THE DOUBLE STANDARDS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE AND PALESTINE
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
This study investigates the effect of double standards in international law on conflict resolution in Ukraine and Palestine. Through a comparison of conflicts in the two countries, this study finds that double standards in international law affect conflict resolution in Ukraine and Palestine differently. There is evidence of a double standard in international law related to the different interests of the major powers in the conflict in the two countries. The impact of this double standard affects the effectiveness of efforts to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and Palestine, with conflict resolution in Ukraine being achieved more quickly than in Palestine. Therefore, this research suggests the need for consistency and equality in the application of international law in dealing with conflicts, and seeking peace negotiations involving all parties involved in the conflict in order to achieve a sustainable resolution.
Keywords: Double Standards, Conflict Resolution, Parties Involved.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arsyam, Muhammad, and M. Yusuf Tahir. “Ragam Jenis Penelitian Dan Perspektif.” Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, Vol.2, No. 1 (2021);
Chachko, Elena, and Katerina Linos. “International Law after Ukraine: Introduction to the Symposium.” AJIL Unbound 116, no. 2011 (2022);
Colombo, Sandro. “Are Death and Suffering in Ukraine Different than in Yemen, Afghanistan or Ethiopia? Double Standards in Humanitarian Assistance.” Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, Vol. 46, No. 3 (2022);
Harahap, Ali Musa, Rudi Candra, Aprilia Restuning Tunggal, Ida Susilowati, Dini Septyana Rahayu, Afni Regita Cahyani Muis, Zahidiyah Ela Tursina, and Novi Rizka Amalia. Mengenal Hubungan Internasional Madani. Edited by Ali Musa Harahap. Ponorogo, Jawa Timur: UNIDA Gontor Press, 2022;
Khairunisa, Adilah Hasna, Mohamad Rosyidin, and Muhammad Faizal Alfian. “Memori Dan Trauma Dalam Hubungan Internasional: Dukungan Austria Terhadap Israel Dalam Melawan Aksi Boikot, Divestasi, Dan Sanksi (BDS).” Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1 (2022);
Manurung, Hendra, Arry Bainus, Rusadi Kantaprawira, and Teuku Rezasyah. “Indonesia’S Defence Diplomacy in Asia Pacific: A Study on Indonesia – Russia Defence Cooperation.” Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results Vol. 13, No. 8 (2022);
Mas’odi, Mas’odi. “White Supremacy, Kekerasan Wacana, Dan Ketidakadilan: Analisis Politik Standar Ganda Dunia Barat Dalam Konflik Di Palestina Dan Ukaraina.” Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies Vol. 5, No. 2 (2022);
Setiawan, Azhari. “Diplomatic Dilemma Dan Standar Ganda Politik Amerika Serikat Terhadap Konflik Sipil-Militer Mesir Tahun 2013.” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015);
Slimia, Awad, Prof Mohammad, and Fuad Othman. “The Double Standards of Western Countries Toward Ukraine and Palestine ‘Western Hypocrisy." Central European Management Journal 30 (2022);
Sungkar, Syakieb. “Benturan Antarperadaban Huntington.” Dekonstruksi, Vol. 6, No. 01 (2022):
Yasuaki, Onuma. “The ICJ: An Emperor Without Clothes? International Conflict Resolution, Article 38 of the ICJ Statute and the Sources of International Law.” Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (2023);
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19694
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tirtayasa Journal of International Law
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law (TJIL) is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.