The Implication of SEMA No 2/2023 on the Protection of Administrative Rights in Interfaith Marriage
Abstract
Interfaith marriage is an inevitable phenomenon in pluralistic societies like Indonesia. Although the Marriage Law does not explicitly prohibit it, the Law on Population Administration provides legal space for interfaith couples to register their marriage through a court ruling. In response to this, the Supreme Court issued SEMA No 2/2023 as a guideline for judges in adjudicating cases related to the registration of marriages between individuals of different religions and beliefs. This study aims to understand the background and objectives of the issuance of this Circular Letter, as well as its implementation regarding the protection of the administrative rights of interfaith couples at the Surakarta District Court. The research employs a field research method with an empirical juridical approach, with data obtained through interviews with three judges. The findings reveal that SEMA No 2/2023 is used as a legal basis by judges in deciding cases related to the registration of interfaith marriages, in order to ensure consistency and legal certainty. The views of the judges at the Surakarta District Court indicate that SEMA No 2/2023 is positioned as a legal guide in assessing applications for the registration of interfaith marriages. Despite receiving criticism, the Circular has been met with a positive response from the judges. In conclusion, SEMA No 2/2023 affirms that the validity of a marriage is recognized solely based on religious law and highlights the importance of adhering to legal provisions to safeguard the administrative rights of interfaith couples.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Mahadi, Faisal Sarifudin, Mochammad Rizky Maulana, dan Dian Latifiani. “ANALISIS PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI KOTA SEMARANG: SEBUAH TELAAH SETELAH DIKELUARKANNYA SEMA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2023” 1, no. 4 (2023).
Agustin, Fitria. “Kedudukan Anak dari Perkawinan Berbeda Agama menurut Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (20 Juli 2018): 43. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i1.574.
Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.” Media Syari’ah 22, no. 1 (6 Mei 2020): 48. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719.
Asiah, Nur. “KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN HUKUM ISLAM” 10, no. 2 (2015).
Asmara, Yuda. “Kedudukan SEMA Terhadap Suatu Undang-Undang.” Hukum Online.com, 8 November 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kedudukan-sema-terhadap-suatu-undang-undang-lt5da3d5db300a9.
Azhari, Wildan Habib, dan Fauziah Lubis. “PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM DAN HAK AZASI MANUSIA.” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 10, No 02 (2022) (2022). https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i02.3184.
Bagus Razali, Ubed. “Mengakhiri Polemik Pencatatan Perkawinan Bedaa Agama dan Keyakinan.” Hakim Pengadilan Agama Selatpanjang, Agustus 2023.
Basuki Prasetyo, Agung. “Akibat Hukum Perkawinan Yang Tidak Dicatatkan Secara Administratif Pada Masyarakat Adat.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3, no. 1 (3 Maret 2020): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.23-34.
Cahyadi, Irwan Adi. “KEDUDUKAN SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG (SEMA) DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Mei 2014.
Farid, Diana, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Hendriana Hendriana, dan Iffah Fathiah. “Interfaith Marriage: Subjectivity of the Judge in Determination of No. 454/Pdt.p/2018 Surakarta District Court.” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (1 Desember 2022): 355. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4574.
Fidela, Putri Athaya, dan Imelda Martinelli. “KONSEP KEABSAHAN PASAL 2 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN TERHADAP PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA BERDASARKAN IZIN DARI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN,” 2023.
Gemilang, Kemas Muhammad, Hengki Firmanda, Maghfirah Maghfirah, Hellen Lastfitriani, dan Abdul Rahim Hakimi. “Discussing the Phenomenon of the Appointment of Judges in District Courts Regarding Interfaith Marriages from a Legal Logic Perspective.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 November (9 November 2023): 307. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i2.8185.
Halim, Abdul, dan Carina Rizky Ardhani. “KEABSAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DILUAR NEGERI DALAM TINJAUAN YURIDIS” 1 (2016).
Hanifah, Gina, Flavia Faza Aulia, dan Tiara Cahya Savitri. “INKONSISTENSI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DALAM MEMANDANG KEABSAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA” Vol. 5 No. 2 (Juli 2022): page 1133-1147.
Hutama Hutabarat, Dany Try, Komis Simanjuntak, dan Syahrunsyah Syarunsyah. “Pengelabuan Hukum Perkawinan Atas Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (26 Oktober 2022): 322. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5383.
Instruksi Presiden-1-1991
Interview with Aris Gunawan, 7 Desember 2023.
Interview with Dzulkarnain, 23 November 2023.
Interview with Ninik Hendras Susilowati, 14 November 2023.
Kaltim Post. “Tren Perkawinan Tidak Seagama Meningkat Setiap Tahun, MA Larang Hakim Catat Nikah Beda Agama.” 20 Juli 2023. https://kaltimpost.jawapos.com/utama/20/07/2023/tren-perkawinan-tidak-seagama-meningkat-setiap-tahun-ma-larang-hakim-catat-nikah-beda-agama.
Kharisma, Bintang Ulya. “CIRCULAR OF THE SUPREME COURT (SEMA) NUMBER 2 OF 2023, END OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGE POLEMIC?” Volume 5, no. Issue 1 (Juni 2023): 477–82.
M.Yunus, Fakhrurrazi, dan Zahratul Aini. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam).” Media Syari’ah 20, no. 2 (28 Februari 2020): 138. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v20i2.6512.
Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law.” Mazahib 21, no. 2 (27 Desember 2022): 155–86. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.5436.
Peran Mahkamah Agung Dalam Pengembangan Hukum Keluarga Islam (Islamic Family Law) di Era Digital. The 1st International Conference on Islamic Family Law of ADHKI (ICoIFL). Yogyakarta, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLIxFc5m9y0.
Pristiwiyanto, Pristiwiyanto. “Fungsi Pencatatan Perkawinan Dan Implikasi Hukumnya.” Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam 11, no. 1 (2 November 2019): 34–52. https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v11i1.33.
Purwanto, Gunawan Hadi. “Penetapan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif” 12 (2023).
Riana, Friski. “Makin Sulit Menikah Beda Agama.” Koran Tempo, Minggu, Agustus 2023. https://koran.tempo.co/read/topik/483671/tahapan-menikah-beda-agama.
Saputri, Rani May, Dzulfikar Rodafi, dan Ahmad Subekti. “PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA (PERBANDINGAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI KEPENDUDUKAN)” 4 (2022).
Sekarbuana, Made Widya, Ida Ayu Putu Widiawati, dan I Wayan Arthanaya. “Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (19 Maret 2021): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3044.16-21.
SEMA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2023
Setiyanto, Danu Aris. “Larangan Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam 7, no. 1 (19 September 2017): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2017.7.1.87-106.
Sonafist, Y, dan Henny Yuningsih. “Islamic Law, the State, and Human Rights: The Contestation of Interfaith Marriage Discourse on Social Media in Indonesia.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 22, no. 2 (28 Desember 2023): 381. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.10934.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan
UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/qanun.v3i1.31754
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Qanun: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Qanun is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Qanun agree to the term of journal retains copyright
Abstracting, Indexing and Archiving
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |