COMBATANT STATUS UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR INDONESIAN NATIONAL ARMY OPERATIONS IN SEPARATIST CONFLICTS

Laksono M. A. Gumelar; Rinaldy Amrullah; Adrienn Becánics; Ria Wierma Putri

doi:10.51825/tjil.v4i1.32696

COMBATANT STATUS UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR INDONESIAN NATIONAL ARMY OPERATIONS IN SEPARATIST CONFLICTS

Laksono M. A. Gumelar, Rinaldy Amrullah, Adrienn Becánics, Ria Wierma Putri

Abstract

The armed conflict between the Indonesian National Army and separatist groups in Papua shows the characteristics of a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) based on international humanitarian law (IHL). However, the legal status of Indonesian National Army soldiers in this conflict has not been clearly defined in the national legal system, thus creating ambiguity regarding their protection and accountability. This study aims to analyze the combatant status of Indonesian National Army soldiers in NIAC based on international legal instruments and national regulations. Through a normative legal approach comparisons with other countries such as Colombia, Philippines, and Hungary are examined to assess legal gaps and best practices. The research findings indicate that, although combatant status is not formally recognized in NIAC, the fundamental principles of IHL remain applicable to all parties. The study concludes that Indonesia must reform its legal framework to ensure both the protection of soldiers acting lawfully and accountability for IHL violations

Keywords

Combatant status, International Humanitarian Law, Separatism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Act C of 2012, https://thb.kormany.hu/download/a/46/11000/Btk_EN.pdf, access on June 9, 2025

Akande, D., & Gillard, E. (2015). Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts. In: Clapham, A., Gaeta, P., & Sassòli, M. (Eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.

Amnesty International, “Philippines 2020: Human Rights Violations by Armed Forces,” https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/asia-and-the-pacific/philippines/.

Andrew Clapham, (2014). The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press.

Aprilia Solerang, (2018) “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Sipil Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Non-Internasional Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional” Lex Et Societatis Vol. 6 No. 10.

Cassese, A. (2003). International Law. Oxford University Press.

Dinstein, Y. (2012). Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Elvira Rumkabu, "Human Rights Justice in Indonesia: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Law No. 26 of 2000," Jurnal Hukum Right Because Right, Vol. 27 No. 1, 2020, hlm. 135–149.

European Court of Human Rights, Case of Korbély v. Hungary, 2008 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-88429%22]}, Accessed on June 9, 2025

Human Rights Watch, “Colombia’s Military Justice System,” 2012, https://www.hrw.org.

Henckaerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules. ICRC/Cambridge University Press.

Hitipeuw, C.B., Kainama, M., & Waas, R.M. (2023). “Perlindungan Penduduk Sipil Dari Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata Di Provinsi Papua Ditinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter Internasional”. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(11).

Hoffmann, Tamás. (2009) "Individual Criminal Responsibility for Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflicts: The Hungarian Jurisprudence on the 1956 Volley Cases." Criminal Law Between War and Peace: Justice and Cooperation in Criminal Matters in International Military Interventions.

______________ (2024) "Between Politics and Justice: International Criminal Law in Hungary." International Criminal Law Review1.aop.

ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, IT-94-1-A, 15 July 1999.

ICRC Casebook,“Non-International Armed Conflict.” 2016–2022. https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/non-international-armed-conflict

ICRC (2021). Commentary of the Geneva Conventions. https://casebook.icrc.org

ICRC (1987). Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

International Center for Transitional Justice, “Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia,” 2019, https://www.ictj.org.

Jayapura District Court Decision Number 172/Pid.B/2021/PN Jap, in the case of the crime of treason committed by members of a separatist group in Papua.

Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, (2005) Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules, Cambridge University Press.

Judith Gardam, (2002) “The Law of Armed Conflict: A Gender Perspective,” Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 12, No. 1.

Melzer, N. (2016). International Humanitarian Law: A Comprehensive Introduction. ICRC.

Savitri, N. (2020). “Konflik Bersenjata Non-Internasional dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional.” Jurnal Hukum Internasional, Vol. 17, No. 1.

Sefriani., & Mahardhika, N. (2023). “The Legality of Military Involvement in Law Enforcement Operations Against Criminal Armed Groups in Indonesia’s Papua Province”. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1515

Silalahi, W. (2021). “Indonesian National Army Involvement in Handling Terrorism Action from Legal Perspective”. Constitutional. https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale .v2i1.2255

Simaela, A. et al. (2023). “Status Konflik Papua dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional”. Papua Law Review, 6(1).

Sivakumaran, S. (2016). The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press.

Tarigan, H., & Saputro, G. (2021). “The Role Of The Indonesian National Army (Tni) In Countering Terrorism”. JP, 7, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.33172/JP.V7I1.1167

Yoram Dinstein, (2016) The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v4i1.32696