Refining Land Dispute Resolution in Indonesia’s Judicial System: An Economic Analysis of Legal Integration

Rico J.R. Tambunan, Rachmad Safa`At, Iwan Permadi, Rachmi Sulistyarini

Abstract


Land dispute resolution in Indonesia is complex, involving multiple legal, social, and economic factors. Current mechanisms, including civil, administrative courts, and alternative methods like mediation, often fail to provide efficient or reliable outcomes, leading to legal uncertainty. This research examines the integration of dispute resolution mechanisms into Indonesia's judicial system from an economic analysis of law perspective. By applying principles of economic efficiency, the study explores how integration can reduce transaction costs and accelerate resolution processes. Using qualitative methods, the research analyzes legal documents, regulations, and court decisions to identify systemic challenges and propose improvements. The findings suggest that incorporating economic efficiency into the judicial process could enhance legal clarity, overcome existing obstacles, and restore public trust in land dispute resolution. This study contributes to the ongoing reform of Indonesia's legal system, offering insights into more effective, cost-efficient approaches to dispute resolution


Keywords


Land Dispute Resolution; Legal Efficiency; Judicial Integration

References


Ahmad Mujahidin, Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia, (Bandung:Refika Aditama, 2007).

Amartya Sen, Fragmentation in Property Rights and Its Economic Consequences, Economic Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 58, No. 4, 2019.

Arsil Dkk, Kerta Kebijakan Penguranan Arus Perkara Ke Mahkamah Agung,( Jakarta: LeIP, 2017)

Benjamin Means, E-Courts and Land Dispute Resolution: A Technological Leap Forward, Legal Technology Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2021.

David Kennedy, Specialization in Judicial Systems: Evidence from Property Disputes, Journal of Comparative Law and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2020.

Dimitri Lorenzani dan Federico Lucidi, The Economic Impact of civil Justice Reform, (Belgium: European Commision, 2014).

Elinor Ostrom, Designing Effective Dispute Resolution Systems for Resource Conflicts, Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2020.

Guido Calabresi, Procedural Inefficiencies and Their Economic Costs, Journal of Legal Efficiency Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2022.

Gunawan Wiradi, Reforma Agraria: Perjalanan, Konsep, dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Insist Press, 2019).

Hendro Saputro, "Dualisme Hukum dalam Sengketa Tanah: Analisis terhadap Sistem Hukum Nasional dan Adat," Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2019.

Hernando De Soto, Transaction Costs and Land Governance: A Framework for Reform, Global Property Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2022.

Jane Holder, Administrative and Judicial Integration in Land Dispute Systems, Journal of Administrative Law Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2021.

John G. Sprankling, Legal Ambiguities in Land Dispute Resolution, Property Law Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2019.

Konsorsium Pembaharuan Agraria, Laporan Tahunan Agraria 2023 Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria , Dekade Krisis Agraria: Warisan Nawacita dan Masa Depan Reforma Agraria Pasca Perubahan Politik 2024, Konsorsium Pembaharuan Agraria, 2023.

Maria SW Sumardjono, Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya, (Jakarta: Kompas, 2017).

Masalah disparitas putusan pengadilan sudah menjadi masalah lama dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia, ditahun 2009, Mahkamah Agung pernah menerbitkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung RI, Nomor 14 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pembinaan Personil Hakim yang memerintahkan para Ketua Pengadilan Tingkat Banding hendaknya menjaga terjadinya disparitas putusan. Dalam Cetak biru pembaharuan peradilan MA 2010-2035 isu disparitas putusan pengadilan yang tidak bertanggung jawab menjadi salah satu isu yang menjadi dasar reformasi sistem pengadilan di Mahkamah Agung dan Badan Peradilan di bawahnya.

Melissa Brown, Customary Law and Formal Justice Systems: Bridging the Divide, Journal of Legal Pluralism, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2020.

Michael Trebilcock dan Ronald J. Daniels, ADR Integration in Judicial Systems: Lessons from Comparative Jurisdictions, Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2019.

Mudjiono, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Indonesia Melalui Revitalisasi Fungsi Badan Peradilan, Jurnal Hukum NO. 3 VOL.14 JULI 2007.

Pasal 24 ayat (1) Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Patrick McAuslan, Specialized Land Courts: A Global Perspective, International Journal of Property Law, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2020.

Rachelle Alterman, Specialized Courts for Land Disputes: Lessons from Comparative Jurisdictions, Journal of Land Use and Development Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2020.

Rachmad Safa’at dan Indah Dwi Qurbani, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertambangan (Studi di Kabupaten Lumajang Provinsi Jawa Timur)”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 1, Maret 2017.

Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law, 10th Edition (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2020).

Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law: A Legal and Economic Perspective, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 132, No. 1, 2021.

Sally Engle Merry, Integrating Legal Pluralism in Land Dispute Systems, Law and Society Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2021.

Steven Shavell, Economic Efficiency and Legal Systems: A Framework for Reform, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2022.

Steven Shavell, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).

Yosef Aditya, "Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pertanahan di Indonesia," Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2022.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v8i1.30991

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Nurani Hukum

EDITORIAL ADDRESS

Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Raya Palka KM. 03 Sindangsari Pabuaran Kab. Serang    
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk
E-mail  : [email protected] 

 OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.