COMPARISON OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS IN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA

Adelia Oktaviani, Satrio Fajar Romadhon, Muhammad Rusli Arafat

Abstract


Juvenile growth is a period when children have a high level of curiosity which sometimes leads them to commit crimes that can cause a high number of juvenile crimes. Juvenile criminal cases in Indonesia in 2020 reached 6,146 cases obtained from the 2020 Supreme Court Annual Report and in South Korea reached 38,590 cases obtained from the South Korean Judicial Yearbook 2020. There is a juvenile justice system to resolve juvenile criminal cases. This judicial system aims to educate and protect the rights of Children in Conflict with the Law (ABH) for their future. The juvenile justice system is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA) and the Juvenile Act in South Korea. A comparison of the juvenile justice system in the two countries in fostering and protecting juveniles is an interesting matter to discuss by paying attention to the statistics on juvenile crime, the juvenile justice system, types of punishment, and the laws that force in both countries. With normative legal research methods, conclusions are drawn regarding the significant differences in the judicial systems of the two countries.

Keywords


Indonesia Juvenile Systems, Korea Juvenile Systems, Juvenile Delinquency, Juvenile act

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bachtiar. Legal Research Methods. Unpam Press, 2019.

Court Adminstration Office. Judicial Yearbook 2021. 2021. https://ebook.scourt.go.kr/kukudocs/v/pBNcOCMupFA

Seoul Family Court. Recommendation of Reconciliation Procedure for Juvenile Protection Cases. 2017.

Ariani, Nevey Varida. “Implementasi Undang – Undang Nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam Upaya Melindungi Kepentingan Anak.” Jurnal Media Hukum 21(1). 2014

Hidayanti, Nur. “Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dan Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak.” Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora 13(2). 2013

Kim, Y.J. “Is juvenile crime increasing and becoming more heinous? Statistically, well.” Hangyeore https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/1039301.html. 2022

Lee, S. H. (2021). “A Critical Study on the Juvenile Regulations in the Juvenile Act.” Juvenile Protection Research, 34(1) (283-306) http://doi.org/10.35930/KJPR. 34.1.11. 2021.

Lee, S. R. “Current State of Juvenile Justice Law and Response Strategies for Juvenile Crime.” Criminal Policy Research, 1047-1080. 2007.

Nidawati, Y. “Criminal Justice System and Juvenile Criminal Justice System”, 2019

Yoon, H. S., & Jeon, M. G. “Empirical Study on Compromise Recommendation System under the Juvenile Act - Survey on Awareness of Members of Compromise Recommendation Committee concerning Administrative Condition of Compromise Recommendation System”. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 7(1), 345-370 (2019).

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). December 07th, 2017, “Kasus “MP” di Palopo dan Tantangan Implementasi UU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia”, Available on Website: https://icjr.or.id/kasus-mp-di-palopo-dan-tantangan-implementasi-uu-sistem-peradilan-pidana-anak-indonesia/, Accessed at July 24th , 2022.

Kim, Yunju. April 18th, 2022, “Is juvenile crime increasing and becoming more heinous? Statistically, well”, Available on Website: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society _general/1039301.html, Accessed at June 10th, 2022.

Law & Good. 2020, “Reconciliation Recommendation System In the Juvenile Protection Procedure.” Available on Website: https://www.lawandgood.com/ counsel/11409 Accessed at July 25th, 2022.

Pengadilan Negeri Stabat. 2016, “Pengadilan Anak (n.d.).” Pengadilan anak: https://www. pn-stabat.go.id/2015-06-06-01-33-01/pengadilan-anak.html Accessed at June 17th, 2022

Seoul Law Group. April 28th, 2021, “Criminal Minors: Special Treatment for Children Who Committed Crime in Korea.” Available on Website: https://seoullawgroup.com/juvenile-crime-in-korea-special-treatment/ Accessed at June 15th, 2022

Court Administration Office. 2018, “2018 Youth Notification Practice (Revised Version): Overview, Case Study, Q&A.”

Mahkamah Agung. 2019, “Laporan Tahunan 2018 Era Baru Modern Berbasis Teknologi Informasi”, Available on Website: https:// mahkamahagung.go.id/files/201902 19121709_FA_MA_20119-_interactive.pdf Accessed at July 24th, 2022

Mahkamah Agung. 2020, “Laporan Tahunan 2019 Keberlanjutan Modernisasi Peradilan”, Available on Website: https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/laptah/laptah2019/ index.html#p=128 Accessed at July 24th, 2022

Mahkamah Agung. 2021, “Laporan Tahunan 2020 dalam Suasana Covid-19”, Available on Website: https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/cms/media/8832 Accessed at July 24th, 2022

United Nations. 1989, “Convention on the Rights of the Child” (Issue Treaty Series, 1577, 3).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tirtayasa Journal of International Law

EDITORIAL ADDRESS
 
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Raya Palka KM 3, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Kab. Serang, Provinsi Banten       
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/tirtayasatjil
E-mail  : [email protected] 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Tirtayasa Journal of International Law (TJIL) is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.