authorities that have been regulated in the legislation. The results of this research are expected to serve as a reference or guideline as well as to contribute to the government on the UUPK in affirming a legislation to resolve consumer disputes through BPSK so that the role of BPSK becomes more important.

Keywords


UUPK, BPSK, verdict, role, dispute resolution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

Berry, Michael Frans. “PEMBENTUKAN TEORI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN.” Muhammadiyah Law Review 2, no. 2 (2018). http://ojs.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/law.

Effendi, Zulham, Selamat Lumban Gaol, and Nurlely Darwis. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Quasi Yudisial Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial, Dan Sains 12, no. 2 (2023).

https://doi.org/0.19109/intelektualita.v12i2.18848.

Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2010.

Farida, Maria. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Haryani, Anik Tri, Sarjiyati, Yuni Purwati, and Mochamad Juli Pudjiono. “Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Konsumen.” YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6, no. 2 (2020). http://yustisia.unmermadiun.ac.id/index.php/yustisia.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2016.

Marbun, N., and P. Pahlefi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Pembentukan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Kota Jambi.” Zaaken Journal of Civil and Bussiness Law 2 (2021): 96–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v2i1.11897.

Nasution, Az. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Diadit Media, 2001.

Nisantika, Riris, and Ni Luh Putu Egi Santika Maharani. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Oleh Badan Penyelesaian SengketaKonsumen (BPSK).” Jurnal Locus Delicti 2, no. 1 (2021). https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JLD.

Perdana, Rifki Putra, Fuad, and Said Munawar. “Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Yogyakarta.” WIDYA PRANATA HUKUM 3, no. 2 (2021).

Prayuti, Yuyut. “Urgensi Pembaruan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dengan Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Akses Terhadap Keadilan Bagi Konsumen.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i2.433.

Rhiti, Hyronimus. Filsafat Hukum Edisi Lengkap Dari Klasik Sampai Postmodernisme. 5th ed. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2015.

Santoso, M. A. Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Saputra, Andi. “Tok! 127 Keputusan Sengketa Konsumen Dianulir MA.” DetikNews. 2017. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3669668/tok-127-keputusan-sengketa-konsumen-dianulir-ma, Diakses pada tanggal 7 Maret 2024.

Sidharta. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2004.

Sitepu, Rida Ista, and Hana Muhamad. “Efektifitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk) Sebagai Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia.” JURNAL RECHTEN: RISETHUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA 3, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v3i2.79.

Sutedi, Adrian. Tanggungjawab Produk Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008.

Tauhiddah, Titia, Busyra Azheri, and Yussy. A Mannas. “KEWENANGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LEMBAGA PEMBIAYAAN ANTARA BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DENGAN LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (LAPS).” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 94–105.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v5i1.3472.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 06/MDAG/PER/2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang BPSK.

Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Nomor 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v4i1.24488

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum

EDITORIAL ADDRESS

Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Raya Palka KM. 03 Sindangsari Pabuaran Kab. Serang
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence
E-mail  : [email protected] 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.