IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE BY JUDGES THROUGH THE IMMOSING OF CONDITIONAL CRIMINAL DECISIONS

Aryatama Hibrawan

Abstract


The development of the criminal justice system has brought an approach that previously prioritized retaliation or was called retributive to recovery, which is better known as restorative justice. The retributive approach is considered to be no longer relevant as a solution to resolving criminal cases and is currently considered to cause other problems. In a restorative approach, criminal law aims to restore victims with equal responsibility by the perpetrator. In its development, a recovery-based approach began to be implemented by institutions that are members of the Criminal Justice System including judges through court decisions. A restorative approach through sentencing by a judge can be carried out by imposing a conditional criminal sentence. However, conditional criminal sentences are still very rarely applied, even though through this instrument judges can provide fair decisions that are needed by both victims and perpetrators.

Keywords


Supreme Court; judge; restorative justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


BUKU

ICJR, Peluang dan Tantangan Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Jakarta, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2022.

J. Remmelink, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Materil 3, Yogyakarta, Maharsa, 2017.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung, Alumni, 1998.

Muladi, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat, Bandung, Alumni, 1985.

Noeng Muhadjir, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogyakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1998

R. Soesilo, KUHP Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bandung, Politeia, 1995.

Tenriawaru, dkk, Perbandingan Penerapan Sistem Hukum Progresif (Plea Bargain vs Restorative Justice, Indramayu, Penerbit Adab, 2022.

Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2011.

JURNAL

Kuat Puji Prayitno, Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto), Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 3. (2012)

Lidya Rahmadani Hasibuan, dkk. Restorative Justice Sebagai Pembaharuan sistem Peradilan Pidana Berdasarkan UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana, USU Law Journal Vol. 3, No. 3. (2015)

LAPORAN

Balitbang MA RI, Laporan Penelitian Alternative Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif) dan Court Connected Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Terkait Dengan Pengadilan). (2000)

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek Van Strafrecht).

YURISPRUDENSI

Putusan Nomor 7/Pid.C/2021/PN.Lbs.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sajv.v1i2.24688

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EDITORIAL ADDRESS
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten       
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/sajv/index
E-mail  : [email protected] 

Creative Commons License

Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License